Page 6 of 56

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 6:07 pm
by Dontaskme
uwot wrote:
Dontaskme wrote:Nope, that's all there definitely is me old teapot, because there cannot be more than all there is...
Nah. You're jumping from 'That's all there definitely is.' to 'That's definitely all there is.' It's the same mistake Parmenides made. It might be true that thought is all there is, but it isn't definitely true.
But how can anything be a mistake, if everything is just a manifestation of the same wholeness?

What else is there other than the space we're sitting in?

As space, there can be no other space, we don't ever touch anything, because space cannot touch itself...just as the teeth can't bite themselves, or the eyeball cannot look at itself.

No two things have ever made contact, simply because there is nothing to make contact with.

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 6:12 pm
by Harbal
Dontaskme wrote: But how can anything be a mistake,
Paying any attention to you would be an excellent example of one.

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:12 pm
by Dontaskme
Harbal wrote:He doesn't believe in "reality" but doesn't seem to be able to avoid referencing it when he tries to engage with someone.
There is reality but it's purely innocent of any knowledge of itself. It is for the simple reason it can and it is instantaneously now... reality is not for any other reason than just being.

In other words, it's not a conceptual (known via knowledge)reality. A conceptual reality is an illusion appearing within this total not knowing innocence of just being...nothing wrong with any of it.. it's all inclusive of all that is as the whole manifests as it is, and does what it does without error or mistake.

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:58 pm
by Harbal
Dontaskme wrote: There is reality but it's purely innocent of any knowledge
It's similar to you then.

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 8:03 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
Dontaskme wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Dontaskme wrote:
There is no such thing as a Christian.,
I don't give a rat's arse about your "no true scotsman" fallacy.
If a person calls themselves a Christian - that is the person I want to ask this question of.
If someone called them self a ''God''.. would you ask the same question to that person? Or is it only okay that a person can call them self a 'Christian' but not a 'God'

What I'm trying to point out to you, is that there is no such thing as a ''literal existing concept''.:
Well duh. I already told you I don't give a rat's arse for your fallacy.
If a person self identifies as Christian, then part of what they believe is this salvation through suffering.
So excuse me if I put you on ignore; nothing you say is relevant.

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 8:05 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
HexHammer wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:Enough for what?
.........................../facepalm!!!
You obviously don't know the meaning of the remark you made.
You might want to think about it, though I know this is hard for you.

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 8:06 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
IS there no one willing to take up this challenge?

I'd love some person who thinks he is a Christian to try and explain to what higher moral authority did God have to appeal that he had to kill Jesus to save the world?
Then I'd love them to explain how the hell that is supposed to make any sense. How exactly does that work?

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 8:53 pm
by Dubious
Hobbes' Choice wrote:IS there no one willing to take up this challenge?

I'd love some person who thinks he is a Christian to try and explain to what higher moral authority did God have to appeal that he had to kill Jesus to save the world?
Then I'd love them to explain how the hell that is supposed to make any sense. How exactly does that work?
If religions were logical they wouldn't make any sense.

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:09 pm
by Greta
Immanuel Can wrote:
Greta wrote:There's no need for all this brutality and horror - unless there is either 1) no God or 2) God is not what theists think it is and cannot physically intervene.
I'm afraid you're posing a false dichotomy, and a very old one. It's been asked-and-answered many times. There is no reason to think that a forced-to-be-good humanity is ultimately better than one that has the option to do evil but with it acquires freedom.
I'd hardly advocate for humans to be forced to be "good", just to have the tiniest smidgeon of clarity about their circumstances.

Whatever, the evidence is in. If God exists, it is clearly not merciful.

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:17 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
Dubious wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:IS there no one willing to take up this challenge?

I'd love some person who thinks he is a Christian to try and explain to what higher moral authority did God have to appeal that he had to kill Jesus to save the world?
Then I'd love them to explain how the hell that is supposed to make any sense. How exactly does that work?
If religions were logical they wouldn't make any sense.
Is that the best you can do?

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:22 pm
by thedoc
Greta wrote:
Immanuel Can wrote:
Greta wrote:There's no need for all this brutality and horror - unless there is either 1) no God or 2) God is not what theists think it is and cannot physically intervene.
I'm afraid you're posing a false dichotomy, and a very old one. It's been asked-and-answered many times. There is no reason to think that a forced-to-be-good humanity is ultimately better than one that has the option to do evil but with it acquires freedom.
There is an in between option you have not considered - people would still have a choice, but they need clarity about what they were choosing, and that is by no means the case with literally hundreds or more of competing claims.
Are you suggesting that if people had more clarity, they would make better choices? Then why is it that so many make choices in spite of not haveing any clarity?

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:49 pm
by Dubious
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Dubious wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:IS there no one willing to take up this challenge?

I'd love some person who thinks he is a Christian to try and explain to what higher moral authority did God have to appeal that he had to kill Jesus to save the world?
Then I'd love them to explain how the hell that is supposed to make any sense. How exactly does that work?
If religions were logical they wouldn't make any sense.
Is that the best you can do?
Under the circumstances, YES, since your "challenge" makes absolutely NO SENSE!

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:57 pm
by Greta
thedoc wrote:
Greta wrote:
Immanuel Can wrote: I'm afraid you're posing a false dichotomy, and a very old one. It's been asked-and-answered many times. There is no reason to think that a forced-to-be-good humanity is ultimately better than one that has the option to do evil but with it acquires freedom.
There is an in between option you have not considered - people would still have a choice, but they need clarity about what they were choosing, and that is by no means the case with literally hundreds or more of competing claims.
Are you suggesting that if people had more clarity, they would make better choices? Then why is it that so many make choices in spite of not haveing any clarity?
Do you not find clarity helpful? Do you ever, while plagued by clarity, desperately seek confusion and ambiguity? :)

We instinctively seek clarity. This existence is wildly confusing on all levels and generally the best we can manage is to understand enough to survive, breed and be a vaguely sane and/or productive member of society. If there is a God, it's not one that provides either mercy or clarity.

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:59 pm
by Immanuel Can
thedoc wrote:
Greta wrote:There is an in between option you have not considered - people would still have a choice, but they need clarity about what they were choosing, and that is by no means the case with literally hundreds or more of competing claims.
Are you suggesting that if people had more clarity, they would make better choices? Then why is it that so many make choices in spite of not haveing any clarity?
Well, and I would argue that people DO indeed have a great deal of clarity. After all, what would one wish God to do that He has not done? What if He, for example, gave every person an innate knowledge of His existence...as, for example what is said in Romans 1: 18-22 about how there are...

...men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse...

That is, they DO know God exists, they just don't WANT to know. As it continues,

For even though they knew God, they did not honour Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools...

Mankind would rather be "wise" on their own terms than face the truth. So what if the whole Creation displays His design every minute of every day? Moreover, what if He gave to mankind various miracles? What if He gave them His moral laws? What if He gave them prophets and revelations? What if He gave ever human being a conscience that would continually remind them of the good -- and that they were not doing it? And what if He also provided many people who DID know Him and were willing to say so to anyone who would listen? What if, after all that was done, God manifested Himself in human form, and indicated His intention to save mankind in the most unequivocal fashion by dying for humanity?

In fact, the most quoted verse in the entire Bible, John 3:16 reads,

For God so loved the world, that He gave His unique Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.

Now, that goes to the very topic of the strand, doesn't it?

It would seem that mankind has clarity, and God has been unequivocal on his intentions regarding salvation. But has all that been enough to convince people of either the kindness of His intentions or the necessity of salvation?

Apparently not; because people can prefer to exercise their autonomy by rejecting what they really know to be true. So short of a cosmic display of perpetual fireworks, God has done all that could possibly be done while allowing people any kind of choice at all. And to do more would be to destroy the possibility of choice altogether.

In fact, there are already people on this board who are conscious of God, but who would rather curse Him and die than consider for a second that He intends them well. I know, because I have talked with them. They are uninterested in His existence (except to refuse to believe it and to convince others likewise), unconcerned that He must judge the world in righteousness, and that they must give account to Him for every word they said against Him. They hate the very idea of God. And I warrant you, some will even take this opportunity to make their own plight worse.

The truth is that some men and women hate God more than they love life, truth, light or even their own souls. How then can we doubt that God could do practically anything, and some people would use their freedom to deny Him anyway? For clearly, we have illustrations of that truth on hand. There isn't enough "clarity" to convince the willful person of anything. Quite simply, mankind is incredibly devious at fashioning some excuse for denial.

Re: If God is so merciful, then why did Jesus have to be sacrificed?

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:14 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
Dubious wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Dubious wrote:
If religions were logical they wouldn't make any sense.
Is that the best you can do?
Under the circumstances, YES, since your "challenge" makes absolutely NO SENSE!
God nailing himself to a fucking cross to "save" humanity makes no sense.
Explain it as you like.
Describe it as you like, but please explain how the central plank of Christian belief makes any sense.
Go on!
You know This shit; "For God so loved the world, that He gave His unique Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life."