Belinda wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 12:02 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 3:44 pm
Belinda wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 2:15 pm
Look at the first line of Genesis and the first line of the Gospel of John, and if you cannot see that God is deterministic ---------!
Point out what you think is "Deterministic" about those lines. There's nothing, actually.
What do you think Logos refers to.
Word. Speech. Expression. It's Greek.
Theologically Logos refers to the word of God. The word of God is not merely any old word but is God's "Let it be".
Yes. God's Word. And?
"In the beginning God" (John) refers to time sequence.
No, to a point in time, clearly. That which has a "beginning" commences at a particular point, for a particular reason, and doesn't merely "congeal out of the mists of time," or something like that. The point is that God is the First Cause, the Creator. But where are we going with that?
You see, the beginning implies what comes after the beginning; God is the maker of time itself.
Time automatically comes into being with matter. Time is essentially the interval required to traverse the distance between any two points. Once you have two atoms, you've automatically got time, as well.
The force that makes for change over time is not chaotic but deterministic.
Well, the opposite of "chaotic" is something like "intentional" or "orderly." It doesn't imply "deterministic": it merely indicates that subsequent events are not following random patterns, but patterns that make some sort of logical sense relative to one another...plausibly, like cause-and-effect, or rational entailment, or time sequencing, or action-and-consequence...there are various possible inferences from that, and likely, more than one.
Nothing I can see in the Genesis account invites you to exclude all that and to opt for determinism. And everything subsequent in Scripture amounts to a refutation of determinism, since human actions are revealed as making a difference or as changing possible outcomes, and humans are held responsible for the choices they make.
So if you think this makes some sort of case for determinism rather than, say action-and-consequence, you'll have to explain why you think it's so.