Philosophy Now Forum

Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 07, 2025 6:54 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 06, 2025 11:30 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Sep 06, 2025 9:21 am Even the demonization of literal demons is an epistemic error. It must be, since if God created everything, God created demons. And who are you to judge God's Creation?

Humans didn’t create anything humans are the created in this conception. God's dream, God’s mind.

Without the demonization of demons the demons cease and yet they claim truth by degree of division, you claim evil is good and yet argue against the evil of demonization.

There’s no difference, no division. How could there be when there’s only the Absolute.

Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 07, 2025 4:43 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 06, 2025 11:30 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Sep 06, 2025 9:21 am Even the demonization of literal demons is an epistemic error. It must be, since if God created everything, God created demons. And who are you to judge God's Creation?

Humans didn’t create anything humans are the created in this conception. God's dream, God’s mind.

Without the demonization of demons the demons cease and yet they claim truth by degree of division, you claim evil is good and yet argue against the evil of demonization.

Satan does not reveal his true evil nature but instead hides it behind an attractive or righteous-seeming exterior.
Good deeds, bad deeds, doing is done, no doer there of. No one can read your mind except you. Change happens but nothing changes.


AI
The mind changes through processes like neuroplasticity, allowing the brain to rewire itself by forming new thoughts and behaviors in response to new information, different social situations, or internal monitoring processes like metacognition. Changes can be triggered by external factors such as new evidence or social expectations, or internal processes such as realizing low confidence in a decision or a conflict in personal identity, which leads to the brain correcting its course or conditioning itself into new emotional and thought patterns.

promethean75 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 07, 2025 6:44 pm I count all tonic emotions against me as love. Even the hatred is a form of love. My attacker is in love with his/her power to be an enemy to me. The guy you love to hate and all that.

There really is no such thing as hate... it's all various degrees of love.

Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 07, 2025 6:38 pm E

In your experience the distinction is very real for you.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 07, 2025 11:44 pm

promethean75 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 07, 2025 6:44 pm I count all tonic emotions against me as love. Even the hatred is a form of love. My attacker is in love with his/her power to be an enemy to me. The guy you love to hate and all that.

There really is no such thing as hate... it's all various degrees of love.

I have had the same thoughts.

Hatred is a lesser degree of love compared to another degree of love and yet what remains is love.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 07, 2025 11:46 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 07, 2025 6:38 pm E

In your experience the distinction is very real for you.

You are making the distinction of it being my experience...that is your experience. Regardless of experience distinction remains, for in claiming one experience relative to another the common thread is that they are distinctions. All things occur by the act of distinction for that is what existence is: distinction.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 07, 2025 11:46 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 07, 2025 6:38 pm E

In your experience the distinction is very real for you.

You are making the distinction of it being my experience...that is your experience. Regardless of experience distinction remains, for in claiming one experience relative to another the common thread is that they are distinctions. All things occur by the act of distinction for that is what existence is: distinction.

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 7:11 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 07, 2025 11:46 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 07, 2025 6:38 pm E

In your experience the distinction is very real for you.

You are making the distinction of it being my experience...that is your experience. Regardless of experience distinction remains, for in claiming one experience relative to another the common thread is that they are distinctions. All things occur by the act of distinction for that is what existence is: distinction.

The distinction is born of the mirror effect.

You there is the mirror for me here, really you. You are me and me is you. The distinction is a projection I have created.

Age wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 7:53 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 7:11 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 07, 2025 11:46 pm

You are making the distinction of it being my experience...that is your experience. Regardless of experience distinction remains, for in claiming one experience relative to another the common thread is that they are distinctions. All things occur by the act of distinction for that is what existence is: distinction.

The distinction is born of the mirror effect.

You there is the mirror for me here, really you. You are me and me is you. The distinction is a projection I have created.

But how and why, exactly?