Philosophy Now Forum

Age wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:21 am'Who' is writing their BOOK is thee one and ONLY, non visible, Mind, Itself.

'What' is writing their BOOK is thee one and ONLY, visible, Universe, Itself.

is there such a thing as an invisible WHO..?

The ''WHO mind'' is ( I DO NOT KNOW )who or what is writing the book - the WHO can only be an idea...

The visible ''What'' is ( I DO KNOW ) who or what is writing their book - is still an idea

SO AGAIN, all you've said is a lawnmower is writing the book. Or was it the boogieman?

The point is...I DO NOT KNOW who....but any label will do.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:21 am
1. I do NOT do 'theory'.
2. What I say has ALREADY been PROVEN True, Right, and Correct.

Exactly.



You claim what you say has ALREADY been PROVEN True, Right, and Correct. Then why do you need to make a copy of this proof.

If you can know this truth claim that what you say has ALREADY been PROVEN True, Right, and Correct..then everyone can know it too.

The source of this truth claim will be the same for everyone.

So maybe your writing it for yourself, just for fun, just for a hobby, just for something to do to make your little electrons bounce up and down with excitment.

Beats boredom I suppose. There's nothing else to do here.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:36 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:21 am'Who' is writing their BOOK is thee one and ONLY, non visible, Mind, Itself.

'What' is writing their BOOK is thee one and ONLY, visible, Universe, Itself.

is there such a thing as an invisible WHO..?

YES. As I have STATED and EXPLAINED previously.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:36 pm The ''WHO mind'' is ( I DO NOT KNOW )who or what is writing the book - the WHO can only be an idea...

This is just an idea from the one known as "dontaskme".

This does not necessarily have any bearing on what is FACTUALLY True, Right, and/or Correct.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:36 pm The visible ''What'' is ( I DO KNOW ) who or what is writing their book - is still an idea

Again, this is still just an idea from the one known as "dontaskme".

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:36 pm SO AGAIN, all you've said is a lawnmower is writing the book. Or was it the boogieman?

Thee ONLY one who has said this is the one known as "dontaskme".

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:36 pm The point is...I DO NOT KNOW who....but any label will do.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:45 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:21 am
1. I do NOT do 'theory'.
2. What I say has ALREADY been PROVEN True, Right, and Correct.

Exactly.



You claim what you say has ALREADY been PROVEN True, Right, and Correct. Then why do you need to make a copy of this proof.

How many times do 'I' NEED to tell 'you' that I do NOT 'need' to do any such thing, BEFORE 'you' comprehend this?

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:36 pm If you can know this truth claim that what you say has ALREADY been PROVEN True, Right, and Correct..then everyone can know it too.

OBVIOUSLY and OF COURSE.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:36 pm The source of this truth claim will be the same for everyone.

OBVIOUSLY and OF COURSE.

The only difference here though is the 'you' known as "dontaskme" BELIEVES that this 'source' is UNDEFINABLE, EXPLAINABLE, and UNKNOWABLE. Whereas 'I' state that this 'source' is very easy to define, explain, and KNOW.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:36 pm So maybe your writing it for yourself, just for fun, just for a hobby, just for something to do to make your little electrons bounce up and down with excitment.

When 'you' can answer the question; 'Who am 'I'?' properly and correctly and 'you' have also understood and KNOW how thee Mind and the brain actually work, then 'you' will NOT be wondering any more WHY 'I' am writing a book.

Oh, and by the way, you could just ask a CLARIFYING QUESTION instead.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:36 pm Beats boredom I suppose. There's nothing else to do here.

'Where' is the word 'here' referring to, EXACTLY?

Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 11:55 amThe only difference here though is the 'you' known as "dontaskme" BELIEVES that this 'source' is UNDEFINABLE, EXPLAINABLE, and UNKNOWABLE. Whereas 'I' state that this 'source' is very easy to define, explain, and KNOW.

Oh, I see we are back to the difference between the 'you' and the 'I' game again.

Have fun talking to and with yourself Ken...because any other source would be different and not exactly useful for you would it.

You have no argument with anyone Idiot. Don't even bother, I've got you sussed, and you won't even be able to understand that because you are just another fool like me.

Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 11:55 am
'Where' is the word 'here' referring to, EXACTLY?

SOURCE


Sorry did you forget again...are you now requesting a clarification from another source....or is there only your source...gosh I really hope this other source is a satisfying answer.

Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 11:55 amWhen 'you' can answer the question; 'Who am 'I'?' properly and correctly and 'you' have also understood and KNOW how thee Mind and the brain actually work, then 'you' will NOT be wondering any more WHY 'I' am writing a book.

No one ever wrote or read a book.

But I wish you lots of fun in la la land with your imaginary friend.

Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 11:55 amWhen 'you' can answer the question; 'Who am 'I'?' properly and correctly and 'you' have also understood and KNOW how thee Mind and the brain actually work, then 'you' will NOT be wondering any more WHY 'I' am writing a book.

That's because 'you' won't have to know or wonder 'Who am I'' because the book will contain the answer to the question '' Who am I''

Only problem here is that the narrative would have to be believed. No belief, would mean there is no knowledge AT ALL of ''Who am I'' ?


And that is a dilemma for Ken, because Ken has no beliefs. Ken is just a fictional idea manifest in the form of an image, an image of the imageless. In reality the 'WHO' question never arises, the 'who' is just a fictional belief.

See how effortlessly this is explained.

The problem here is that SOURCE has NO need to be explained twice. SOURCE has no need for a copy...for one very good reason. Everyone knows this because everyone is no one.

So in my humble opinion, all yee distinguished ladies and gentlemen have no need to be selling water by the river. We've all heard the story so many times before over and over and over again.

I feel a song coming on...or even a movie or a book....

A reality made up of just water colours of paint written upon flowing water.

.

SO AGAIN, all you've said is a lawnmower is writing the book. Or was it the boogieman?

Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 11:47 amThee ONLY one who has said this is the one known as "dontaskme".

You can only know that as and through what was written.

So do you believe the narrative as it was written, as you read it ...do you believe this narrative that was written to be true?

Do you believe that a character called 'dontaskme' exists and that this character can say what you are claiming to have been said when you read the written words of this character?

Age aka the physical universe is writing a book.

2 Questions to Age aka the physical universe:

1: what are you going to title your book?

2: what are you going to do with the book when it's finished?

Dontaskme's new book already exists, it's titled '' Who am I ''

Here is the entire contents of the book for your perusal: ( Once upon a time, the end. )

Does anyone reading this thread think it will become a best seller?

It'll come in handy for when I run out of toilet rolls. Not that I'm one of those shitting myself kind of person or anything like that..

But then I guess the job is never finished until the paperwork is done.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:27 pm

Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 11:55 amThe only difference here though is the 'you' known as "dontaskme" BELIEVES that this 'source' is UNDEFINABLE, EXPLAINABLE, and UNKNOWABLE. Whereas 'I' state that this 'source' is very easy to define, explain, and KNOW.

Oh, I see we are back to the difference between the 'you' and the 'I' game again.

Have fun talking to and with yourself Ken...because any other source would be different and not exactly useful for you would it.

But those 'things' are NOT the 'source', as there is REALLY ONLY One 'source'.

Also, EACH and EVERY one of 'you' is EXTREMELY USEFUL for 'I'.

'you' REALLY do NOT YET have ANY comprehension NOR ANY understanding of what 'I' have been ACTUALLY MEANING here, have you?

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:27 pm You have no argument with anyone Idiot. Don't even bother, I've got you sussed, and you won't even be able to understand that because you are just another fool like me.

Okay. Understood.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:27 pm

This is what 'I' have been saying, AND MEANING. That is; 'I', in the non visible sense, is thee one and ONLY One, which is FOREVER and actually does SEE ALL.

Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 8:11 pm'you' REALLY do NOT YET have ANY comprehension NOR ANY understanding of what 'I' have been ACTUALLY MEANING here, have you?

'you' REALLY do NOT YET have ANY comprehension NOR ANY understanding of what 'I' have been ACTUALLY MEANING here, have you?

Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 8:11 pm
This is what 'I' have been saying, AND MEANING. That is; 'I', in the non visible sense, is thee one and ONLY One, which is FOREVER and actually does SEE ALL.

No shit sherlock.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:34 pm

Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 11:55 am
'Where' is the word 'here' referring to, EXACTLY?

SOURCE

So, when the one known as "dontaskme" uses the word 'here', what that actually refers to is 'SOURCE', correct?

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:27 pm Sorry did you forget again...

But I have NEVER asked you this before. So, you have NEVER CLARIFIED this before.

You ALSO have NEVER said NOR explained this before. So, HOW could I "forget"?

See, I am NOT asking 'you' for what is the ACTUAL Truth of things IS. I am just asking 'you' to explain how 'you' SEE things.

Look, 'you' wrote;
There's nothing else to do here.

And I was curious as to what the one known as "dontaskme" actually refers to when they used the word 'here', here.

'you' CLARIFIED this by stating that the word 'here' refers EXACTLY to SOURCE. So, what 'you' are ESSENTIALLY saying IS:

There is nothing else to do SOURCE. You stated this in regards to YOUR BOREDOM and for YOUR WRITING.

Now, I have NO interest NOR curiosity at all in 'trying to' get 'you' to CLARIFY what this now ACTUALLY MEANS. So, I will just leave 'you' with what 'you' with what 'you' have written.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:34 pm are you now requesting a clarification from another source....

NO, because, to me, there is NO "another" source. To me, there is REALLY only just One 'source', from which MANY interpretations are made.

Getting back to that One True Source, then ALL is REVEALED, SEEN, and KNOWN.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:34 pm or is there only your source...gosh I really hope this other source is a satisfying answer.

But the ONLY 'satisfying answers' are those ones, which 'you' ALREADY BELIEVE are true and right, correct?

Look, 'you' ALREADY BELIEVE that 'you' ALREADY KNOW what the truth is, correct?

If this is correct, then what is 'it', which 'you' are seeking and looking for here, in this forum?