Re: Who Really is an Atheist?
Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 1:14 am
Now here's a first VT, we agree.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Fluff and babble to disguise lack of logic and reason. An old trick.
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Now here's a first VT, we agree.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Fluff and babble to disguise lack of logic and reason. An old trick.
I think he's found more on car 'decals' and slogans.Walker wrote:Actually is goes ... God is in the details.Dalek Prime wrote:'De debble', you say? ''De debble' is in de details.Walker wrote:Could be de debble.
De--de, de-de...Dat's all, folks!
God, you really are an idiot, aren't you?Walker wrote:Maybe there is something to devolution after all.
Leaping like a hungry fish in the shallows. Naw, I don't think that at all. Haven't you noticed the depth of understanding while missing the nuance? Since your contributions have been evolving the thread to a simpler state, one could say a more shallow state, weuns is just joining in the manifest energy, which could likely be classified, even taxonomized.Dalek Prime wrote:God, you really are an idiot, aren't you?Walker wrote:Maybe there is something to devolution after all.
Main meaning: devolution, the transfer of power from a central government to subnational (e.g., state, regional, or local) authorities.
Even in the biological sense, it is all evolution. There is nothing that 'devolves', as doc has already told you, but you're too stupid to understand. What you consider going back to a 'lesser state' is still evolution. You just don't understand the purpose of the evolution, and believe its a step back, so you label it incorrectly.
Oh no it isn't.Walker wrote:Yes it is.uwot wrote:No it isn't.
Can you give any examples of people to whom this has happened, what they felt, and details of how 'everything' changed?Walker wrote:Those who feel the tap know the tapper is God, because everything changes.
Which is right above this sentence. You two fuckwads can't even get definitions right.Nick_A wrote:Walker have you noticed that blind deniers reason only up to a point and then devolve into emotional ad homs?
It seems perfectly normal to believe in evolution or the process of evolving into a higher more unified quality of being. However have you noticed that the opposing process of devolution or involution is ignored simply because the beginning of the process assumes the dreaded G word so it is best ignored. What is the process that created the basis (yin) for the evolution of this marvelous living machine called life on earth which eats itself and reproduces in order to serve its purpose? What creates the blueprint for evolution? The blind denier will call it an accident. But the probability against such an accident is beyond comprehension. Involution or the process of elemental forces involving into creation (lawful unity into diversity) is far more plausible. But contemplating it leads to the initial source of ONE involving into three and so on down the line into creation. So to avoid the dreaded G word blind believers use ad hom attacks. A good example of the devolution of philosophy.
There's probably lots of them lurking about. Do you own research, yes you can, apostrophe.uwot wrote:Oh no it isn't.Walker wrote:Yes it is.uwot wrote:No it isn't.Can you give any examples of people to whom this has happened, what they felt, and details of how 'everything' changed?Walker wrote:Those who feel the tap know the tapper is God, because everything changes.
If you had talent you could make lemonade out of this terrible situation you’re a huffin and puffin.Dalek Prime wrote:What a couple of like minded circle jerkers you are. (Not you, uwot.) You two don't address a fucking thing that's been directed at you. Goodbye, wanks.
Don’t sweat it. The key is the concept of grace, and the best one can do in that regard is cultivate free-flowing energy to maintain awareness of what’s important, i.e., maintaining attention on priorities supportive of life, which you’re obviously keyed into, but which takes minimal attention when guided by conflict-free intent.henry quirk wrote:Walker,
I've never been 'tapped'. Am I not worhty of God's attention, or, am I just doin' so friggin' well He has no need to 'tap' me?
#
vegtax,
You do tend to condemn without explanation. Your favorite dumping ground, as far as I can tell, is 'America/American'. Now, I got no real problem with this...you don't like the country, don't like the people...your business. Don't pretend, however, your hatred is sumthin' other than what is is.
And to think, it could have gone as deep as three taps.Dalek Prime wrote:Now I get why imbeciles like Walker and Nick_A are on the forum. School must be out, and they couldn't find anything better to do then pontificate here, and not answer straightforward questions posed to them.
Okay everyone! Recess time!