Walker wrote:
Do your own research. ...

What all trolls say when they've got nothing substantial.
Then post it up when you find it. ...
Will do.
I suggest looking in the public domain.
I'll stick with the broadsheets and the BBC thanks as the 'public domain' appears to be full of the 'public'.
p.s.
Here you go.
The Guardian
"...
Lombardo had previously said law enforcement believed Paddock had perpetrated “a solo act”. But on Wednesday, he appeared to change his position. His speculation about the possibility Paddock was aided came after an exchange in which he conceded investigators had not been able to identify any “person of interest” other than Danley.
He said investigators were, however, pressing to find others who may have been involved. It was possible that Paddock was “a super guy” who was “working out all of this on his own”, Lombardo said. But he added: “It would be hard for me to believe that.”
The comment appeared to earn a veiled rebuke from the agent overseeing the FBI’s investigation.
“Theories are great and everyone can have a theory,” said Aaron Rouse, who runs the bureau’s Las Vegas division, and took to the lectern immediately after the sheriff’s comments. “But I need to deal with facts. The sheriff needs to deal with facts.” He added: “He’s not going to make assumptions. I’m not going to make assumptions.” "
So you meant your Las Vegas Sheriff who apparently deals in speculation and his own personal feelings when investigating a crime. Yee! Haw!!
p.p.s.
No don't tell me MSM.
