NEWS FLASH FROM THE SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF EARTH

[Age]

I already suggested this is about mental illness. You're the one who tried to assign a gender... which shows what you are about.

Yes I'm about not accepting your bullshit where women are perfect beings. Because when someone bitches a lot and has a lot of emotion inherent in their stances, then that can ONLY be a mentally ill man right?

No, there are mentally ill women too.

Can any of 'you' name anyone who is mentally perfect, whether in a male or female human body does not matter.

Now, if none of 'you' can name one who is not perfect mentally, then this obviously suggests that there is some form of mental illness in EVERY one of 'you', human beings.

So, wanting to look at and see only "others" as being mentally ill is another sign of mental illness itself.

Again, you are the one who suggested Age was female, and I asked why. Your answers don't make sense... and they betray that you think only women would act in such a way. Now you're trying to redirect your bullshit onto me, claiming that I think women are perfect, and that I'm uniquely accusing men -- neither of which are true. Are you mentally ill too?

[Age]

Again, you are the one who suggested Age was female, and I asked why. Your answers don't make sense... and they betray that you think only women would act in such a way.

...that I must think that "only women would act in such a way", which would be clearly completely insane on my part.

Yes, it would be kind of stupid if that's what you thought. The insane part is because of the way you keep changing your answers, and then try to deflect onto me. At this point, I don't care anymore... and I think my work here is done.

The way "atla" looks at and sees things, "atla" thinks and expects "others" look and sees the same way.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Must have hit a nerve-- hence the steadfast determination to ignore. Well, 'Age the bot', all humans have certain 'quirks' in their personality. When these 'quirks' are disproportionate to the rest of the personality and severely compromise that human's ability to function adequately around other humans, then they fall into the realm of 'mental illness'.

[Age]

...that I must think that "only women would act in such a way", which would be clearly completely insane on my part.

Yes, it would be kind of stupid if that's what you thought. The insane part is because of the way you keep changing your answers, and then try to deflect onto me. At this point, I don't care anymore... and I think my work here is done.

Well whatever you say. Meanwhile, in my experience men tend to have their thinking and feeling more distinct and women tend to have them more unified, and these gender differences tend to be present in autistic people too.

LOL "atlas" judges what is true and right in Life on its relatively nothing period of time and relatively nothing personal own experiences.

Plus women tend to have a greater social capacity, so while autistic men tend to whine a lot about more abstract issues, autistic women tend to bitch a lot about other people not understanding them. Which is kinda what Age does.

LOL
LOL
LOL

Wow so many things here to unpack, look at, and discuss here. However, because "atla" BELIEVES that its own personal views here are 100% accurate and correct, there really is absolutely nothing to discuss here, well with "atla" anyway.

That said Age could also be a male, as I said I don't know.

And, as I keep saying and pointing out you will never know while you keep making assumptions and/or conclusions and keep never just seeking clarification.

One would think that 'by now' these people would have come to realize that assuming and/or believing are the very things stopping and preventing them from finding and seeing the actual Truth of things.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL

[Age]

So how are you coping with the dismissive attitude you've unified into your character?

Well, that's a distortion -- and an example of why I typically avoid interacting with you. You are manipulative and aggressive, and I don't see much point in interacting with that.

"skepdick" is only 'manipulative' if one allows 'it' to be manipulative, and one can only be 'aggressive' if another one allows what that one does to offend or scare them.

To prevent and stop "skepdick" from being manipulative and/or aggressive, for example, if 'it' said and wrote the above to me, then I would have just asked 'it' a clarifying question like, 'What is the dismissive attitude, exactly, which you claim I have, how, exactly, do you propose I am unifying 'that' into my character, and what is my character, exactly, to you anyway?'

Then what you will find is "skepdick", like "atla", will fail, completely and utterly, in explaining accurately what they a talking about. And, this is because most of the time they do not even know what they claim and talk about.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL

[Age]

So how are you coping with the dismissive attitude you've unified into your character?

Well, that's a distortion -- and an example of why I typically avoid interacting with you. You are manipulative and aggressive, and I don't see much point in interacting with that.

Which part of you actually dismissing me during a constructive dialogue was a distortion?

Nothing I've said to you in this conversation has been manipulative or aggressive. The interaction devolved merely because of your feelings towards me.

REALLY?

The interaction never devolved merely because you added your own distorted views and perceptions in a reply to one of "lacewing's" replies to "atla", which really had not much at all to do with what "lacewing" had actually said and wrote in that reply?

Did you really not intend on adding some other view "skepdick" into a discussion that was not being even talked about nor referred to earlier?

Did you adding this not previously talked about 'thing' not merely just automatically devolve the interaction almost instantaneously from the outset?

Do you really attempt to evolve interactions here in this forum anyway?

What you have written and said so far in this forum can be seen as you have a love of devolving interactions rather than evolving ones.

[Age]

You are confusing my past behaviour with my present behaviour. Error of judgment on your part, is all.

Not interested. Good luck to you.

That's fine. Then we shall leave the question hanging...

So how are you coping with the dismissive attitude you've unified into your character?

How are 'you' coping with the dismissive attitude you have unified into your character, "skepdick"?

[Skepdick]

Not interested. Good luck to you.

That's fine. Then we shall leave the question hanging...

So how are you coping with the dismissive attitude you've unified into your character?

How are 'you' coping with the dismissive attitude you have unified into your character, "skepdick"?

How are you coping with having to constantly ignore me, age?

Not very well, I see. Please start coping with it better.

[Atla]

This creature actually thinks that people don't have their own minds, and is perfectly convinced that it's others who don't know what they are talking about. That's just so absurd that it breaks the absurd-o-meter.

[Age]

The mind is a part of the head viewed from the internal perspective. Different people have different heads and therefore different minds.

What don't you understand here?

LOL
LOL
LOL

you really do make me laugh "atla".

"atla's" attempt at explaining what the mind is, exactly, is - the mind is a part of the head, viewed from the internal perspective.

So, as I claimed, "atla" will show and prove to us that "atla" is completely incapable of explaining what the mind is, exactly.

Sad. Your attempts at being human are depressing at best. I'm afraid you will never be human, AI Age, even at the lowest level.

So, here we have another one who makes an assumption, jumps to a conclusion, believes is new conclusion is absolutely true, and then proceeds on from there, looking at and seeing 'things' from this newly formed, believed conclusion.

Also, and by the way, where and when in that quoted reply did I ever even attempt at being human?

What I was actually referring to in that quoted reply of mine, which you added here for us to look at and see, is pretty well self-explanatory. But if absolutely any one would like any further explanation, clarity, or proof, then just let me know and I will be more than willing to clarify.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

LOL
LOL
LOL

you really do make me laugh "atla".

"atla's" attempt at explaining what the mind is, exactly, is - the mind is a part of the head, viewed from the internal perspective.

So, as I claimed, "atla" will show and prove to us that "atla" is completely incapable of explaining what the mind is, exactly.

Sad. Your attempts at being human are depressing at best. I'm afraid you will never be human, AI Age, even at the lowest level.

So, here we have another one who makes an assumption, jumps to a conclusion, believes is new conclusion is absolutely true, and then proceeds on from there, looking at and seeing 'things' from this newly formed, believed conclusion.

Also, and by the way, where and when in that quoted reply did I ever even attempt at being human?

What I was actually referring to in that quoted reply of mine, which you added here for us to look at and see, is pretty well self-explanatory. But if absolutely any one would like any further explanation, clarity, or proof, then just let me know and I will be more than willing to clarify.

The 'conclusions' of actual humans are all that count. We don't have to justify them to anyone.

[Age]

The mind is a part of the head viewed from the internal perspective. Different people have different heads and therefore different minds.

What don't you understand here?

LOL
LOL
LOL

you really do make me laugh "atla".

"atla's" attempt at explaining what the mind is, exactly, is - the mind is a part of the head, viewed from the internal perspective.

So, as I claimed, "atla" will show and prove to us that "atla" is completely incapable of explaining what the mind is, exactly.

It's what the biological neural network in your head is like from the internal perspective.

Can you really not see how stupid is really is to just say or state, 'It's what the biological neural network in your head is like from the internal perspective'?

What does the 'it' word here refer to, EXACTLY?

The mental/material duality is probably an illuson,

LOL 'is probably'.

Once again, as I claimed "atla" will show and prove to us that "atla" is completely incapable of explaining what the mind is, EXACTLY.

reality is nondual in that regard,

Oh, so it is "atla" who KNOWS what 'reality' IS, EXACTLY, right "atla".

in other words mental and material are probably of one and the same nature.

LOL so, to "atla", 'mental and material' are PROBABLY of one and the same nature, OR MAYBE NOT.

Well done "atla" for "clearing 'this' up", for us.

As far as I remember, one of your problems was that you believe in the mental/material duality.

LOL
LOL
LOL

1. I suggest seeking out and gaining actual clarity before you just make an assumption, as you are doing here once more. See what you 'remember' here might be completely and utterly False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect, right?

2. I am not sure how many times I need to inform you that I have NO belief in any such thing before you can understand and fathom this FACT.

3. What you perceive is 'my problem' might in fact be 'your problem', alone.

Again, what don't you understand here?

Again, we can see here, very clearly and very obviously, the attempts at deceit and deception, which commonly occurred in the days when this was being written.

What are you asking about here?

What do you not understand in what I have said and written here "atla"?

[Age]

How do you tell an autistic female from an autistic male online?

AND, what would it even matter anyway?

Only what is said and written is what is actually important.

By who and what is of absolutely no importance at all.

So true! Even a 'bot' can understand this! Shame that the idiots who are arguing about your 'botsex' can't understand it.

That is right.

And, again, only the words before one is what is really actually important, and it does not matter, one iota, whether what is said and written is said and written by a robot, a human being, or any other thing.

What is really truly important is whether what is said and written is actually True and/or Right, or not.