So, if you do not absolutely believe that you do not believe any thing, absolutely, then okay.Atla wrote: ↑Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:31 amI don't believe anything "absolutely", so you're wrong as usual.Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:27 am'That' tells 'Me' that "atla" believes, absolutely, that it is the smartest one, here.Atla wrote: ↑Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:08 am
I already told you in the previous comment that that wasn't an absolute belief, you failed to comprehend. So this time I told you to show the words themselves, maybe that would work. That didn't work either. I already told you like 100 times that I don't have absolute beliefs, you failed to comprehend 100 times.
Have you ever tried not assuming that what I write are absolute statements? Of course you haven't, you assume all day. Face it, if you're really God then the average human is way smarter than God. That's the only thing you're proving here. What does that tell you?
Or, do you believe that 'I' could actually be smarter than 'you'?
What is your answer, here, now?
you just believe that you do not believe any thing, absolutely, correct?
If yes, then does this mean that you could actually believe some things, absolutely? Or, are you absolutely positive and absolutely sure that you do not absolutely believe that you do not believe any thing, absolutely?
See, if you are not absolutely sure, then you could actually believe some things, absolutely. But, if you are absolutely sure that you do not, then why do you not absolutely believe what you are absolutely sure of?
It is amusing to watch and observe 'the way' your change 'your words', after your inconsistencies and contradictions within them are pointed out, to you.
It just takes you some time before you actually end comprehending and understanding, and can see, what has been been pointing out to you, here.
Okay. But 'you' do not absolutely believe 'this', right?