For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Well I replied to that but the thought police deleted it so with that in mind, I was not upset and you can lick my balls. I'll be fucked if I type all that again.Pluto wrote:Your obviously upset. And wrong.Blaggard wrote:Why is it every time says answer the question someone says there wasn't one. Isn't that just a a lazy way of avoiding arguments. There are never any questions on this forum even when you use a question mark or so I have found, just prevarication in the face of not wanting to answer salient points ever.
That just means you lose you have no answers by the way, just a heads up. You really do suck, and instead of admitting it you say what question in the face of all the unceasing questions. Hope that works out for you.
That is dumb ass argumentation style though that a 5 year old grows out of at age 3.
Can't answer the topic then don't, we all know you can't regardless of the stalling you seem to think is the height of bon mot. Being unable to answer anything and then saying what question is like a a moron finally having an epiphany only to find he just actually shit himself as well.
Rocks can be made out of paper-mache and some paint. But what about the mirrors left on the moon, what do they look like, the shape and form, etc, do we know?What about the rocks. How did they fake those?
Hobbes' Choice wrote: Hoaxers -15. Mooners 100%.[/color]
Telescopes cant see from that far out. There are several different corner mirrors availiable on ebay, your guess is as good as mine.Pluto wrote:Rocks can be made out of paper-mache and some paint. But what about the mirrors left on the moon, what do they look like, the shape and form, etc, do we know?What about the rocks. How did they fake those?
Pluto wrote: But what about the mirrors left on the moon, what do they look like, the shape and form, etc, do we know?
GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:Telescopes cant see from that far out.Pluto wrote: But what about the mirrors left on the moon, what do they look like, the shape and form, etc, do we know?
But you can't fake the isotope ratios nor their composition.Pluto wrote:Rocks can be made out of paper-mache and some paint. But what about the mirrors left on the moon, what do they look like, the shape and form, etc, do we know?
The Hubble doesn't have the resolution, you'd need a 75m+ telescope just to see the lander.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:I don't see any pics of the mirrors taken by the Hubble telescope, only by the supposed moon landing footage.
Because it wasn't just NASA doing the analysis.Assuming that NASA is fake, why would you believe the isotope ratios are legit?
They are but formed under different conditions.Also I don't see how moon rocks wouldn't be composed of common elements.
The gases in the rocks come from the solar wind and were captured when the rocks were formed and are, as predicted, different in the isotopic ratios from those formed upon the Earth. We couldn't do this.Also, they could have transformed matter into rocks and gave them strange ratios.
Hmm, as I suspected... thedoc is wrong as per usual, no suprises there.Arising_uk wrote:The Hubble doesn't have the resolution, you'd need a 75m+ telescope just to see the lander.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:I don't see any pics of the mirrors taken by the Hubble telescope, only by the supposed moon landing footage.
How do you know NASA didn't just collect some asteroids or fresh meteors?Because it wasn't just NASA doing the analysis.Assuming that NASA is fake, why would you believe the isotope ratios are legit?They are but formed under different conditions.Also I don't see how moon rocks wouldn't be composed of common elements.The gases in the rocks come from the solar wind and were captured when the rocks were formed and are, as predicted, different in the isotopic ratios from those formed upon the Earth. We couldn't do this.Also, they could have transformed matter into rocks and gave them strange ratios.
They'd not have the same composition and from what I gather lunar meteorites are as rare as hen's teeth.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:How do you know NASA didn't just collect some asteroids or fresh meteors?
Moon rock falls to earth:But you can't fake the isotope ratios nor their composition.
Figured one might have drifted into the shuttles orbit.Arising_uk wrote:They'd not have the same composition and from what I gather lunar meteorites are as rare as hen's teeth.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:How do you know NASA didn't just collect some asteroids or fresh meteors?
http://meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/howdoweknow.htm
When did we get to the asteroids?