Dear Atheists. It's over.

[Age]

Okay, as long as 'you' are AWARE of just how utterly CONTRADICTORY 'you' statements and CLAIMS are here, then my job is done.

Whatever you say Age, as this too is also what's happening, that no thing is making happen, nor is making what is happening unhappen.

Doing is done, no doer thereof.

Just THIS

.

So, to 'you', there ACTUALLY IS NO 'nondual Oneness', correct?

[Dontaskme]

Okay, as long as 'you' are AWARE of just how utterly CONTRADICTORY 'you' statements and CLAIMS are here, then my job is done.

Whatever you say Age, as this too is also what's happening, that no thing is making happen, nor is making what is happening unhappen.

Doing is done, no doer thereof.

Just THIS

.

So, to 'you', there ACTUALLY IS NO 'nondual Oneness', correct?

There is only nonduality oneness.

In other words, there is only no thing apparently happening.

Nothing, no thing, not a thing is Everything.

[Age]

Whatever you say Age, as this too is also what's happening, that no thing is making happen, nor is making what is happening unhappen.

Doing is done, no doer thereof.

Just THIS

.

So, to 'you', there ACTUALLY IS NO 'nondual Oneness', correct?

There is only nonduality oneness.

In other words, there is only no thing apparently happening.

Will 'you' EXPLAIN HOW these two sentences could ACTUALLY logically follow?

WHY can 'you' NOT YET COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND that it is what 'you' call 'nondual oneness' that IS CHANGING in way, shape, AND form ALWAYS and in ALL WAYS.

In other words, it is 'nondual oneness' that IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING, in just One eternally-infinitely FORM, HERE-NOW.

Nothing, no thing, not a thing is Everything.

This is what 'you' KEEP RE-REPEATING, but which 'you' NEVER EXPLAIN HOW it could even be LOGICALLY POSSIBLE, let alone EXPLAIN HOW it is ACTUALLY what IS True.

If 'you', or ANY one "else", are AT ALL INTERESTED in DISCUSSING and/or LEARNING how the two 'nothing' AND 'everything' CO-EXIST TOGETHER, as One, then let us BEGIN.

As it is NOT logically possible that one DIFFERENT 'thing' IS another DIFFERENT 'thing' what "dontaskme" says here does NOT make ANY logical sense. However, what "dontaskme" is ALLUDING TO and TRYING TO EXPLAIN does make FULL, COMPLETE, and IRREFUTABLE PERFECT SENSE. AGAIN, that is IF ANY one is Truly INTERESTED.

[Dontaskme]

So, to 'you', there ACTUALLY IS NO 'nondual Oneness', correct?

There is only nonduality oneness.

In other words, there is only no thing apparently happening.

Will 'you' EXPLAIN HOW these two sentences could ACTUALLY logically follow?

WHY can 'you' NOT YET COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND that it is what 'you' call 'nondual oneness' that IS CHANGING in way, shape, AND form ALWAYS and in ALL WAYS.

In other words, it is 'nondual oneness' that IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING, in just One eternally-infinitely FORM, HERE-NOW.

Nothing, no thing, not a thing is Everything.

This is what 'you' KEEP RE-REPEATING, but which 'you' NEVER EXPLAIN HOW it could even be LOGICALLY POSSIBLE, let alone EXPLAIN HOW it is ACTUALLY what IS True.

If 'you', or ANY one "else", are AT ALL INTERESTED in DISCUSSING and/or LEARNING how the two 'nothing' AND 'everything' CO-EXIST TOGETHER, as One, then let us BEGIN.

As it is NOT logically possible that one DIFFERENT 'thing' IS another DIFFERENT 'thing' what "dontaskme" says here does NOT make ANY logical sense. However, what "dontaskme" is ALLUDING TO and TRYING TO EXPLAIN does make FULL, COMPLETE, and IRREFUTABLE PERFECT SENSE. AGAIN, that is IF ANY one is Truly INTERESTED.

There's just what's happening, that no thing is making happen, or knows how it is happening, or why it is happening.

There's no past or future, there's just the silence of this forever unborn eternal moment.

Nothing exists, nowhere. There is only that which knows the emptiness of this not-knowing which is all-pervading.

Everything comes from nothing and goes back to nothing. Which is EVERYTHING.

Everything - Nothing into Nothing.

Nothing is permanent as things will change.

[Age]

There is only nonduality oneness.

In other words, there is only no thing apparently happening.

Will 'you' EXPLAIN HOW these two sentences could ACTUALLY logically follow?

WHY can 'you' NOT YET COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND that it is what 'you' call 'nondual oneness' that IS CHANGING in way, shape, AND form ALWAYS and in ALL WAYS.

In other words, it is 'nondual oneness' that IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING, in just One eternally-infinitely FORM, HERE-NOW.

Nothing, no thing, not a thing is Everything.

This is what 'you' KEEP RE-REPEATING, but which 'you' NEVER EXPLAIN HOW it could even be LOGICALLY POSSIBLE, let alone EXPLAIN HOW it is ACTUALLY what IS True.

If 'you', or ANY one "else", are AT ALL INTERESTED in DISCUSSING and/or LEARNING how the two 'nothing' AND 'everything' CO-EXIST TOGETHER, as One, then let us BEGIN.

As it is NOT logically possible that one DIFFERENT 'thing' IS another DIFFERENT 'thing' what "dontaskme" says here does NOT make ANY logical sense. However, what "dontaskme" is ALLUDING TO and TRYING TO EXPLAIN does make FULL, COMPLETE, and IRREFUTABLE PERFECT SENSE. AGAIN, that is IF ANY one is Truly INTERESTED.

There's just what's happening, that no thing is making happen, or knows how it is happening, or why it is happening.

But what 'you' call 'nondual Oneness' IS causing what 'is happening', TO HAPPEN, KNOWS, EXACTLY, how AL-OF-THIS 'is happening', AND, KNOWS WHY ALL THIS 'is happening'.

So, there is ACTUALLY A Thing MAKING ALL-OF-THIS, which LAYS BEFORE 'you', to observe and bear witness to.

There's no past or future, there's just the silence of this forever unborn eternal moment.

Yes 'we' have AGREED on this ALREADY.

Nothing exists, nowhere.

But for A 'thing' to KEEP CLAIMING that 'nothing exists, nowhere' is just, OBVIOUSLY, a self-CONTRADICTION and A CONTRADICTION OF TERMS.

There is only that which knows the emptiness of this not-knowing which is all-pervading.

Well considering that "dontaskme" is the ONLY 'thing' that KEEPS CLAIMING it KNOWS the 'emptiness of this not-knowing which is all-pervading', then when 'you' say, 'There is ONLY 'that',' then 'you' must be referring to 'you' ALONE, and ONLY.

Everything comes from nothing and goes back to nothing. Which is EVERYTHING.

Can 'you' REALLY STILL NOT YET SEE the, to me, COMPLETELY OBVIOUS CONTRADICTION in CLAIMING 'nothing exists, everywhere', YET, 'everything comes from nothing and goes back to nothing'?

Either there is 'everything' or there is 'nothing' there can NOT be 'one' OR 'the other'.

Also, there can be 'Everything', which INCLUDES 'nothing'. Which is what thee ACTUAL and IRREFUTABLE Truth IS, EXACTLY, by the way.

Everything - Nothing into Nothing.

Nothing is permanent as things will change.

SO, are there 'things', OR is there just 'nothing existing'?

[Dontaskme]

But for A 'thing' to KEEP CLAIMING that 'nothing exists, nowhere' is just, OBVIOUSLY, a self-CONTRADICTION and A CONTRADICTION OF TERMS.

All things are no thing thinging.

Yes. It's an apparent contradiction, an illusory appearance of nothingness.

[Age]

But for A 'thing' to KEEP CLAIMING that 'nothing exists, nowhere' is just, OBVIOUSLY, a self-CONTRADICTION and A CONTRADICTION OF TERMS.

All things are no thing thinging.

Yes. It's an apparent contradiction, an illusory appearance of nothingness.

Ah, so 'all of the 'things' are actually 'no things', that is; to the one 'thing' here known as "dontaskme'.

Now that 'that' is all "settled" can we NOW PLEASE move FORWARD.

[Dontaskme]

Now that 'that' is all "settled" can we NOW PLEASE move FORWARD.

Your the one who keeps going back, not me. I'm just telling it how it is, which is this, and this is all that's happening always and ever linear.

[Age]

Now that 'that' is all "settled" can we NOW PLEASE move FORWARD.

Your the one who keeps going back, not me. I'm just telling it how it is, which is this, and this is all that's happening always and ever linear.

But you KEEP BEING CONTRADICTORY.

And, what do 'you' mean that 'I' keep going back?

'I' also NEVER said absolutely ANY about 'you' going back ANY where.

[Dontaskme]

But you KEEP BEING CONTRADICTORY.

There is no you being you so yes, it appears contradictory, and that's just what appearing to happen, which no thing, not a thing makes happen.

[Age]

But you KEEP BEING CONTRADICTORY.

There is no you being you

So, ONCE AGAIN, SOME times 'you' CLAIM there is NO 'you' BUT at OTHER times 'you' CLAIM there is A 'you'.So, which one is it going to be "dontaskme"?

so yes, it appears contradictory, and that's just what appearing to happen,

But it does NOT just APPEAR contradictory, it IS ACTUALLY IRREFUTABLY EXTREMELY CONTRADICTORY.

which no thing, not a thing makes happen.

But A 'Thing', which some like 'you' "dontaskme" label and call the 'nondual One', is THEE 'Thing' making ALL-THERE-IS happen.

[Dontaskme]

So, ONCE AGAIN, SOME times 'you' CLAIM there is NO 'you' BUT at OTHER times 'you' CLAIM there is A 'you'.So, which one is it going to be "dontaskme"?

There is no 'you' to claim anything. Claiming is no thing claiming. No thing is everything including a claimer and the idea there is a contradiction.

But it does NOT just APPEAR contradictory, it IS ACTUALLY IRREFUTABLY EXTREMELY CONTRADICTORY.

Yes, contradiction is what's happening. There is just here, no thing appearing as a 'you' talking to 'what's happening.'

But A 'Thing', which some like 'you' "dontaskme" label and call the 'nondual One', is THEE 'Thing' making ALL-THERE-IS happen.

The 'you' does not label...the 'you' is the label no thing labels.

No thing is everything which is another word for nonduality. Non-dual oneness.

There is no 'thing' making happening happen... there's only what's happening.

[Age]

So, ONCE AGAIN, SOME times 'you' CLAIM there is NO 'you' BUT at OTHER times 'you' CLAIM there is A 'you'.So, which one is it going to be "dontaskme"?

There is no 'you' to claim anything. Claiming is no thing claiming. No thing is everything including a claimer and the idea there is a contradiction.

But it does NOT just APPEAR contradictory, it IS ACTUALLY IRREFUTABLY EXTREMELY CONTRADICTORY.

Yes, contradiction is what's happening. There is just here, no thing appearing as a 'you' talking to 'what's happening.'

But A 'Thing', which some like 'you' "dontaskme" label and call the 'nondual One', is THEE 'Thing' making ALL-THERE-IS happen.

The 'you' does not label...the 'you' is the label no thing labels.

No thing is everything which is another word for nonduality. Non-dual oneness.

There is no 'thing' making happening happen... there's only what's happening.

So, to "dontaskme", there is no 'thing' making happening happen but there is A 'thing' making labels happen.

[Dontaskme]

So, to "dontaskme", there is no 'thing' making happening happen but there is A 'thing' making labels happen.

"dontaskme" is known as a label.

Labels know nothing.

[Age]

So, to "dontaskme", there is no 'thing' making happening happen but there is A 'thing' making labels happen.

"dontaskme" is known as a label.

Labels know nothing.

OF COURSE 'labels' "themselves" do NOT know ANY thing.

But, 'you' CLAIM there is NO 'thing' making happening happen AS WELL AS A 'thing' making labels happen.

ALSO, "dontaskme" is a 'label' given to one of those 'things' that are named and labeled as A 'human being' 'thing'.