Philosophy Now Forum

It is amazing that science illiterates continue to think they know more about the climate then the entire world's scientific community (and 98%. of climate specialists). I am NOT saying that the fact that it is overwhelmingly the scientific concensus that AGW is real.proves that AGW is real. I am saying that to dismiss their data is anti-science. If ALL scientific data is lies, where do you get your data that AGW is not real? Some guy's blog?

raw_thought wrote:

Hobbes' Choice wrote:

raw_thought wrote:Actually (if you had read up on the subject) climate scientists have determined the effect of humans on climate change. Tho to be fair, climate scientists have UNDERESTIMATED the effect. Similarly, if I know that something has an effect, I will say that I do not know the exact effect. But I do know that it is at least this.

Climate scientists have consistently overestimated the effect of climate change and have an embarrassing history of poorly worked out pronouncements, followed by a litany of backtracking and excuse making.

Ummm NO! Their estimates have consistently UNDERESTIMATED the effect of global warming. STOP MAKING STUFF UP!

In 1990 see level rises were predicted so that by 2020 by town would be under water. It ain't gonna happen.
Given that, is why I am interested in this.
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/ ... ATE-201309

http://www.jstor.org/stable/4314871?seq ... b_contents

Do Republicans hate American values?

Exactly what is meant by that statement? Did somebody put out a list of American values?