Nick_A wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:43 pm
Age wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:25 pm
History repeating itself once more.
Another community, which it BELIEVES it knows what thee actual Truth IS, but when asked to provide any proof, examples, or evidence that could support their claims and beliefs, absolutely none can be provided, and then even when asked to clarify what that community is saying and believing to be true, they are completely incapable of doing so.
No matter how much a community wants to believe some thing, like, for example, that the sun revolves around the earth, then that community will stick together even more and 'try to' ridicule and/or punish any one in that community that says or proposes any thing different from what the community believes to be true. But as ALWAYS thee Truth eventually gets exposed.
The Truth always comes to light, it just comes much quicker and much earlier to some, than it does to "others".
The actual Truth shines bright to those who are OPEN to It. No matter what the community want to believe.
You have to decide what attracts you.
Why do I HAVE TO?
I have already decided that through 'logical reasoning' or just plain old 'arguing' the actual Truth of things can be found very easily and very simple, and relatively instantly.
Now if any one else is attracted to logically reasoned discussions, then let us have one. But what has to be made known prior is if one wants to find, discover, learn, and/or know and understand the actual Truth of things, then they first have to be TOTALLY Open and Honest about EVERY thing in the discussion, and just be completely peaceful during the discussion.
Nick_A wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:43 pmMost are concerned with proving and or justifying partial truths within the world of opinions or the visible world in Platonic terms.
Most BELIEVED the sun revolved around the earth. In fact there was probably a time that there was ONLY One saying different. So, what has 'most' got to do with any thing here?
If 'most' are only concerned with proving and/or justifying partial truths within any thing, then so be it.
They are obviously NOT the ones who want to have a discussion with me. I am only concerned with FULL Truth.
Nick_A wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:43 pmA minority are attracted to objective truths which have their existence in what for us is the intelligible world. Objective truth is within the world of forms.
If most are not attracted to objective Truth, then so be it. But be forewarned if they write some thing as though it is an objective Truth and I feel like it, then I will question and challenge them regarding this.
Nick_A wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:43 pmForget all bout this "I am God" stuff.
WHY?
If it is thee Truth, then it is, obviously, thee Truth. If it is not thee Truth, then just prove this fact.
Here is ANOTHER PRIME EXAMPLE of BELIEFS blocking human beings from RECOGNIZING and SEEING the actual Truth of things. Your example here is absolutely no different from; "Forget all about this "Earth revolving around the sun" stuff".
When will 'you', human beings, realize that just because 'you' BELIEVE some thing is true, that this does NOT make it true?
Nick_A wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:43 pm It has been responsible for destroying the psych of more than you know.
But WHAT was the actual thing that "destroyed the psych"?
Obviously just expressing thee Truth and term about 'I am God' does NOT itself 'destroy the psych'. In fact it could very easily be argued that it does the very opposite thing.
To you, could thee actual Truth be it is people, who do NOT listen to, and/or just ridicule or disbelieve, "others", instead, that is what is REALLY 'destroying the psych of "others"?'
Also, why add the words "of more than you know" onto that sentence? Are you 'trying to' make out or suggest that you somehow KNOW more in regards to this matter than I do?
I suggest that if you want to make claims, as though they are true, then you at first have some thing to sustain the claim before you express the claim.
Nick_A wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:43 pmOpening to the world of forms requires becoming capable of sustained conscious attention and freedom from imagination. "I am God" is a dangerous form of imagination because it blocks the ability to experience the inner direction which leads to the world of forms.
Firstly what do you mean by 'forms' when 'you' use that word?
Secondly, stating the 'I' is God did not come just from imagination but from the direct ability to experience the inner, which led to and leads to thee Truth of things.
Also, if the 'I' word in the question is NOT 'God', then who or what am 'I'?
For one to claim what is dangerous or not in relation to the 'I' word, then that one must already KNOW who and/or what 'I' am ALREADY. So, what is 'your' answer to that question?
Nick_A wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:43 pm Consciously contemplate what prevents us from experiencing noesis which leads to thought transcending opinions and you will be much better off.
Why do you not just tell 'us' what prevents 'you' from experiencing True
understanding?
I ALREADY KNOW what prevents 'you', human beings, from learning, understanding, and reasoning, and this is your OWN distorted BELIEFS and ASSUMPTIONS, which is more or less just the opinions within thought.
See the difference between 'you' and 'I', (or in objective Truth the difference between the 'you' and the 'I') is I can support and prove my claims to be True, Right, and Correct, whereas non of 'you' have even shown the slightest ability to do so in regards to the meaningful things in Life, like for explain what the Mind IS and how It works in relation with the brain.