Philosophy Now Forum

Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 2:19 am

Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:52 am

Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 5:30 am
Note I stated the following earlier;

Homosexuality is not inherently harmful albeit immoral in principle.
However as I had stated above,

You can scream ans stamp your feet as much as you like.
You are nothing more than a little pathetic queer basher.
Declaring homosexuality as immoral is homophobic. That is what homophobia looks like you stupid dumb fuckwit

You are the stupid idiotic fuckwit.

homophobe: a person who hates, fears, or scorns gay people or gay sexual orientation.

It is obvious homosexuality is a biological variance from the norm of sexuality just like dwarfism with heights of people and any other variances from the norm/majority.

ALL mammals exhibit homosexuality.
It is completely normal.
You need to distinguish between morality and biology.
You have NO justification to condemn homosexuality on any basis.

Sculptor wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 3:18 pm

Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 2:19 am

Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:52 am

You can scream ans stamp your feet as much as you like.
You are nothing more than a little pathetic queer basher.
Declaring homosexuality as immoral is homophobic. That is what homophobia looks like you stupid dumb fuckwit

You are the stupid idiotic fuckwit.

homophobe: a person who hates, fears, or scorns gay people or gay sexual orientation.

It is obvious homosexuality is a biological variance from the norm of sexuality just like dwarfism with heights of people and any other variances from the norm/majority.

ALL mammals exhibit homosexuality.
It is completely normal.
You need to distinguish between morality and biology.
You have NO justification to condemn homosexuality on any basis.

Homosexuality might soon become more moral than heterosexuality, because homosexual sex does not cause reproduction.

Dwarfism might become very desirable if it were discovered that it's genetically linked to immunity to viral diseases.

Sculptor wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 3:18 pm

Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 2:19 am

Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:52 am

You can scream ans stamp your feet as much as you like.
You are nothing more than a little pathetic queer basher.
Declaring homosexuality as immoral is homophobic. That is what homophobia looks like you stupid dumb fuckwit

You are the stupid idiotic fuckwit.

homophobe: a person who hates, fears, or scorns gay people or gay sexual orientation.

It is obvious homosexuality is a biological variance from the norm of sexuality just like dwarfism with heights of people and any other variances from the norm/majority.

ALL mammals exhibit homosexuality.
It is completely normal.
You need to distinguish between morality and biology.
You have NO justification to condemn homosexuality on any basis.

Yes, there is homosexuality within mammals,

But, are you familiar with the Principles of Normal Distribution, the Bell Curve.


Whatever quantum that are >2 to 3 sigma of standard deviations are considered relatively 'abnormal' within the NORMAL Distribution.
As I had stated it is a Normal abnormality or deviation from the norm.

Where did I condemn homosexuality at all?
Stating the facts without any derogatory predicates is not a condemnation.

In terms of the principles of morality [as defined] homosexuality is immoral [no malice intended] in principle; homosexuality is not something that is malignant and to be condemned.

Belinda wrote: ↑Thu Sep 24, 2020 12:16 pm

Sculptor wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 3:18 pm

Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 2:19 am
You are the stupid idiotic fuckwit.

homophobe: a person who hates, fears, or scorns gay people or gay sexual orientation.

It is obvious homosexuality is a biological variance from the norm of sexuality just like dwarfism with heights of people and any other variances from the norm/majority.

ALL mammals exhibit homosexuality.
It is completely normal.
You need to distinguish between morality and biology.
You have NO justification to condemn homosexuality on any basis.

Homosexuality might soon become more moral than heterosexuality, because homosexual sex does not cause reproduction.

Not in accordance to the present inferred definition and general accepted principles of morality.
The ultimate purpose of morality is to facilitate the well being of the present generations to be able to produce future generations; heterosexuality as the norm is the only effective mean to at present to produce the next generation.

It is possible that heterosexuality and homosexuality are not moral issues if in the future humanity is able to clone [foolproof] whatever necessary human beings that are appropriate to the survival of the human species.

Dwarfism might become very desirable if it were discovered that it's genetically linked to immunity to viral diseases.

It is possible to be the new normal in the future if and if only those with normal growth at present is getting malignant and fatal and cannot be cured. I don't think this speculation is likely at all.