Philosophy Now Forum

Harbal wrote:

Walker wrote: As the atheist follows the hard-wire to must rub out, must rub out, he fails to answer the riddle, i.e., address the content.

Stuck on rubbin out, ain't ya.

If that was an attempt at an explanation of something, it failed miserably.

You did try for the content of the riddle, which is the topic. But you were wrong.

Walker wrote:Oh you must have ignored or missed that. It has been decided that rubbing out is the PC term for destroy.

This is the prime mover for atheists.

To destroy God.

Rub out.

You need to get with the times. That is not what rubbing out means. Here's a hint. It's your favourite pastime from what I can gauge of you.

sthitapragya wrote:

Walker wrote:Oh you must have ignored or missed that. It has been decided that rubbing out is the PC term for destroy.

This is the prime mover for atheists.

To destroy God.

Rub out.

You need to get with the times. That is not what rubbing out means. Here's a hint. It's your favourite pastime from what I can gauge of you.

Atheist, you are the destroyer.

You are the one who rubs out God.

Walker wrote: You did try for the content of the riddle, which is the topic. But you were wrong.

Walker! I haven't the faintest idea of what you are ranting about.

Walker wrote:

sthitapragya wrote:

Walker wrote:Oh you must have ignored or missed that. It has been decided that rubbing out is the PC term for destroy.

This is the prime mover for atheists.

To destroy God.

Rub out.

You need to get with the times. That is not what rubbing out means. Here's a hint. It's your favourite pastime from what I can gauge of you.

Atheist, you are the destroyer.

You are the one who rubs out God.

Woah! Hey, God! Let's be clear. I didn't say that. This guy did. OK? And I don't swing that way. So direct your wrath at him, not me.

Harbal wrote:

Walker wrote: You did try for the content of the riddle, which is the topic. But you were wrong.

Walker! I haven't the faintest idea of what you are ranting about.

Then back up in the thread to where it says riddle, before the atheist began the little display of distraction.

Read the riddle, think about it, answer it.

If you want to, of course.

(sotto voice) like herding cats for a simple response

Harbal wrote:

Walker wrote: You did try for the content of the riddle, which is the topic. But you were wrong.

Walker! I haven't the faintest idea of what you are ranting about.

He claims that the crazy stuff he wrote is a riddle and wants us to solve it while he rubs one out. I don't know why he wants that. But it's Walker. So...

Walker wrote:

Harbal wrote:

yiostheoy wrote: You should read his book and then use him for your avatar.

Alas, your recommendations lack sufficient credibility to enable them to be justifiably acted upon.

Are you just another pretty face?

Riddle me this: Who in their right mind would deny that the concept of God is ineffable while experiencing conceptual non-existence’s ineffable-ness?

This is where I started to get puzzled.

No rush.

As atheism is predicated on "no," anything yes-oriented is likely inappropriate to this situation.

Think about it, we'll see what happens later.

Walker wrote:No rush.

As atheism is predicated on "no," anything yes-oriented is likely inappropriate to this situation.

Think about it, we'll see what happens later.

The post where you started your rant had nothing to do with atheism.

Harbal wrote:

Walker wrote:No rush.

As atheism is predicated on "no," anything yes-oriented is likely inappropriate to this situation.

Think about it, we'll see what happens later.

The post where you started your rant had nothing to do with atheism.

Amazing.


The atheist says no the boat, no to the helicopter, and for sake of analogy, no to the riddle.


Ever hear the joke?

Key word, no.

All life does is add to the litany of no.

It bleeds into everything.

Take your time. I'm not here.

I really don't know what this is about, Walker, but I've lost interest.

Harbal wrote:I really don't know what this is about, Walker, but I've lost interest.

It's about answering the riddle instead saying no, I won't even try to understand.

You know, like an atheist.

Walker wrote:This is the prime mover for atheists.

To destroy God.

Right at the beginning I wrote:What atheists say;
There is no evidence of god.
What theists hear:
There is evidence of no god.

Walker, at least, is determined to prove that true.