Philosophy Now Forum

bobevenson wrote:Intelligent people don't rely on spell-checkers.

Ones with bad-eyesight and a small screen and keyboard do. But hold on there bobby? Didn't you just make a particulary purile post about this subject?

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Intelligent people don't rely on spell-checkers.

Ones with bad-eyesight and a small screen and keyboard do. But hold on there bobby? Didn't you just make a particulary purile post about this subject?

I don't know what the fuck you're talking about, and the word is spelled "puerile" even by the British.

Whoops! My apologies puerile it is then but I thought you hated 'u's bobby.

No surprise you don't understand bobby as you have the memory of a goldfish.

Arising_uk wrote:Whoops! My apologies puerile it is then but I thought you hated 'u's bobby.

No surprise you don't understand bobby as you have the memory of a goldfish.

Well, at least I can spell without a spell-checker or an American taking me by the hand.

But the problem is you can't think bob.

Arising_uk wrote:But the problem is you can't think bob.

Shit, I'm the only person in this forum who can! The only thing I know for sure is that everybody is stupid except me. I'm the only person on Earth who's not stupid, and I can prove it.

bobevenson wrote:

Arising_uk wrote:But the problem is you can't think bob.

Shit, I'm the only person in this forum who can! The only thing I know for sure is that everybody is stupid except me. I'm the only person on Earth who's not stupid, and I can prove it.

The whole world is mad except me said the insane man.

bobevenson wrote: Shit, I'm the only person in this forum who can! The only thing I know for sure is that everybody is stupid except me. I'm the only person on Earth who's not stupid, and I can prove it.

This is what I mean by you being in a pale of thought bobby.

So let's say your statement about stupidity is true. If it is and you are saying you can prove it then this makes you stupid and your statement false. As how will you prove it to the stupid? If you are saying you can prove it to yourself then you are just stupid if you think this constitutes truth or proof and possibly a megalomaniac.

Arising_uk wrote: ... possibly a megalomaniac.

"Possibly"? Um....

Monomanical megalomaniac it is then.

bobevenson wrote:Anybody who doesn't understand a simple paper like "The Ouzo Prophecy" is stupid. Anybody who doesn't understand or agree with the political theory of the AEP is stupid. I think I have properly categorized 99.9% of the world population after only two questions.

We all understand what little there is to understand.

PS, you forgot to use "recurring" in your percentage calculations.

Hobbes' Choice wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Anybody who doesn't understand a simple paper like "The Ouzo Prophecy" is stupid. Anybody who doesn't understand or agree with the political theory of the AEP is stupid. I think I have properly categorized 99.9% of the world population after only two questions.

PS, you forgot to use "recurring" in your percentage calculations.

No, their stupidity is constant!

bobevenson wrote:

Hobbes' Choice wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Anybody who doesn't understand a simple paper like "The Ouzo Prophecy" is stupid. Anybody who doesn't understand or agree with the political theory of the AEP is stupid. I think I have properly categorized 99.9% of the world population after only two questions.

PS, you forgot to use "recurring" in your percentage calculations.

No, their stupidity is constant!

Jesus what a moron.