Trump's loss is by more than 4 million people...

[commonsense]

BTW—The volume of commercial advertising exceeded the content in the above article, but Valentine might be a statistics expert.

Sorry about that.

I have an ad blocker. Some sites will block you right back if you have a blocker, but the ad blocker can be shut off, which allows the distractions at your discretion. I just assumed you were hip to that, dude.

you can also disable javascript: doin' that the generally kills ads & popups

downside is: some sites won't load...but, most will, cleaner, faster, and ad-free

But knowing that a site is heavy on advertising can be a factor in evaluating the credibility.

[henry quirk]

Sorry about that.

I have an ad blocker. Some sites will block you right back if you have a blocker, but the ad blocker can be shut off, which allows the distractions at your discretion. I just assumed you were hip to that, dude.

you can also disable javascript: doin' that the generally kills ads & popups

downside is: some sites won't load...but, most will, cleaner, faster, and ad-free

But knowing that a site is heavy on advertising can be a factor in evaluating the credibility.

whatever, guy

[Walker]

Actuarial forensics applied to the known facts does not support that theory.

Neither does the lack of transparency evidenced by baring poll observers.

The only evidence of Trump hatred is the grumbling of outplayed countries, the rantings of left leaning media outlets, the machinations of trough feeding swamp dwellers, and the gullible wokies.

There are an awful lot of wokies out there.

there's not as many as you think (as they would have you believe)...they got good marketing is all

Hi Henry. Good to hear you didn’t float away in one of those many hurricanes.

Every time I’ve been in United States airports, this is the default television network on the monitors for national and international travelers to observe.

It’s a “Leftist” network.

I suspect this is a source for many in the world to derive their interpretations of the US. It’s unwise to underestimate the effects of relentless, present-time media propaganda framed from all angles, and certainly folks consider wisdom worthwhile.

Sample video of this network, with commentary by a “Conservative” website:

CNN Faces Backlash Barrage for Denigrating Holocaust: ‘Amanpour Must Be Fired’
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/202 ... -be-fired/

[henry quirk]

Hi Henry. Good to hear you didn’t float away in one of those many hurricanes.

we had an unusual season, that's for sure

must be ORANGE MAN's fault


It’s a “Leftist” network.

nowadays, which one isn't?

information age, my ass...it's the propaganda age

[commonsense]

you can also disable javascript: doin' that the generally kills ads & popups

downside is: some sites won't load...but, most will, cleaner, faster, and ad-free

But knowing that a site is heavy on advertising can be a factor in evaluating the credibility.

whatever, guy

If content is intertwined with monetary interests, is that now OK with you?

[henry quirk]

But knowing that a site is heavy on advertising can be a factor in evaluating the credibility.

whatever, guy

If content is intertwined with monetary interests, is that now OK with you?

hey, if your standard of content validity rests on the presence of or lack of ads, go for it

me, I don't trust any of it, ads or no ads

[commonsense]

whatever, guy

If content is intertwined with monetary interests, is that now OK with you?

hey, if your standard of content validity rests on the presence of or lack of ads, go for it

me, I don't trust any of it, ads or no ads

Got it. Thanks.

[FlashDangerpants]

- Big Data to the Rescue: The Electoral College Meets Data Pattern Science[/i]
https://www.americanthinker.com/article ... ience.html

* Big tech shall determine who and what is spoken to America.

BTW—The volume of commercial advertising exceeded the content in the above article, but Valentine might be a statistics expert.

He is a statistics expert, which is why he knows perfectly well that he is presenting bullshit packaged for the confusion of rubes. The analysis he sort of describes - ignoring the nonsense at the start about coin flips because there's no possible excuse for running a monte carlo sim in this excercise uses obviously incomplete data, which is forgivable given the timing, but the actual data definitely will not resemble what he describes at all.

He's alleging that there is a uniform swing from Repub to Dem across all constituencies, which is laughably stupid and obviously not going to be true. Later he will need to account for that not being true, which he will do by cherry picking the constituencies that do match the pattern he describes and excluding the vast majority of constituencies from his analysis. That analysis will be the actual fraud. All of this is why he is making those allegations without showing the dataset he is analysing.

[Walker]

- Big Data to the Rescue: The Electoral College Meets Data Pattern Science[/i]
https://www.americanthinker.com/article ... ience.html

* Big tech shall determine who and what is spoken to America.

BTW—The volume of commercial advertising exceeded the content in the above article, but Valentine might be a statistics expert.

He is a statistics expert, which is why he knows perfectly well that he is presenting bullshit packaged for the confusion of rubes. The analysis he sort of describes - ignoring the nonsense at the start about coin flips because there's no possible excuse for running a monte carlo sim in this excercise uses obviously incomplete data, which is forgivable given the timing, but the actual data definitely will not resemble what he describes at all.

He's alleging that there is a uniform swing from Repub to Dem across all constituencies, which is laughably stupid and obviously not going to be true. Later he will need to account for that not being true, which he will do by cherry picking the constituencies that do match the pattern he describes and excluding the vast majority of constituencies from his analysis. That analysis will be the actual fraud. All of this is why he is making those allegations without showing the dataset he is analysing.

Interesting.

On a related note, does this analysis take into account, The Kraken?

Check Sidney Powell, The Kraken

[FlashDangerpants]

BTW—The volume of commercial advertising exceeded the content in the above article, but Valentine might be a statistics expert.

He is a statistics expert, which is why he knows perfectly well that he is presenting bullshit packaged for the confusion of rubes. The analysis he sort of describes - ignoring the nonsense at the start about coin flips because there's no possible excuse for running a monte carlo sim in this excercise uses obviously incomplete data, which is forgivable given the timing, but the actual data definitely will not resemble what he describes at all.

He's alleging that there is a uniform swing from Repub to Dem across all constituencies, which is laughably stupid and obviously not going to be true. Later he will need to account for that not being true, which he will do by cherry picking the constituencies that do match the pattern he describes and excluding the vast majority of constituencies from his analysis. That analysis will be the actual fraud. All of this is why he is making those allegations without showing the dataset he is analysing.

Interesting.

On a related note, does this analysis take into account, The Kraken?

Check Sidney Powell, The Kraken

Lol, those machines shouldn't be in use and open government sorts have been complaining about them for years. But the Trump campaign is clutching at straws with this one. Sydney Powell is a notorious mouthpiece for conspiracy bullshit and is just doing the same again.

Nearly all the states keep a paper record of their voted to go with the electronic one, so the fraud she describes would be suicidally stupid.

At some point you loons should just consider the possibility that the president with the longest streak of negative polling on record lost an election in the normal way, democratically, by being unpopular, because many people genuinely don't like him all that much.

[Walker]

Well, even the corrupted election results disproved the polls and further discredited the polling profession. That's a fact, Jack.

Interesting again. What’s well known is the mental health of the Democrat’s pick for president. It’s especially known by the Dem ones.

Think about it though. What a show of power by the Left. If they can get a corrupt, senile hack elected, who was rescued from the trash-heap of politics by Obama ... they could have probably voted for a dead man and got him elected. They had plenty of dead men voting with them.

By loons, you must mean those who support all the good things that D.J. Trump has done with the opportunity to serve in his nation’s highest office.

Coincidentally, as you must have been composing the sharing of your inner wisdom minus information, a method of wisdom that has even been advocated in this thread, the loons of your imagination, toting along their old people and their children, converged on the nation’s capitol for peaceful demonstration of their message, for all to see their support.

Just people. Quite a few of them, actually. Check it out.
In your cleverness, you might be inclined to call them a flock of loons.

The poor loons were physically attacked by those who would have rioted had Trump been declared the initial winner. Boarded up store fronts in cities. There is evidence of this, for those who take the time to access information concerning the world in which they live, rather than referencing some ideological notion rattling around in the noggin of the way things should be.

The Left will likely treat these incidents of organized attack on peaceful, demonstrating citizens as random, unorganized acts of violence.

Pity the loons who walk amongst the sharks, in a crowd, where a sucker punch can come from any angle.

[Walker]

Nearly all the states keep a paper record of their voted to go with the electronic one, so the fraud she describes would be suicidally stupid.

Not at all. Blatant corruption is the Left’s MO now.

Here’s a video confession of other corruption with no consequences.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3Ibbq_LG-4

[Walker]

No one I know wants to defund the police!

Portland Commissioner Jo Ann Hardesty has called for $18 million in cuts to Portland's police department and has said most 911 calls are unnecessary.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... river.html

But they are necessary for the ruling class ...

[commonsense]

Well, even the corrupted election results disproved the polls and further discredited the polling profession. That's a fact, Jack.

Interesting again. What’s well known is the mental health of the Democrat’s pick for president. It’s especially known by the Dem ones.

Think about it though. What a show of power by the Left. If they can get a corrupt, senile hack elected, who was rescued from the trash-heap of politics by Obama ... they could have probably voted for a dead man and got him elected. They had plenty of dead men voting with them.

By loons, you must mean those who support all the good things that D.J. Trump has done with the opportunity to serve in his nation’s highest office.

Coincidentally, as you must have been composing the sharing of your inner wisdom minus information, a method of wisdom that has even been advocated in this thread, the loons of your imagination, toting along their old people and their children, converged on the nation’s capitol for peaceful demonstration of their message, for all to see their support.

Just people. Quite a few of them, actually. Check it out.
In your cleverness, you might be inclined to call them a flock of loons.

The poor loons were physically attacked by those who would have rioted had Trump been declared the initial winner. Boarded up store fronts in cities. There is evidence of this, for those who take the time to access information concerning the world in which they live, rather than referencing some ideological notion rattling around in the noggin of the way things should be.

The Left will likely treat these incidents of organized attack on peaceful, demonstrating citizens as random, unorganized acts of violence.

Pity the loons who walk amongst the sharks, in a crowd, where a sucker punch can come from any angle.

Whaaaaat?

[Walker]

Is the question for me or the universe?