What if there is no before or after - but just the eternal now

[Martin Peter Clarke]

Bilbo lived in the shire

-Imp

Aye, Tolkein was inspired by Worcester and mine own Warwick.

[Martin Peter Clarke]

Now and then go together like the dualistic division into heaven and earth … Genesis 1:1, KJV.

The NOW, perpetually fragmented by duality until ...

Now then. As in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire.

I know that most shires are in England, but that's about it.

In those two 'Now then' means 'How are you?', followed, may'ap, by a sithee in Yorkshire, where it means 'Look here', in that context.

[Age]

There IS ONLY the eternal 'NOW'.

What about then?

Now and then go together like ...

Then exists Only Now as a memory, with the bonus of lingering effects caused by affects.

Exactly as you just alluded to and pointed out, 'then' exists in thought, only, also known as 'memory'.

[Walker]

There IS ONLY the eternal 'NOW'.

What about then?

Now and then go together like ...

Then exists Only Now as a memory, with the bonus of lingering effects caused by affects.

Exactly as you just alluded to and pointed out, 'then' exists in thought, only, also known as 'memory'.

Therefore Then, which is the Trinity of Now’s first leg, joins the second leg (the Present) and the third leg (the Future), to perceive as no animal can perceive. (Dolphins are smart, but the third leg of NOW is weak in this species that has vestigial legs at best.)

What exactly is, Then the memory? Well, a memory begins with the original perception, which could easily be a misunderstanding of Reality, seeing as that has happened before.

Memories also change due to the effect of proclivities upon perception, e.g., the softening effects of nostalgia.
This makes Then, the first leg of the NOW Trinity, impermanent and thus as real as a dream. This is significant because Then, which is born in misapprehension and subject to revision, also carries the authority of Precedence.

Precedence as a base for memory is unreliable because it can be based on lies repeated many times every day until in memory looking back, they become the way things were.

The second leg of the Trinity of the Eternal NOW is Presentistism, which leads to no regrets and no expectations, and here to discuss that …

[Walker]

Bilbo lived in the shire

-Imp

At first, but his mother was a Took* and her proclivities took him to places he never imagined.

* As I recall from reading, Then.

[Walker]

Now then. As in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire.

I know that most shires are in England, but that's about it.

In those two 'Now then' means 'How are you?', followed, may'ap, by a sithee in Yorkshire, where it means 'Look here', in that context.

I didn't know that.

[Age]

What about then?

Now and then go together like ...

Then exists Only Now as a memory, with the bonus of lingering effects caused by affects.

Exactly as you just alluded to and pointed out, 'then' exists in thought, only, also known as 'memory'.

Therefore Then, which is the Trinity of Now’s first leg, joins the second leg (the Present) and the third leg (the Future), to perceive as no animal can perceive. (Dolphins are smart, but the third leg of NOW is weak in this species that has vestigial legs at best.)

What exactly is, Then the memory?

As I just said, and write, just 'a thought'.

Well, a memory begins with the original perception, which could easily be a misunderstanding of Reality, seeing as that has happened before.

But, this has absolutely nothing at all to do with what I actually said and wrote.

Memories also change due to the effect of proclivities upon perception, e.g., the softening effects of nostalgia.
This makes Then, the first leg of the NOW Trinity, impermanent and thus as real as a dream. This is significant because Then, which is born in misapprehension and subject to revision, also carries the authority of Precedence.

yes you are, again, right.

Precedence as a base for memory is unreliable because it can be based on lies repeated many times every day until in memory looking back, they become the way things were.

Exactly right again. There is only the ever present eternal NOW. 'Then' exists in thought, or memory, alone.

The second leg of the Trinity of the Eternal NOW is Presentistism, which leads to no regrets and no expectations, and here to discuss that …

But, emotions and thoughts say be tell otherwise.

[Impenitent]

Bilbo lived in the shire

-Imp

At first, but his mother was a Took* and her proclivities took him to places he never imagined.

* As I recall from reading, Then.

he was lucky she wasn't a Rook- then he'd be stuck in straight horizontal and vertical lines...

-Imp

[Walker]

Bilbo lived in the shire

-Imp

At first, but his mother was a Took* and her proclivities took him to places he never imagined.

* As I recall from reading, Then.

he was lucky she wasn't a Rook- then he'd be stuck in straight horizontal and vertical lines...

-Imp

… and although as a Rook his inherited, unique hopping talents would have made him an eccentric hobbit, because Belladonna caused a gleam in Pappa Hobbit's eye, Bilbo was never in any danger of ever becoming a Queen, or of becoming one of the hoppits who lived over in the next shire. (Spoken with Edward Horton’s voice)

Edward Horton's voice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJkTqjq ... Ay_qV8ww-6

[Impenitent]

At first, but his mother was a Took* and her proclivities took him to places he never imagined.

* As I recall from reading, Then.

he was lucky she wasn't a Rook- then he'd be stuck in straight horizontal and vertical lines...

-Imp

… and although as a Rook his inherited, unique hopping talents would have made him an eccentric hobbit, because Belladonna caused a gleam in Pappa Hobbit's eye, Bilbo was never in any danger of ever becoming a Queen, or of becoming one of the hoppits who lived over in the next shire. (Spoken with Edward Horton’s voice)

Edward Horton's voice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJkTqjq ... Ay_qV8ww-6

Bilbo was never in danger of becoming a queen? well he did have a flashy ring, all he needed was a dress... maybe a razor to shave his feet...

-Imp

[Walker]

he was lucky she wasn't a Rook- then he'd be stuck in straight horizontal and vertical lines...

-Imp

… and although as a Rook his inherited, unique hopping talents would have made him an eccentric hobbit, because Belladonna caused a gleam in Pappa Hobbit's eye, Bilbo was never in any danger of ever becoming a Queen, or of becoming one of the hoppits who lived over in the next shire. (Spoken with Edward Horton’s voice)

Edward Horton's voice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJkTqjq ... Ay_qV8ww-6

Bilbo was never in danger of becoming a queen? well he did have a flashy ring, all he needed was a dress... maybe a razor to shave his feet...

-Imp

As the potential son of a female Rook, Bilbo could have never become a queen.

As the son of a male hobbit, Bilbo was a pawn and he was content with that, which meant that although he had the potential to be a queen due to the rules of society, Belladonna Took’s adventuresome proclivities that took Bilbo into the unknown also humbled him with a broader horizon, unlike poor Gollum with his obsessive tendencies that gave him no choice.

[Walker]

... maybe a razor to shave his feet...

-Imp

Maybe your queen. These days beards are allowed within the rules, and no one has yet applied lawfare to that in some twisted interpretation to mean that au natural feet must be shaved.

[Impenitent]

but would they let him on a plane?

-Imp

[Walker]

but would they let him on a plane?

-Imp

Of course. He could always get on an airplane, with his feet … whenever Gandalf pushed him into the third leg of NOW, where they parked the planes.