Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:23 am
God has always been an inside-out manifestation. I believe the neurosciences can pretty well circumscribe the region He was born in.
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
That's a rather daft unsubstantiated conclusion.sthitapragya wrote:So you have left your own ability to reason behind and do whatever the sage/God tells you without question?attofishpi wrote: The tough times where i was tested are over - now its happy days. The sage/God keeps suggesting that i do art for some reason, in fact a year ago they told me very directly - "don't program, do art."
Ok. Like the morning i climbed from bed and the words "tonight bad luck" were said to me. Then later that night i was beaten up with a baseball bat.Obvious Leo wrote:Many people talk to god, fishy, and in the main this can be seen as a harmless eccentricity. However when god talks back we've got a problem which requires some serious medical intervention. I don't mind sharing a joke with you about this but I hope you realise that this is not in fact a laughing matter but something you should be taking very seriously indeed.
Good point. You don't really need my help.attofishpi wrote: I don't care much for your attempts to discredit me in this manner
That's the thing about getting a blow to the head. Your psyche tends to invent meanings and adds memories to account for the misfortune.attofishpi wrote:Ok. Like the morning i climbed from bed and the words "tonight bad luck" were said to me. Then later that night i was beaten up with a baseball bat.Obvious Leo wrote:Many people talk to god, fishy, and in the main this can be seen as a harmless eccentricity. However when god talks back we've got a problem which requires some serious medical intervention. I don't mind sharing a joke with you about this but I hope you realise that this is not in fact a laughing matter but something you should be taking very seriously indeed.
I don't care much for your attempts to discredit me in this manner, stick to the points in my OP, in particular the two suggestions i have made in relation to the nature of 'God', or don't bother at all.
How is it daft or unsubstantiated? You yourself said you don't know the reason why God told you to do art. You haven't tried to find out. You are simply carrying out the instructions given to you.attofishpi wrote:That's a rather daft unsubstantiated conclusion.sthitapragya wrote:So you have left your own ability to reason behind and do whatever the sage/God tells you without question?attofishpi wrote: The tough times where i was tested are over - now its happy days. The sage/God keeps suggesting that i do art for some reason, in fact a year ago they told me very directly - "don't program, do art."
Regarding Ouzo, I was visited with a number of auditory and visual hallucinations in its development. One of them involved a short conversation with an authoritative voice. I've never had hallucinations outside of Ouzo. What is your take on this?Obvious Leo wrote:Many people talk to god, and in the main this can be seen as a harmless eccentricity. However, when god talks back we've got a problem which requires some serious medical intervention.
bobevenson wrote:Regarding Ouzo, I was visited by a number of auditory and visual hallucinations in its development. One of them involved a short conversation with an authoritative voice. I've never had hallucinations outside of Ouzo. What is your take on this?Obvious Leo wrote:Many people talk to god, and in the main this can be seen as a harmless eccentricity. However, when god talks back we've got a problem which requires some serious medical intervention.
We have addressed "points in you OP", such as they are, it a more rational and logical manner than you seem capable of acknowledging. It's got nothing to do with ego, petty or otherwise.attofishpi wrote:...any other atheist willing to attempt to discredit me here, or is there one out there with the intelligence to actually address the points of my OP in a logical rational manner without letting their petty ego get in the way?
I've not had a lot of personal experience of the powers of ouzo to induce psychosis, Bob, but I've certainly read about it. Absinthe has certainly been shown to have such properties as also has tequila amongst the better known alcoholic stimulants. However the use of psycho-active substances more generally to induce bizarre mind-states has a very ancient provenance across all human cultures and for all of human history. People just love getting off their faces, Bob, and that's simply all there is to it. In fact this tendency is by means restricted to the upright ape because many other species will deliberately seek out specific plant alkaloids as well as naturally fermented alcohols which induce similar effects. If you've never seen a swarm of pissed bees then it's something I would greatly recommend to your personal entertainment. They remind me of myself walking home from the pub.bobevenson wrote:Regarding Ouzo, I was visited with a number of auditory and visual hallucinations in its development. One of them involved a short conversation with an authoritative voice. I've never had hallucinations outside of Ouzo. What is your take on this?Obvious Leo wrote:Many people talk to god, and in the main this can be seen as a harmless eccentricity. However, when god talks back we've got a problem which requires some serious medical intervention.
Absinthe relates indirectly to the book of Revelation: "And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter." -Revelation 8:11. Ouzo is a substitute for absinthe without the wormwood. The interesting thing is that I've only tasted ouzo once in my life, a single shot glass of it in the middle of a dart game at a Cincinnati area bar, which immediately led to my first hallucination.Obvious Leo wrote:I've not had a lot of personal experience of the powers of ouzo to induce psychosis, Bob, but I've certainly read about it. Absinthe has certainly been shown to have such properties as also has tequila amongst the better known alcoholic stimulants.