Philosophy Now Forum

.
Are they for real.. or is this a ruse.


Drunken Sailer - Irish Rovers
https://youtu.be/qGyPuey-1Jw?si=MDjnUmcdpWzdCtUf

Lyrics

What will we do with a drunken sailor?
What will we do with a drunken sailor?
What will we do with a drunken sailor?
Early in the mornin'

Way hay and up she rises
Way hay and up she rises
Way hay and up she rises
Early in the mornin'

Shave his belly with a rusty razor
Shave his belly with a rusty razor
Shave his belly with a rusty razor
Early in the mornin'

Way hay and up she rises
Way hay and up she rises
Way hay and up she rises
Early in the mornin'

We'll put him in a long boat 'til he's sober
Put him in a long boat 'til he's sober
Put him in a long boat 'til he's sober
Early in the mornin'

Way hay and up she rises
Way hay and up she rises
Way hay and up she rises
Early in the mornin'

Stick him in the scupper with a hosepipe on him
Stick him in the scupper with a hosepipe on him
Stick him in the scupper with a hosepipe on him
Early in the mornin'

Way hay and up she rises
Way hay and up she rises
Way hay and up she rises
Early in the mornin'

Put him in the bed with the captain's daughter
Put him in the bed with the captain's daughter
Put him in the bed with the captain's daughter
Early in the mornin'

Way hay and up she rises
Way hay and up she rises
Way hay and up she rises
Early in the mornin'

That's what we do with a drunken sailor
That's what we do with a drunken sailor
That's what we do with a drunken sailor
Early in the mornin'

Way hay and up she rises
Way hay and up she rises
Way hay and up she rises
Early in the mornin'

Way hay and up she rises
Way hay and up she rises
Way hay and up she rises
Early in the mornin'

Good night, safe home (thank you)
Thank you
Good night and good luck, thank you

Heisman, Mitchel wrote:• “Although I firmly believe,” wrote Albert Einstein, “that the chasm between Jewish theology and Spinozism can never be bridged, I am not less convinced that Spinoza’s contemplation of the world (‘Weltanschauung’) was thoroughly imbued with the principles and sentiments that characterize so many Jewish intellectuals. I feel I would never have come so near to Spinoza had I not myself been of Jewish extraction and grown up in a Jewish milieu.” I find this rather ironic. Spinoza, author of one of the most radical attempts to overcome Jewish particularity in the name of human universalism, could be considered one of the inventors of “modernity.” Yet, somehow, modernity itself is in some way Jewish. Einstein seems to have felt, contra Spinoza himself, that Jewish-influenced “principles and sentiments” somehow drew him closer to Spinoza’s modern universalism.

Heisman, Mitchel wrote:• Marx is probably the most influential modern example of the famous (and infamous) Jewish proclivity for the left-wing socialistic causes. His vision of a communist culmination of human history that resolves the contradictions of the capitalistic world by turning it upside down was nothing less than a nineteenth century updating of the primal archetype of the first revolution: the Mosaic inversion of the Egyptian pyramid-hierarchy. Marxism could thus be interpreted as a “secularization” of a Biblically based, messianic Weltanschauung. The issue behind secularization concerns the origin of “modern” values. If reason, in itself, cannot decide fundamental values then so-called “secular” values cannot be fundamentally rational. The traditional idea of secularization, most strongly associated with Nietzsche, claimed that the modern idea of progress and its egalitarian values were residues of belief in God; Biblical values without Biblical faith. Modern egalitarianism and modern progress, in his view, were secularizations of Biblical values. And at the root of Biblical values was the slave morality that glorified Jewish national political failure.

Heisman, Mitchel wrote:• Equality would seem to implicate an ultimate trajectory of evolutionary “regression” because equal rights imply the beginning of the end of Darwinian selection. A genuine, progressive implementation of universal equal rights implies the artificial end of natural selection; the systematic unraveling of the mechanism that made the evolution of life possible in the first place. The principle of equality can thus be look at as the principle of the elimination of selection. The idea of “natural right” is pre-Darwinian. It is thus not especially surprising that the “progress” of the modern idea of the individual right to life leads in precisely the opposite direction as the “progress” of natural selection.
The egalitarian elimination of selection is directly tied to the modern notion of leftward “progress” precisely because the gradual accumulation of selections that built life up suggests an equally gradual elimination of selections to unravel life down. The opposite of the modern idea of individual rights is the right of the stronger. Individual rights tend to defend the weaker, while natural selection tends to eliminate the weaker. From some points of view, then, equal rights can be looked upon as the “progress” of genetic maladaptation.

"was nothing less than a nineteenth century updating of the primal archetype of the first revolution: the Mosaic inversion of the Egyptian pyramid-hierarchy. Marxism could thus be interpreted as a “secularization” of a Biblically based, messianic Weltanschauung"

Or one could say instead: that mosaic hierarchy inversion is precisely an example, and not the source, of what Marx was talking about concerning the revolting of classes against each other throughout history.

Instead, this Heisman guy is thinking what Marx has said and pointed out wouldn't exist without and unless judaism had influenced Marx such that he would say and point out such things.

In fact, every time there is social unrest and upheaval of a status-quo ruling class, precisely what Marx explained to exhaustion is happening.

This guy is trying to place Marx inside history when history should be placed inside Marx. One can't even look at history clearly unless it's through a historical materialist lens.

Marx WAS one of the circumcised chosen.

Revolution of the omegas against the alphas of their own kind is the cause - it became global, because there are "victims seeking retribution" in every society.
Judaism is spirituality for victims, an d Marxism is its secular variant....its evolution.

Where did Christianity spread?
In the catacombs among Roman slaves.
Where did Marxism find converts...among the poor and desperate.

Lefties find allies in the enemy of their own kin.....this is why they are for diversity.
They resent their own because they failed to live up to their shared ideal.
A poor Arab will resent rich Arabs, and feel more closer to poor Jews....if not for Islam.

Retards, who cannot challenge a position, and find it clearly articulated, tend to accuse it of being written by AI.
This is the levels we've fallen, in the west.

Of course, casually dismissing it comes easy, but to justify it, is more difficult....so AI is now the scapegoat.

Lewontin's Fallacy persists within the Americano-sphere.

Who comprises the Nobel Prize committee.
Is it immune to politics, or have all the Nobel Prizes been given to those with political connections, approved by the internationalists?

What of Pulizr prizes?
Do the best reporters get them, or the ones with the most connections - those the 'deep state' funds and approves of?

Pistolero wrote: ↑Tue Apr 22, 2025 4:19 pm Who comprises the Nobel Prize committee.
Is it immune to politics, or have all the Nobel Prizes been given to those with political connections, approved by the internationalists?

What of Pulizr prizes?
Do the best reporters get them, or the ones with the most connections - those the 'deep state' funds and approves of?

Nobody of consequence cares about those adulations anymore, so.. moving on.


Leave them to their circle-jerk of affirmative-indifference..

MagsJ wrote: ↑Tue Apr 22, 2025 5:02 pm

Pistolero wrote: ↑Tue Apr 22, 2025 4:19 pm Who comprises the Nobel Prize committee.
Is it immune to politics, or have all the Nobel Prizes been given to those with political connections, approved by the internationalists?

What of Pulizr prizes?
Do the best reporters get them, or the ones with the most connections - those the 'deep state' funds and approves of?

Nobody of consequence cares about those adulations anymore, so.. moving on.


Leave them to their circle-jerk of affirmative-indifference..

But they do care.
They use them to argue that over-representation, in those awards, is evidence of superior IQ.
But it does not explain it.

Response to Peterson's bullshyte on Rogan's podcast.
Joe Rogan Experience #2308 - Jordan Peterson
Classic Abrahamic cuck...shilling for Israel....for the shillings...

Selfish genes progress, through man, into selfish memes.
The "spirit" driving the entire process is survival.
The "sacrifice" is to the collective. The individual supresses himself to gain the collective's cooperative support, multiplying his survival probabilities.

Men are incels because paternalism was replaced by the institutionalization of masculinity, allowing females to return to their original role as gene filtering agencies, only this time worse.
Worse, because the natural limits to feminine sexual power were eliminated by male innovations, such as weapons and contraceptives and abortions., and because females are protected and provided for by the institution, making all males subordinates, that must be approved by the institution via feminine mediation.
Memetic filtering is now added to genetic filtering.
Males are evaluated not only by their fitness markers but their ideological markers. He must be a representative of systemic ideals and values....not a challenger. He must show that he's submitted to the alpha. One way is wealth.
Wealth is a measure of systemic popularity - systemic appreciation.

There is no break between cause & effect.
There's a continuity, a flow....A cause is an arbitrary point in space/time....
Like the cocnept of 'here,' a cause is how a conscious mind cuts away a portion of space/time....calling it 'here'....or locating there a cause for what it subsequently experienced as one, or more, effects.
Even causes are not singular, but multiple.
Multiple causes merge in a point in space/time we recognize as the source of an effect(s).


Cause morphs into an effect.....or to be more precise into multiple effects.

Simpletons always discover "contradictions" in another's positions because their understanding of them is incomplete, or skewed....usually corrupted by their desire to dismiss them.
So the contradictions are in their own understanding of the other's positions, compared to what the other is actually saying.
Unable to see the error in their understanding they project it upon the other, justifying their desire to dismiss them.

Pistolero wrote: ↑Tue Apr 22, 2025 6:00 pm

MagsJ wrote: ↑Tue Apr 22, 2025 5:02 pm

Pistolero wrote: ↑Tue Apr 22, 2025 4:19 pm Who comprises the Nobel Prize committee.
Is it immune to politics, or have all the Nobel Prizes been given to those with political connections, approved by the internationalists?

What of Pulizr prizes?
Do the best reporters get them, or the ones with the most connections - those the 'deep state' funds and approves of?

Nobody of consequence cares about those adulations anymore, so.. moving on.


Leave them to their circle-jerk of affirmative-indifference..

But they do care.
They use them to argue that over-representation, in those awards, is evidence of superior IQ.
But it does not explain it.

Explain what? ..sorry, you’ve lost me.

Explain Jewish over-representation.

Pistolero wrote: ↑Sun Apr 27, 2025 4:57 pm Explain Jewish over-representation.

Nepotism.

Nepotism is tantamount to bullying imo, in the form of subjugating everyone else and relegating them to minions.. without any incentives to innovate or contribute, a global decline will beset the planet.. then it will become apparent, exactly who the capable are and are not.