If you're doing this as a public show, just put up the link to the thread where you went through all this before. They can see everyone else's responses too, without you wasting anyone's time with the repetition.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:You are so full of crap. You didn't create an argument with Uwot over his use of the word 'twat' because he's useful to you and it was the only thing you could come up with when you couldn't counter my arguments. Simple. So your level of 'offendedness' is dependent on the user. If making a pillock of yourself makes you feel humiliated then perhaps you should stop making a pillock of yourself. (Now we can have an argument about the meaning of 'pillock' if you like).ForCruxSake wrote:What gives you the right to say how I will react? You've already shown you know so little of me, with the incorrect assumptions you've littered about me across other threads.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I'm sure you are fine. You can use the word 'twat' at your leisure. You are no threat to the politically correct. Btw, if you don't follow threads then please don't ask for explanations of them.
But as you've clearly brought it up... and I hope I not stepping out of line here by assuming what uwot would think, or do.... but I doubt I would get into a huge argument over this with uwot. He's a Brit. He would know how offensive the term is and probably agree to having used the term offensively, unlike you who tried to claim it wasn't an expletive, simply a derisory term meaning 'stupid', which YOU then decided to fight over, after two people tried to tell you how offensive it is, here in the UK. (A fight usually involves more than one person... and you are usually the one to start a fight or keep one going.)
But what has this to do with anything on this thread? Or are you just determined to continue with the same nonsense to try and humiliate me across more threads? Didn't we have a conversation about you STOPPING? That you just add credence to the complaints I have to make about you being irrelevant, to thread subjects, and using them to be hateful? Oh yes, it was one sided conversation... because you wouldn't actually confirm that you would stop. And now here you are confirming the opposite.
Thanks for providing evidence, to this community, to support my claim to suggest why you don't belong on this forum: you are pugnacious, to the point of hateful, and add little to the conversation of a particular subject, preferring to subvert it, to promote your own agenda.
Another valuable thing I've learnt from this forum... is that if you make a claim, you need to back it up, not tell your opponent off for being ignorant of the proof. Don't go ripping into uwot, for not following a thread, he has not even been aware of, until you have brought it up, with little reason, out of context.
Twat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see Twat (disambiguation).
The word twat is widely used as a derogatory epithet, especially in British English, referring to a person considered obnoxious or stupid.[1][2] It is also used informally as a verb in British English to mean "to hit or punch a person".[2] In British English and Commonwealth English, it is pronounced /twæt/ to rhyme with that, or sometimes /twɒt/, to rhyme with hot.[3] In North American English, it is pronounced /twɑːt/, to rhyme with squat.[1] Twat is also used in the United States as vulgar slang for the vulva.[1]
Btw, why are you using American slang if you are a 'Brit'? (Whatever a 'Brit' is.) Apparently 'bollocks' means 'testicles'. Does it not 'offend' you when Uwot uses that word?
Do you know what 'projection' is? It's a cheap 'debating' tactic used by fools who love to argue and want to be thought of as clever but either have no argument, or can't be bothered finding one.
Besides, this is issue you seem to be crying out to do all over again. I don't need to do it again.
