Page 6 of 9
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:48 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:48 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:47 pm
Because it's possible that it will be found. One's belief could turn out to be wrong.
On what evidence (none whatsoever!) do you believe that evidence WILL be found?
Believing it's possible that it will be found is different than believing that it will be found.
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:48 pm
by Skepdick
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:48 pm
If the evidence is the needle, no difference. If the evidence is a consequence of it, then it's finding something connected to it instead.
What sort of consequence of a needle do you expect to find in a haystack?
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:49 pm
by Skepdick
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:48 pm
Believing it's possible that it will be found is different than believing that it will be found.
The word "possible" is a red herring.
Try again.
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:49 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:48 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:48 pm
If the evidence is the needle, no difference. If the evidence is a consequence of it, then it's finding something connected to it instead.
What sort of consequence of a needle do you expect to find in a haystack?
None. I'm not talking just about a needle in a haystack.
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:50 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:49 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:48 pm
Believing it's possible that it will be found is different than believing that it will be found.
The word "possible" is a red herring.
Try again.
Why would it be a red herring?
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:50 pm
by Skepdick
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:49 pm
None. I'm not talking just about a needle in a haystack.
You are lying. The conversation is ONLY about the scenario which both of us have agreed to.
Don't be moving goal posts now.
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:51 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:50 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:49 pm
None. I'm not talking just about a needle in a haystack.
You are lying
lol from the person always talking about charity. Be serious or I'm not bothering with this any longer.
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:52 pm
by Skepdick
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:51 pm
lol from the person always talking about charity. Be serious or I'm not bothering with this any longer.
It's incredibly uncharitable to shift the goal posts.
Bow out, like the bullshitter you are. Same as all Philosophers.
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:54 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:52 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:51 pm
lol from the person always talking about charity. Be serious or I'm not bothering with this any longer.
It's incredibly uncharitable to shift the goal posts.
Bow out, like the bullshitter you are. Same as all Philosophers.
How is it shifting goalposts?
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:56 pm
by Skepdick
Attempting to re-frame the discussion from the particular to the general.
How is it not?
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:59 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:56 pm
Attempting to re-frame the discussion from the particular to the general.
How is it not?
Talking about possibility is shifting it from particular to general?
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:00 pm
by Skepdick
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:59 pm
Talking about possibility is shifting it from particular to general?
Looks like you are keeping your gold medal.
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:02 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:00 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:59 pm
Talking about possibility is shifting it from particular to general?
Looks like you are keeping your gold medal.
Ah-- I missed a post; I wasn't even reading what you were quoting. Why didn't you answer why "possible" would be a red herring? That's what I thought your replies were addressing.
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:06 pm
by Terrapin Station
Re saying that I'm lying about not just talking about a needle in a haystack--so you think I was literally just talking about that instead of taking it to just be an example?
If you wanted to just talk about literal needles in haystacks for some reason then sure, I misread that. If we're literally talking about needles in haystacks then I don't care either way. Couldn't care less if there's a needle in it, I'm not going to be looking for one, etc.
Re: Richard Rorty
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 6:12 pm
by Skepdick
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:06 pm
Re saying that I'm lying about not just talking about a needle in a haystack--so you think I was literally just talking about that instead of taking it to just be an example?
If you wanted to just talk about literal needles in haystacks for some reason then sure, I misread that. If we're literally talking about needles in haystacks then I don't care either way. Couldn't care less if there's a needle in it, I'm not going to be looking for one, etc.
It's a thought experiment about predicting one's own behaviour.
You could apply it to anything which you are pursuing for which you presently lack evidence of existence.
Cure for cancer/alzheimers.
Theory of everything in physics.
World peace.
Pick your example. You are still unable to account for the lack of causal behaviour between one's beliefs and one's actions.