Philosophy Now Forum

Walker wrote: ↑Sat Jun 04, 2022 5:15 pm

Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Jun 04, 2022 11:18 am Extermination.

Both entropic daleks and Time Lords move eternally outside of time while manifesting incognito within time, at various times, each to mitigate the effects of the other force.

I was thinking about Uvalde.

Kangaroo Court

“: a mock court in which the principles of law and justice are disregarded or perverted.”

Example: Prime-time propaganda broadcasting concerning the events of Jan. 6, 2021, in which all statements are unchallenged, where any statement can be made except rebuttals, and in which there are no criminal indictments.
This is an example of Political Campaigning.

sophagus must be the non-electronic version of esophagus...

then again

-Imp

regret

As in: I regret takin' age out of the penalty box.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 12:52 am regret

As in: I regret takin' age out of the penalty box.

ONLY because I PROVED you Wrong, AGAIN.

Unless, OF COURSE, you REALLY do BELIEVE that you CAN KNOW, FOR SURE, that there IS, or IS NOT, 'value' in "other's" writings BEFORE you ACTUALLY LOOK AT and READ those writings. Which, if this is what you do ACTUALLY BELIEVE is true, then this MUST BE true AND real, TO YOU.

By the way, it is NOT really that hard NOR complicated for you to put me back on your foe list, is it?

Also, for word or words of the day;

'penalty box', as in, "putting one in the penalty box", which has the implication that one BELIEVES that they are judge or judicator of right and wrong.

Which is Truly HILARIOUS and ENTERTAINING to WATCH and OBSERVE, especially considering what they "themself" ACTUALLY WRITE and SAY here.

Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 1:10 am

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 12:52 am regret

As in: I regret takin' age out of the penalty box.

****ONLY because I PROVED you Wrong, AGAIN.

Unless, OF COURSE, you REALLY do BELIEVE that you CAN KNOW, FOR SURE, that there IS, or IS NOT, 'value' in "other's" writings *BEFORE you ACTUALLY LOOK AT and READ those writings. Which, if this is what you do ACTUALLY BELIEVE is true, then this MUST BE true AND real, TO YOU.

By the way, **it is NOT really that hard NOR complicated for you to put me back on your foe list, is it?

Also, for word or words of the day;

***'penalty box', as in, "putting one in the penalty box, which has the implication that one BELIEVES that they are judge or judicator of right and wrong.

Which is Truly HILARIOUS and ENTERTAINING to WATCH and OBSERVE, especially considering what they "themself" ACTUALLY WRITE and SAY here.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 12:50 am

Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 12:44 am

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 7:48 pm I know -- as fact -- there's nuthin' of value in that exchange.

SO, without reading what has been written, the one here known as "henry quirk" CLAIMS that it CAN KNOW, FOR SURE, if there IS, or IS NOT, ABSOLUTELY ANY 'value' AT ALL in those UNSEEN written works.

No.

After throwin' the lot of you out of the box: *I read the exchange.

It's worthless.

**You want back in?

***Nope. It means I'm the Judge of what I find worthless.

****Dream on.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 1:24 am

Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 1:10 am

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 12:52 am regret

As in: I regret takin' age out of the penalty box.

****ONLY because I PROVED you Wrong, AGAIN.

Unless, OF COURSE, you REALLY do BELIEVE that you CAN KNOW, FOR SURE, that there IS, or IS NOT, 'value' in "other's" writings *BEFORE you ACTUALLY LOOK AT and READ those writings. Which, if this is what you do ACTUALLY BELIEVE is true, then this MUST BE true AND real, TO YOU.

By the way, **it is NOT really that hard NOR complicated for you to put me back on your foe list, is it?

Also, for word or words of the day;

***'penalty box', as in, "putting one in the penalty box, which has the implication that one BELIEVES that they are judge or judicator of right and wrong.

Which is Truly HILARIOUS and ENTERTAINING to WATCH and OBSERVE, especially considering what they "themself" ACTUALLY WRITE and SAY here.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 12:50 am

Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 12:44 am
SO, without reading what has been written, the one here known as "henry quirk" CLAIMS that it CAN KNOW, FOR SURE, if there IS, or IS NOT, ABSOLUTELY ANY 'value' AT ALL in those UNSEEN written works.

No.

After throwin' the lot of you out of the box: *I read the exchange.

It's worthless.

**You want back in?

LOL I do NOT CARE ONE IOTA.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 1:24 am ***Nope. It means I'm the Judge of what I find worthless.

ONCE AGAIN, you can NEVER KNOW, FOR SURE, and thus could NEVER JUDGE, what IS 'worthless' or NOT, in writings, if you NEVER ACTUALLY READ the writings themselves.

When will this EVER SINK IN and BE UNDERSTOOD?

It SHOULD BE BLATANTLY OBVIOUS and NOT even NEED MENTIONING. But you seem to be completely and utterly IGNORANT of this IRREFUTABLE Fact.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 1:24 am ****Dream on.

It is HERE for ALL to LOOK AT, SEE, and JUDGE. And, if ANY one wants to think that I did NOT PROVE "henry quirk" Wrong here, then PLEASE FEEL FREE to SPEAK UP and DEFEND your position. As, OBVIOUSLY, "henry quirk" has NOT, or is NOT YET CAPABLE of doing so itself.

Impenitent wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 11:50 pm sophagus must be the non-electronic version of esophagus...

then again

-Imp

It's also the same place that we get asparagus from. Who would ever have thought surgeons would end up also being farmers?

I love you atto.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 6:47 pm I love you atto.

Well, it's about time somebody did!

attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed Jun 22, 2022 9:30 am

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 6:47 pm I love you atto.

Well, it's about time somebody did!

Roe
6-24-22

6-2=4
4-2=2

42
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(number)

Nonsense

Dumb cow

Walker wrote: ↑Sat Jun 25, 2022 7:38 amDumb cow

Wrong.

It's hard to get a handle on what's going on from inside a cow.

Pretentious twit..