Page 7 of 47
Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 3:04 pm
by Oakley
A question for all....
Which one are you?
My myself, I claim guy with the beard, he seems to be having a good time.
Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 3:04 pm
by Lacewing
Age to Flash wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 11:49 pm
just because I read, and reply, when I do, this does NOT necessarily mean that I am MISSING the WHOLE, NOR does it mean that I am NOT connecting small pieces of information together into a cogent whole.
But you have not proven that you do or can.
Age to Flash wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 11:49 pm
NEVER provide ANY ACTUAL PROOF for their CLAIMS.
Do you think you've done this for your claims? If so, where?
If not, as you say:
Age to Flash wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 11:49 pm
without evidence you are REALLY SAYING NOTHING AT ALL.
Without PROOF what you are, essentially, saying and doing here is; Egotistically, CLAIMING that 'you' understand MORE than 'I' do, and that 'you' are BETTER than 'I' am.
Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 4:50 pm
by Walker
Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 4:57 pm
by henry quirk
Oakley wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 3:04 pm
A question for all....
Which one are you?
My myself, I claim guy with the beard, he seems to be having a good time.
I'm the guy bangin' Nurse Ratched in the broom closet.
Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 5:32 pm
by FlashDangerpants
I'm obscured by the furniture
Nope, wait, I'm out now.
Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 5:49 pm
by Lacewing
I'm around the corner, mixing up the meds.
Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 12:06 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 5:32 pm
I'm obscured by the furniture
Nope, wait, I'm out now.
He looks surprisingly 'taut' and smooth there. I would have expected more hair and 'wobble'

Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 12:43 am
by Age
uwot wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 2:12 pm
Age wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 1:41 pmWould 'you', "uwot", care to CHALLENGE me on MY CLAIM, which DIRECTLY OPPOSES YOUR CLAIM, regarding thee Universe, Itself?
Absolutely. What is your claim?
My claim: The Universe NEVER began and is NOT expanding. Thus is eternal and infinite.
Your claim: The Universe began and is expanding. Thus is transient and limited.
If this is correct, then let us begin.
Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 12:48 am
by Age
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 2:28 pm
Age wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 12:15 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 11:50 am
I already don't read most of what you write. I've told you that before and then spent happy months readin none of your posts. Normal service will resume shortly.
WHY NOT now?
Are you DESPERATELY WANTING TO LEARN SOME THING NEW? Or, is there some OTHER reason?
If yes, then WHAT IS that REASON?
Or, will you HIDE this ALSO?
I do what I like, when I feel like doing it.
EXACTLY, and as I keep REMINDING 'you', human beings; 'you' are absolutely FREE to choose to do whatever you want to do.
SO, 'you' can CHOOSE to carry on the way you are now, or, CHOOSE to CHANGE, for the better or not.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 2:28 pm
Age wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 10:00 am
WHEN 'you', people, STOP 'trying to' TELL ME that I BELIEVE things, then I will STOP telling 'you' that I DO NOT. VERY SIMPLE REALLY.
Do you believe that?
The IMMATURITY of this speaks for itself.
Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 1:00 am
by Age
Oakley wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 2:51 pm
uwot wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 2:02 pmWelcome aboard.
Thank you. Could you tell me please, what time of day do the nurses distribute the medications?
Wanting a world without men, just because men behave violently, and kill "others", JUST LIKE WOMEN DO, and do kill "others", and thinking that a world without men could actually be achieved and would actually work, is like wanting a world without winter, because winter can be 'violent' (freezing) and kills people, just like summer can be 'violent' (burns) and kills people, just like rain can be 'violent' (floods) and kills people, just like the sun can be 'violent' (dehydrates) and kills people.
So would do you think a world without the sun and the rain would be 'better' also, and would actually work?
The reason men are violent is for the EXACT SAME reason women are violent, and that reason is because of the way 'you', adult human beings, raise children.
Therefore, if 'you' CHANGED 'your' ways, individually AND collectively, for the BETTER, then children would NOT grow up being violent.
VERY SIMPLE and VERY EASY, REALLY.
And, from the start of this thread where you wrote:
That's enough for now, look forward to hearing your thoughts.
To which I replied:
You appear to be NOT REALLY looking forward to ANY thought, which OPPOSES your view here
Which now appears to have become ABSOLUTELY True, correct?
Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 1:12 am
by Age
Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 3:04 pm
Age to Flash wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 11:49 pm
just because I read, and reply, when I do, this does NOT necessarily mean that I am MISSING the WHOLE, NOR does it mean that I am NOT connecting small pieces of information together into a cogent whole.
But you have not proven that you do or can.
And you have not proved that I have NOT.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 3:04 pm
Age to Flash wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 11:49 pm
NEVER provide ANY ACTUAL PROOF for their CLAIMS.
Do you think you've done this for your claims? If so, where?
I have PROVIDED SOME PROOF. But because this has NOT YET been FULLY LOOKED AT and DISCUSSED, then there is NO USE moving along further.
Where I have done this is in my posts. And, IF you PROVIDED a BIT MORE SPECIFIC IDEA or CLUE as to 'what' CLAIMS you are referring to, then I can be a BIT MORE SPECIFIC in regards to WHERE.
See, the DIFFERENCE here is I have PROVIDE, so there is SOME thing to LOOK AT and DISCUSS. Whereas, the "other" has NOT EVEN PROVIDED absolutely ANY thing, so that 'we' can LOOK AT 'it', and then DISCUSS 'it'.
OBVIOUSLY, if NOTHING is PROVIDED, then there is NOTHING to SEE nor to DISCUSS.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 3:04 pm
If not, as you say:
Age to Flash wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 11:49 pm
without evidence you are REALLY SAYING NOTHING AT ALL.
Without PROOF what you are, essentially, saying and doing here is; Egotistically, CLAIMING that 'you' understand MORE than 'I' do, and that 'you' are BETTER than 'I' am.
Which is, OBVIOUSLY, Correct.
I have, ALSO, ALREADY PROVIDED the 'evidence', and even the 'proof', for my CLAIMS, for ALL of 'you' to LOOK AT, and then DISCUSS. Now, all you have to is just that.
I now just AWAIT for your CHALLENGES and/or CLARIFYING QUESTIONS in regards to my ALREADY SUPPLIED 'evidence' and 'proofs'.
Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 1:19 am
by Walker
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jun 26, 2021 1:12 am
I now just AWAIT for your CHALLENGES and/or CLARIFYING QUESTIONS in regards to my ALREADY SUPPLIED 'evidence' and 'proofs'.
In principle, what constitutes acceptable proof?
In particular, for determining sex* it's probably a blood test.
The New Zealand weight lifter smashing all the female records seems to be skating by on hormone levels.
Changing definitions helps. For example, in the US, infrastructure now means everything.
Boudicca! was a gal all the tribes agreed on.
* sub-forum relevance
Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 1:50 am
by FlashDangerpants
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jun 26, 2021 12:48 am
The IMMATURITY of this speaks for itself.
Such is the belief of the "human" who calls himself age
Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 5:55 am
by Lacewing
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jun 26, 2021 1:12 am
I have PROVIDED SOME PROOF.
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jun 26, 2021 1:12 amI have, ALSO, ALREADY PROVIDED the 'evidence', and even the 'proof', for my CLAIMS
Age to Atla wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 1:19 am
i do NOT provide NOR show the proof. i am just learning how to find the right words to explain to you HOW you can and will FIND and SEE the PROOF "your self".
So which is it? And why can't you keep your story straight?
Re: A World Without Men?
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 6:46 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
Walker wrote: ↑Sat Jun 26, 2021 1:19 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jun 26, 2021 1:12 am
I now just AWAIT for your CHALLENGES and/or CLARIFYING QUESTIONS in regards to my ALREADY SUPPLIED 'evidence' and 'proofs'.
In principle, what constitutes acceptable proof?
In particular, for determining sex* it's probably a blood test.
The New Zealand weight lifter smashing all the female records seems to be skating by on hormone levels.
Changing definitions helps. For example, in the US, infrastructure now means everything.
Boudicca! was a gal all the tribes agreed on.
* sub-forum relevance
Good. I hope every gold medal is won by these hideous 'women when it suits them' so we can all see this farce for what it is and finally shake some sense into the human race.