Page 54 of 70
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:38 pm
by Sculptor
Dubious wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:27 pm
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 6:25 pm
Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 5:33 pm
How do you know that I am •unwitting• and “not aware of the full facts” of modern (American) politics?
I
see Trump differently. He is in a sense similar to yours a manifestation of “karma” (but this implies a distributor of karmic reactions) but I see him as a •manifestation• in a Jungian sense: those Great Men who appear on the world stage for a whole range of reasons — psycho-social, subliminal, even unconscious. The fact is that Trump has significantly disrupted the American political and social show. I see that as positive however his chaos is also dangerous. And I make the choice to ally myself with that rather than support the (detestable) Democrat establishment. I admit my contempt of them has an irrational element.
I like many more of the people who like (admire and admire/tolerate) Trump than I do any Democrat that I can think of. I bank on
them and their potential influence if it happens that the tide is shifted in America. It is improbable — downward trends hardly ever reverse themselves before the bottom out in catastrophe — and so I play my part in a theatre of enactment though I don’t have much faith in the possibility of improvement.
All of my Liberal and ultra-Liberal friends from my university days all voted for Biden (I’ve always lived in ultra-Liberal college towns) and I am out
to spite them! May their tofu go rotten and poison them! It is an issue of the ethics of spite: I am
preferring that displaced, abused, broke and angry Northern workingman to those faggoty snots I used to know. I want to see them
squirm when Payback Day comes round the corner.
Here's how most people in the world see Trump. Apparently he has trouble keeping it in, because he is so full of it.
trump on toilet.jpg
The only thing that's missing is the golden toilet bowl. If he poops in that, he could readily can it and sell it to his devotees as a limited edition of a purely personal nature; after all, he needs the money to pay for his army of lawyers. Considering all the verbal shit his many devotees have unconditionally accepted and even applauded, such a personal souvenir of his inner being consisting of digested cheeseburgers being so compatible with his saintly verbal output, would be akin to bidding on a holy relic.
When Piero Manzoni. sold shit in a can, as art, it was ironic. I would not put it past the likes of Wizard and Jabobi to buy it were in Trump shit.
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 9:04 pm
by Dubious
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:38 pm
When Piero Manzoni. sold shit in a can, as art, it was ironic. I would not put it past the likes of Wizard and Jabobi to buy it were in Trump shit.
If one doesn't have the talent of even a kindergarten artist, irony is all that's left.
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 9:45 pm
by seeds
Dubious wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:27 pm
The only thing that's missing is the golden toilet bowl. If he poops in that, he could readily can it and sell it to his devotees as a limited edition of a purely personal nature; after all, he needs the money to pay for his army of lawyers. Considering all the verbal shit his many devotees have unconditionally accepted and even applauded,
such a personal souvenir of his inner being consisting mostly of digested cheeseburgers being so compatible with his saintly verbal output, would be akin to bidding on a holy relic.
Yes indeed.
It's like what I pointed out in the thread titled
"Trump - a puzzling enigma" back in 2020 where I uploaded this picture...
As I stated back then, judging from that woman's expression, Trump could hock-up a loogie and spit it into her child’s mouth and she would think it was an act of Holy Communion wherein the child is directly receiving a literal aspect of the body of their savior, thus negating the need for any of that transubstantiation business.
Furthermore, it's a darn good thing that Trump's name is larger than Jesus
' name in that sign, otherwise, there could have been some serious trouble.
_______
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 9:50 pm
by Sculptor
seeds wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 9:45 pm
Dubious wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:27 pm
The only thing that's missing is the golden toilet bowl. If he poops in that, he could readily can it and sell it to his devotees as a limited edition of a purely personal nature; after all, he needs the money to pay for his army of lawyers. Considering all the verbal shit his many devotees have unconditionally accepted and even applauded,
such a personal souvenir of his inner being consisting mostly of digested cheeseburgers being so compatible with his saintly verbal output, would be akin to bidding on a holy relic.
Yes indeed.
It's like what I pointed out in the thread titled
"Trump - a puzzling enigma" back in 2020 where I uploaded this picture...
As I stated back then, judging from that woman's expression, Trump could hock-up a loogie and spit it into her child’s mouth and she would think it was an act of Holy Communion wherein the child is directly receiving a literal aspect of the body of their savior, thus negating the need for any of that transubstantiation business.
Furthermore, it's a darn good thing that Trump's name is larger than Jesus
' name in that sign, otherwise, there could have been some serious trouble.
_______
We are watching a documentary ATM "The RIse and Fall OF Boris Johnson". It has truck me that the problems of the Anglo-AMerican world seem less abou the obviously useless Trump and Boris; the problem is with the people and their insane propensity to adulation..
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 9:56 pm
by Alexis Jacobi
Frankly I believe I see all of Trump’s defects clearly — and oddly that is why I appreciate him (on a personal level) and him on an impersonal level. Bannon called him “an armor-piercing shell” while acknowledging his many unsavory imperfections. That is how I take him.
It is very silly to criticize my choice in the typical terms of “stupidity” of lack of proper information. But if that blows your dress up…
Those with The Syndrome, blind to their own complexes and projections, seem always to go this route.
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 10:19 pm
by Harbal
Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 9:56 pm
Frankly I believe I see all of Trump’s defects clearly — and oddly that is why I appreciate him (on a personal level) and him on an impersonal level. Bannon called him “an armor-piercing shell” while acknowledging his many unsavory imperfections. That is how I take him.
It is very silly to criticize my choice in the typical terms of “stupidity” of lack of proper information. But if that blows your dress up…
Those with
The Syndrome, blind to their own complexes and projections, seem always to go this route.
You are prepared to make yourself look an idiot in order to do what you think is the right thing, and I admire you for that, even though what you are doing is the wrong thing. I always suspected there was more to you than I was giving you credit for, and I'm big enough to admit that I was wrong about that.
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 11:01 pm
by Alexis Jacobi
I admire your attempt to insult. That one had a few defects but I appreciate the attempt!
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 11:27 pm
by Dubious
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 9:50 pm
seeds wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 9:45 pm
Dubious wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:27 pm
The only thing that's missing is the golden toilet bowl. If he poops in that, he could readily can it and sell it to his devotees as a limited edition of a purely personal nature; after all, he needs the money to pay for his army of lawyers. Considering all the verbal shit his many devotees have unconditionally accepted and even applauded,
such a personal souvenir of his inner being consisting mostly of digested cheeseburgers being so compatible with his saintly verbal output, would be akin to bidding on a holy relic.
Yes indeed.
It's like what I pointed out in the thread titled
"Trump - a puzzling enigma" back in 2020 where I uploaded this picture...
As I stated back then, judging from that woman's expression, Trump could hock-up a loogie and spit it into her child’s mouth and she would think it was an act of Holy Communion wherein the child is directly receiving a literal aspect of the body of their savior, thus negating the need for any of that transubstantiation business.
Furthermore, it's a darn good thing that Trump's name is larger than Jesus
' name in that sign, otherwise, there could have been some serious trouble.
_______
We are watching a documentary ATM "The RIse and Fall OF Boris Johnson". It has truck me that the problems of the Anglo-AMerican world seem less about the obviously useless Trump and Boris;
the problem is with the people and their insane propensity to adulation..
...that's precisely it! Even those with a lesser amount of intelligence but nevertheless spiced with a degree of common sense would never yield to someone so completely bereft of the so-called redeeming features humans normally respond to. It was never the individual assholes who are or were the main perpetrators of decline but the endless mass-produced clones of the stupid gene who gave them that power.
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 11:29 pm
by Sculptor
Were there the same justice for the rich as exists for the poor. The result would be this...
trumboris gaol.JPG
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 11:35 pm
by Dubious
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 11:29 pm
Were there the same justice for the rich as exists for the poor. The result would be this...
trumboris gaol.JPG
Boris looks like he could use a drink; Trump looks downtrodden by the prospect of never again being able to order a cheeseburger!
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 12:13 am
by Harbal
Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 11:01 pm
I admire your attempt to insult. That one had a few defects but I appreciate the attempt!
It was exactly as it was supposed to be, actually.

Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 4:38 am
by Alexis Jacobi
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:08 am
by Harbal
Ah, more examples of legitimate concern syndrome.
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:53 am
by Sculptor
THough there is some hysterical exaggeration the fact remains - and its all there to read about - Trump is going to change the constitution.
He shall give himself immunity is one thing. But the real problems are all perfectly easy to read in "PROJECT 2025"
This will make Trump dictator. It's not his idea - he's too stupid. But this plan is modelled on what Julius Caesar did when he made himself dictator in perpetuity having unltimate veto and removing boundaries to separation of power.
JC was finally assassinated, but the changes he wrought marked the end of the republic and the instigation of the role of EMperor..
If you really think the US is best run on Putin's model then by all means vote for Trump
But make no mistake that is what you are getting.
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 12:23 pm
by Alexis Jacobi
The present Democrat régime has, beyond all doubt, proved itself a substantial danger to the republic and, necessarily, has provoked and stimulated a reaction.
The ‘long march through the institutions’ — a reference to Gramsci’s socio-political plan — is being confronted.
There are certainly dangers but I am clear with which side I will take my stand.
In the Mandate's foreword, the Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts writes: "The long march of cultural Marxism through our institutions has come to pass. The federal government is a behemoth, weaponized against American citizens and conservative values, with freedom and liberty under siege as never before."
If you really think the US is best run on Putin's model then by all means vote for Trump. But make no mistake that is what you are getting.
Tricky rhetoric there. I do not agree to the former. And I stated who I’ll vote for and why. I take you as seriously as I take the hysterics rehearsing freak-outs.
The
full video is worth watching.