Re: Law is Neither Obeyed Disobeyed Nor Broken
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 5:20 am
nothing wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:26 amIt's not "counting" its "accounting for". You can't "count" yourself. You can "account" for yourself, or try to "account" for others and the former in relation to the latter.There you go counting again...counting fallacy in math section.
Theoretic must collapse back into a practical application(s) else: it is meaningless.
Really, there is 1 eod that exists through many versions relative to context. There is the forum version. The work version. The nice guy version. The asshole version. Etc.
Possibility is a 'state' potential actuality, thus knowing one knows not is neutral.Possibility is not actuality, thus you actually do not know.
"Believing" the same 'state' to be a definite *not* is a local collapse.
Potentiality is unactuality. You are talking about unactual truths.
You play that card like the Muhammadans play their "Islamophobia" card.Its not even a card.
Compare me to a Muslim or Christian or whatever, but that is a point of view.
I already know not to believe Islam has vedic origins. Taken from the Bhavishya Purana (the speaker is Muhammad):If you are going to take the hindu perspective why don't you do the research into the "vedic origins of islam".
Who is to judge God's will?"O King, your religion is of course known as the best religion among all. Still, by the order of the Lord, I am going to establish a terrible and demoniac religion and enforce a strong creed over the meat-eaters [mlecchas]. My followers will be known by their cut [circumcised] genitals, they will have no shikha [tuft of hair on their head, like Brahmanas], but will have a beard, make noise loudly, and eat all kinds of animals except swine without observing any rituals. They will perform purificatory acts with the musala, and thus be called musalman, and not purify their things with kusha grass [one of the Vedic customs]. Thus, I will be the originator of this adharmic [opposed to Vedic or Aryan Dharma] and demoniac religion of the meat-eating nations."
Regardless of what its source is, it is essentially true: especially the "make loud noises" part. Muhammadans whine and squeal like pigs while accusing the Jews (ie. themselves) as being of the same nature. You remind them that Muhammad was a pig, and they whine and squeal with enmity and desire to spill blood (ie. Canaanite) and they will blame the "blasphemer" despite "blasphemy" existing only in relation to an idol being actively worshiped. It is called 'idol worship' and Islam is most certainly and most definitely 'idol worship' of a, wait for it, dead pedophile man. This is what Islam elevates as the greatest "model" for all of humanity: a polygamous pedophile dead warlord. This is how Muslim defines "good": Muhammad. It is idol worship, as is Christianity and Judaism with their respective Jesus and Moses idols. The entire network of idols is going to collapse.
God gives to both the good and evil.
Many deaths are many fragments of a single ongoing 'void' being knowing not of their own ignorance: of the very cessation of it.Void isn't even death. Death is fragmented life.
The more it is buried, the deeper one will have to dig to uproot it. Best to stop burying.
Really, the vedic faith has origins for 0 and a 0 dimension which equates to God.