Philosophy Now Forum

bobevenson wrote:Common property should be split evenly in a divorce, but if some money-digging bitch marries a billionaire and divorces him a year later, the government shouldn't give her 500 million dollars, and a prenuptial agreement shouldn't even be necessary!

If theres's a pre-nup then whats the problem?

Anyhoo, how would you define 'common property'?

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:I've got my computer set at 125%, which I don't think is overly large. A large font in this forum is 150, and I cut it back to 125. Maybe you should adjust your own computer because bold 125 font looks just right to me.

That's because you are a loon who thinks shouting in his head adds import to your words, it doesn't.

Adjust your own computer, idiot!

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Common property should be split evenly in a divorce, but if some money-digging bitch marries a billionaire and divorces him a year later, the government shouldn't give her 500 million dollars, and a prenuptial agreement shouldn't even be necessary!

If theres's a pre-nup then whats the problem?

Anyhoo, how would you define 'common property'?

A prenuptial agreement shouldn't be necessary, and shouldn't have to be periodically updated as is now required. Common property would be like real estate in both names, a common checking account or anything else in both names. And it better be in both names or you're out of luck, baby!

You are missing the point of true love, bob. If you are in love, for real, then you're only concern should be for the welfare of your loved one. Shit happens, I realize, but then don't marry if you are not in love...it's a no brainer. I don't understand the whole marry-for-the-lust idea. If a woman has used a man for money I can pretty much guarantee he used her for her body.

Chris Rock told a divorce judge once that as far as he was concerned, his ex was just a ho he brought home from a bar. The judge replied, " well, there's the problem. ..you brought her home."

And yes...I believe the same goes if the woman is the one with the money.

artisticsolution wrote:You are missing the point of true love, bob.

Fuck true love -- they're all four-letter words!

bobevenson wrote:

artisticsolution wrote:You are missing the point of true love, bob.

Fuck true love -- they're all four-letter words!

What is the basis of your relationship with the missus? (I believe you said you're married)

PhilX

bobevenson wrote:Adjust your own computer, idiot!

It wouldn't make any difference you loon as your posts will always be in bold and large font relatively. It's clear now that you are Bill in disguise and you've just decided to drop your sock-puppet.

Philosophy Explorer wrote:... (I believe you said you're married)
PhilX

LMAO! As if.

Arising_uk wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:... (I believe you said you're married)
PhilX

LMAO! As if.

Well, every dweeb needs somebody he can relate to.

bobevenson wrote:A prenuptial agreement shouldn't be necessary, and shouldn't have to be periodically updated as is now required. Common property would be like real estate in both names, a common checking account or anything else in both names. And it better be in both names or you're out of luck, baby!

So if your billionaire ensured everything was in their own name but the wifey or husband did all the childrearing and housewifery they'd get bugger all if they were traded in for a younger model further down the line?

bobevenson wrote:Well, every dweeb needs somebody he can relate to.

Are you saying you are married!!

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Well, every dweeb needs somebody he can relate to.

Are you saying you are married!!

What I'm saying is that it takes a dweeb to relate to a dweeb, and the two of you are a match made in heaven.

bobevenson wrote:

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Well, every dweeb needs somebody he can relate to.

Are you saying you are married!!

What I'm saying is that it takes a dweeb to relate to a dweeb, and the two of you are a match made in heaven.

Just like you and VT, Bob.

PhilX

bobevenson wrote:What I'm saying is that it takes a dweeb to relate to a dweeb, and the two of you are a match made in heaven.

As usual you display the defining hallmark of the interweeb loon, a complete inability to answer sentences with a question mark. So once more bob, are you married'?

As personally, given what I've met of you upon this forum, I would find myself flabbergasted at such an affair so I wonder if what Px said was true and look to you to confirm or refute it.