Re: Can Capitalism and Communism be combined?
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:05 pm
We knew you knew nothing about philosophy, fool, and now we know you know nothing about physics!chaz wyman wrote:No moron, they combine.
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
We knew you knew nothing about philosophy, fool, and now we know you know nothing about physics!chaz wyman wrote:No moron, they combine.

Okay...just socialism then...I was just being nice and offering you a compromise. But now that I see you want one or the other...Sooooo..... we will have socialism...because I said so.....bobevenson wrote: And while you're at it, capitalism can't even exist with socialism
Capitalism has brought everybody in the United States a higher standard of living, where even today's poorest families would have been considered rich not that many years ago.artisticsolution wrote:
Are you starting to see the nonsense in your capitalistic viewpoint?
Nope.bobevenson wrote:Capitalism has brought everybody in the United States a higher standard of living, where even today's poorest families would have been considered rich not that many years ago.artisticsolution wrote:
Are you starting to see the nonsense in your capitalistic viewpoint?
It doesn't pay for me to argue a well-known fact that may not be so well known to Europeans!chaz wyman wrote:Nope.bobevenson wrote:Capitalism has brought everybody in the United States a higher standard of living, where even today's poorest families would have been considered rich not that many years ago.artisticsolution wrote:
Are you starting to see the nonsense in your capitalistic viewpoint?
When all "well know facts" are things that only you believe, I feel not obligation to take anything you say seriously.bobevenson wrote: It doesn't pay for me to argue a well-known fact that may not be so well known to Europeans!
Hopefully, the following statement from economics Prof. Walter Williams will set you straight:chaz wyman wrote:When all "well know facts" are things that only you believe, I feel not obligation to take anything you say seriously.bobevenson wrote: It doesn't pay for me to argue a well-known fact that may not be so well known to Europeans!
Bill Wiltrack wrote:.
Dawn, your fourth sentence: Any examples of both extremes working in unison will also be helpful.
and I think what your are contemplating is already working fabulously, in China, in America, and many other Western civilizations.
For the poor, they will live under the tenants of Communism. For the rich, they will enjoy everything that is taken from the poor. And the rich will enjoy it in any system they choose.
In summary; You and me will continue to be indoctrinated into the Communist ideology of less is more and the richest 1% can enjoy a larger portion of the fruits of our labor. Enjoy.
I'm not sure you will need a special study as you mention in your original post. You are the study.
Get in line & lap it up!
..................................................
Poverty in the US almost as bad as in North Korea
While there are five million in North Korea that face food shortages, the same number in the US is 45 million.
...................................................
The rise in the number of homeless and hungry Americans have reached epidemic proportions.
one tiny note; your signature, Shit could be worse. Well, not really. If shit could be worse believe me it would be. And even if you don't agree with me that seems like a strange slogan to hang your hat on. How does, Shit will get worse sound to ya?
.
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/11/ ... -affected/bobevenson wrote:I'm sorry, but I can't comment on something so ridiculous it's hard to believe anybody could take it seriously.
Oh, I'm sorry, maybe North Korea or China can help us out.richardtod wrote:http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/11/ ... -affected/bobevenson wrote:I'm sorry, but I can't comment on something so ridiculous it's hard to believe anybody could take it seriously.
???????