The Philosophy Discussion Forum

Walker wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 2:40 pm try challenging the thread topic with more than feelings and insult

Take your own advice, Walker:

These insights are to be applied to oneself.
Don't worry so much about other people.

And I'll do you the favor of adding a few more tips for you:

Stop blaming everyone else in your weak "arguments". It's dishonest and childish. Try using more honesty and less arrogance. No one here is fooled by your nonsense the way you apparently are.

It's not even my thread, and when you boil it down, you haven't contributed to it.
I dared to challenge the OP with rationality and facts, and I must say, the countering was weak.
Very weak.

All you do is write about me, and what folks should be doing.
Not a wisp of topicality.
Not even a titch.

Here, take your mind off me for a bit.

Have a laugh.

Walker wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 3:03 pm It's not even my thread, and when you boil it down, you haven't contributed to it.

I think the OP is a very good look at both sides. Interesting and informative. I don't feel compelled to challenge a broad view like that.

However, I did feel compelled to challenge what you said -- and challenging what people say is part of being involved in the discussions here. You do it all the time... RIGHT?

Based on what you said, here were my challenges for you to acknowledge broader truth (as the OP inspires) which you seem to ignore:

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 10, 2018 11:55 am That's sad, that the Left has to hate.
> What causes hatred?
> A: Ignorance.

Lacewing wrote: ↑Tue Jul 10, 2018 4:00 pmDoes hatred mean the same regardless of who it's coming from?

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 10, 2018 11:55 am [No answer]

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 10, 2018 2:56 pmBecause all the Trump denial is hate-based...

Lacewing wrote: ↑Tue Jul 10, 2018 4:00 pmOpposition does not equal hate... /... Does your own opposition always manifest as hate?

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 10, 2018 11:55 am [No answer]

If your statements are true, can you not be honest about exploring them?

Yes, I know. You’re an unlicensed philosophy inspector, with no interest in the topic, who lacks the ability to present the flip side of a dualistic coin so instead distracts with a little picking and nibbling at the edges of off-topic stuff.

So, whatever it is you’re writing about there, maybe you can hone those thoughts in relation to the thread topic, seeing as how I’m off on an exciting adventure that requires full attention to pleasure.

Walker wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 4:20 pm Yes, I know. You’re an unlicensed philosophy inspector, with no interest in the topic, who lacks the ability to present the flip side of a dualistic coin so instead distracts with little a little picking and nibbling at the edges of off-topic stuff.

So, if I'm nibbling at your comments... then I guess they are the off-topic stuff you're referring to.

I don't view things with as much focus on the dualistic coin. That's your trip.

Based on your inability/unwillingness to answer the questions put to you, I guess a sensible conclusion must be attempted without your involvement: You think that ONLY the hate of liberals is based on ignorance, and you think that opposition equals hate because that's how it is for you. And this lop-sided misrepresentation is how you approach all discussions. There was no doubt -- I just wanted to press you to admit it. But such truth is clearly the enemy of many of your claims.

Life makes the best of us fools and hypocrites, at times.

Walker wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 3:03 pm

Some days, I feel a little to the left of the graph.

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 10, 2018 11:36 am Apparently there is a movement of folks leaving the Dems.
They briefly tell their stories, here.

And it’s called, #WalkAway

Dems who woke up.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/OFFICIA ... yCampaign/

You can't be stupid enough not to realise that was too good to be true right?
Anyone with any sense would look at that shit you linked to and know it was going to end up with a shit load of Russian social media bots.
Which of course it does, yet again.

Flash, long time no see. How are you?

Hola DP. how have you been?

The infrequently glorious FPD is in largely good health, although some of the stupidity on this site that shitwits are trying to flog as philosophy is causing my anus to bleed. Which hurts a little.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:57 pm Hola DP. how have you been?

The infrequently glorious FPD is in largely good health, although some of the stupidity on this site that shitwits are trying to flog as philosophy is causing my anus to bleed. Which hurts a little.

Oh, that hit home. I narrowly avoided a colonoscopy this week due to low blood sugar levels. I wanted to get it over with, not out of fear for colorectal cancer, but because I ruined my lining by taking too much glutamine powder, on someone else's suggestion. And now I'm not functioning right. I was so foolish for doing so. Hopefully, I'll get over it with time and a bland diet.

On a brighter note, I'm otherwise okay lol! Good to see you! Great GIF, btw

Addendum... When my dad was on blood thinners, he did this while golfing, poor soul. He's at rest now.

Walker wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 7:28 am

Greta wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 1:34 am There is a constant push and pull between corporate and individual welfare in areas where they don't much intersect. Those who favour more controls of individuals are conservatives and those who favour more freedom for individuals are liberals. From that tussling comes the society we have at any given time as the pendulum swings one way and then another.

"Those who favour more controls of individuals are conservatives ..."

No Greta. It's the opposite. Fewer regulations.

It's part of Trump's platform.

Only liberty for business, but MUCH more control over individuals.

Hence the word "liberal", as in "liberty". Hence conservatives want to control of women's reproduction, sexuality, personal body chemistry, gender expression, artistic expression, plus they tend to throw a LOT more people in prison.

Walker wrote:Thank you for the inspection, inspectour.

My pleasure, doesn't take a D.I. to know that once the political language has dropped to other citizens opposing 'the country' you're on a slide to nowhere. Still, could be good for the rest of us as a new world order could be interesting times at least and the trumpette certainly doesn't side with the idea of the rule of law and Liberal Democracy.

Wanker wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 4:20 pmI’m off on an exciting adventure that requires full attention to pleasure.

Have a good wank.

uwot wrote: ↑Thu Jul 12, 2018 8:10 am

Wanker wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 4:20 pmI’m off on an exciting adventure that requires full attention to pleasure.

Have a good wank.

Don’t feel bad.
Van Jones is a slick poseur and if you don’t follow the news, Leftist spin quickly takes hold as fact through repetition via a complicit house organ called the Leftist media.

(Their latest feeble plan is repetition of the spin that Trump nominated Kavanaugh to the SCOTUS to save himself from impeachment. )

Poor Flash, reduced to crude graphics to express.
Stay on that road and you’ll be scratching in the dirt and saving your urine.

You bet on a bad pony with Jones.
So what.
Shake it off and move on dot org.

As the wise-movie says, human beings should endeavour to persevere ... so rise above your emotional need to be petty.

The whole world will then be a better place.