Re: "What is being presented to the US public as the reasoning?"
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 1:52 am
and effective...
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
and effective...
Do you mean this one.
When the Wind Blows
yes i know of that "Cartoon" - i bought the region B (brit/euroregion) bluray, not offered here in America, so used the Chinese DVDFab (lifetime register of that program) - to stripe the region code bull$hit - and so burn a copyrich free region free dublicate of the legally bought When the Wind Blows that will play on my non region B bluray player). I know of it year prior when YT had it (now they are too anal to allow coryrieched stuff - and why "my channel" 3 yrs ago was removed - i offered brith shows Gideons Way, The Human Jungle, Danger UXB, for americans that did not know of those shows (I saw then in parts via YT 10 yrs ago - bought the DVD's of (some PAL - converted to mp4 via my comptur then uploaded them to my channel in "hi def" (best encode of those shows - better than the former ones on YT - i i do say so myself- lol). MY channel lasted from fall of 2016 to spring of 17 - 6 months - then the copyriech police removed it.Sculptor wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 6:47 pmWhen the Wind Blows
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_the_ ... 1986_film)
Is somehow more chilling due to the naivete of the characters.
Trump doesn't want maniacs with their hands on nuclear: that is precisely what Obama enabled.Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:05 am I'd like to canvas opinions as to why Trump unilaterally dumped Obama's Iran nuclear deal of 2015.
With the entire world scratching its head, whilst urging the US to return to the deal, I wonder whether there was any specific reasoning behind dumping the deal.
Has it proven to be a good idea? How's is working out for the USA?
What is the underlying political philosophy behind the idea, if any?
You seem to be accusing others of what you are yourself guilty of again.
duh.nothing wrote: ↑Fri Mar 13, 2020 2:11 pmYou seem to be accusing others of what you are yourself guilty of again.
Projecting the crimes of Obama onto Trump is not working anymore:
it is markedly the same pathology as the "believers" who religiously blame others
for their own crimes against humanity. No more scapegoating - that Canaanite practice ends here in 2020.
The psychological projection / scapegoating is a mental illness associated with particular M/E ideologies
and is being addressed by a team of Canadian psychologists that know the root. It's being addressed globally,
and those who religiously have relied on it in the past are going to have to get a new hobby/religion, as
pathologically scapegoating the crimes of one onto another is both heinous and abusive.
If/when enmity is present: 'the accuser is the accused' will hold
and this clarification of the illness concerned will effectively stifle it.
Uh oh, now we're into the typical ad hominem slander-by-association. Very "You!-ish".

KOOK ALERTnothing wrote: ↑Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:16 pmUh oh, now we're into the typical ad hominem slander-by-association. Very "You!-ish".
Iran always had a nuclear program, Trump-or-no-Trump. Obama was/is Sausagehood
who wants to commit genocide against all "unbelievers" for not "believing" because
the "believers" are full of hatred, hence their need to pathologically scapegoat
all of their crimes against humanity onto whoever they hate, including Trump.
The default is "Jews" and can change to whoever they hate. "White people" is current.
We are monitoring everything, and can see everything, at all times.
Hatred never wins: it only serves as the footstool for those
who know not to "believe" hatred is ever justified.
2020 is coming.
"Believers" beware.
Yes, we know you are - thank you for the psychological projection
Oh can I play but as someone else? I'm an analyst now.
(x4)
Attempted: guilt/slander by association (pathology rooted in hatred).
QED
Same answer:Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:05 am I'd like to canvas opinions as to why Trump unilaterally dumped Obama's Iran nuclear deal of 2015.
With the entire world scratching its head, whilst urging the US to return to the deal, I wonder whether there was any specific reasoning behind dumping the deal.
Has it proven to be a good idea? How's is working out for the USA?
What is the underlying political philosophy behind the idea, if any?