Philosophy Now Forum

Arising_uk wrote:*Yawn*

Seek help.

Let me ask you a simple question. What is it that prevents you from asking a specific question about the taxation policy of Evensonomics? It simply isn't normal to just refer to unspecified questions you believe were raised in the past.

They weren't unspecified questions they were very specific questions that you refused to answer. It is not my belief its a fact that I asked you questions about your taxation policy. What was normal was your refusal to reply with any considered answer. Hence I see no good reason to ask you again, as apparently do others.

Arising_uk wrote:They weren't unspecified questions they were very specific questions that you refused to answer. It is not my belief its a fact that I asked you questions about your taxation policy. What was normal was your refusal to reply with any considered answer. Hence I see no good reason to ask you again, as apparently do others.

Ask me a question, and if I don't answer it, I'll go copulate myself, OK? How long do you intend to beat a dead horse? And please, don't refer to others as being afflicted with your disease, whatever it may be.

bobevenson wrote:Ask me a question, and if I don't answer it, I'll go copulate myself, OK? How long do you intend to beat a dead horse? And please, don't refer to others as being afflicted with your disease, whatever it may be.

You really are hard of thought aren't you boob.

This whole conversation has been me telling you why I won't be asking you about your policy as I've already done so and, as is your usual wont, you did not reply with any considered responses. I've told you that if you wish such a conversation with me then at least show that you can change your ways and respond to any of the more considered issues previously raised. You can find them by looking at your past posts.

Until then the only afflictions I have are boredom and some sympathy for your obvious disabilities.

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Ask me a question, and if I don't answer it, I'll go copulate myself, OK? How long do you intend to beat a dead horse? And please, don't refer to others as being afflicted with your disease, whatever it may be.

You really are hard of thought aren't you boob.

This whole conversation has been me telling you why I won't be asking you about your policy as I've already done so and, as is your usual wont, you did not reply with any considered responses. I've told you that if you wish such a conversation with me then at least show that you can change your ways and respond to any of the more considered issues previously raised. You can find them by looking at your past posts.

Until then the only afflictions I have are boredom and some sympathy for your obvious disabilities.

You sure do use a lot of words to say absolutely nothing.

*sigh*

There's no getting past your disabilities is there boob. So I'll leave you as the confirmatory biased, selective reading, delusional godbothering loon that you are.

Arising_uk wrote:*sigh*

There's no getting past your disabilities is there boob. So I'll leave you as the confirmatory biased, selective reading, delusional godbothering loon that you are.

Are you schizophrenic or what? You keep blabbering the same idiotic words and expect different results.

bobevenson wrote:

Arising_uk wrote:*sigh*

There's no getting past your disabilities is there boob. So I'll leave you as the confirmatory biased, selective reading, delusional godbothering loon that you are.

Are you schizophrenic or what? You keep blabbering the same idiotic words and expect different results.

"Blabbering the same idiotic words and expect different results" is not a symptom of schizophrenia.

It's a symptom of being Boob. Evenson this, Evenson that on and on and on ad nauseam...
Pass me a bucket!

chaz wyman wrote: "Blabbering the same idiotic words and expect different results" is not a symptom of schizophrenia.

Try telling that to Albert Einstein, who said, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." I hope you don't mind me calling you the dumbest SOB on the planet.

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote: "Blabbering the same idiotic words and expect different results" is not a symptom of schizophrenia.

Try telling that to Albert Einstein, who said, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." I hope you don't mind me calling you the dumbest SOB on the planet.

In all the time you've been banging on about Ouzo has there ever been a different result?
Incidentally, schizophrenia and insanity are not synonyms.

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote: "Blabbering the same idiotic words and expect different results" is not a symptom of schizophrenia.

Try telling that to Albert Einstein, who said, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." I hope you don't mind me calling you the dumbest SOB on the planet.

No, I don't mind at all. Disapprobation from a fool can be taken without rancour and with some compliment. But I would not expect you to understand that.
Einstein would indeed have called you insane for your ridiculous continual empty pleas for recognition of the non-phenomenon you laughingly call Ouzo.

chaz wyman wrote:

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote: "Blabbering the same idiotic words and expect different results" is not a symptom of schizophrenia.

Try telling that to Albert Einstein, who said, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." I hope you don't mind me calling you the dumbest SOB on the planet.

No, I don't mind at all. Disapprobation from a fool can be taken without rancour and with some compliment. But I would not expect you to understand that.
Einstein would indeed have called you insane for your ridiculous continual empty pleas for recognition of the non-phenomenon you laughingly call Ouzo.

OK, why don't you just call Jesus Christ insane while you're at it?

tillingborn wrote:

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote: "Blabbering the same idiotic words and expect different results" is not a symptom of schizophrenia.

Try telling that to Albert Einstein, who said, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." I hope you don't mind me calling you the dumbest SOB on the planet.

In all the time you've been banging on about Ouzo has there ever been a different result?
Incidentally, schizophrenia and insanity are not synonyms.

Technically, insanity is a legal term, not a clinical term. Anyway, since I'm a prophet, I'm not looking for, nor do I expect, different results.

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:

bobevenson wrote:[
Try telling that to Albert Einstein, who said, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." I hope you don't mind me calling you the dumbest SOB on the planet.

No, I don't mind at all. Disapprobation from a fool can be taken without rancour and with some compliment. But I would not expect you to understand that.
Einstein would indeed have called you insane for your ridiculous continual empty pleas for recognition of the non-phenomenon you laughingly call Ouzo.

OK, why don't you just call Jesus Christ insane while you're at it?

Sorry - I did not know you were claiming to be Jesus this week.

bobevenson wrote:

tillingborn wrote:

bobevenson wrote:[
Try telling that to Albert Einstein, who said, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." I hope you don't mind me calling you the dumbest SOB on the planet.

In all the time you've been banging on about Ouzo has there ever been a different result?
Incidentally, schizophrenia and insanity are not synonyms.

Technically, insanity is a legal term, not a clinical term. Anyway, since I'm a prophet, I'm not looking for, nor do I expect, different results.

That would make you even more stupid.
Yes, that is because you are the 'idiot' as described by Einstein.
The trick is to do something else, not the same thing.
You really don't get it do you!!
That is priceless!!