Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2023 11:52 pm
Yes, reporting counts too, and believing what you are reporting helps make the gossip personally more credible, according to the author.
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Yes, reporting counts too, and believing what you are reporting helps make the gossip personally more credible, according to the author.
What about mine? About the Pen is mightyβ¦did you like the sound of that?
Well, if life is just "tragic," as you suppose, then there's actually no use in teaching them anything at all. Human life has no nobility, and death ends all: who's to care what they believed between the womb and the tomb? In that worldview, there's no rewards for harsh "realism" of that type. One may as well embrace any consolation one can grab...true or not.Alexis Jacobi wrote: βSat Nov 11, 2023 11:41 pm Do we teach them to confront tragic existence boldly and realistically?
Well, to my knowledge, the Bible doesn't explicitly tell us what the disposition of babies is. There are various speculations, but I know of no slam-dunk exegesis that would give us a definite answer. There may be an answer in God's middle knowledge. https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writing ... -knowledge. Or maybe it's not something we particularly need to know, since we have ourselves to look to.
After his crucifixion in order to view the life of Jesus as ecumenically meaningful and not just locally based, an overt purpose had to be constructed as the reason for his execution. The easiest way to give it the credentials of a timeless ecumenical event and not merely another victim of Roman justice was to make everyone a sinner and sinful from birth. As subsequently endorsed, it required the full impact of divinity to annul the irrevocable consequences of our innate sinfulness which is what the sacrifice of Christ on the cross was meant to accomplish. Without our sinfulness as pretext, there would only have been a crucifixion without any need for salvation and Jesus just another daily event among the many thousands executed by the Romans.Lacewing wrote: βSat Nov 11, 2023 11:47 pmAnd I guess the Bible indicates that God will judge them as sinners anyway.
We cannot simply assume that children are βinnocentβ and are therefore exempt from the penalties of sin. The Bible teaches clearly that infants are in a state of sin and need to be regenerated. They, like all humanity, can be saved only through Christ.
Nowhere in the Bible does it clearly state that infants are sinners, it's inferred from King David (who must have known he was a sinner in a previous life..lol) and from Paul in Romans who says all have sinned which also is ridiculous to accept he is including children, unless everyone that has been born are from a reincarnate previously sinful life AND Paul was aware of thatLacewing wrote: βSat Nov 11, 2023 11:47 pm And I guess the Bible indicates that God will judge them as sinners anyway.
We cannot simply assume that children are βinnocentβ and are therefore exempt from the penalties of sin. The Bible teaches clearly that infants are in a state of sin and need to be regenerated. They, like all humanity, can be saved only through Christ.
Then whoever wrote it obviously didn't have kids.attofishpi wrote: βSun Nov 12, 2023 7:09 am
Nowhere in the Bible does it clearly state that infants are sinners,
So, at what age does one become capable of being judged a sinner.attofishpi wrote: βSun Nov 12, 2023 7:09 am Nowhere in the Bible does it clearly state that infants are sinners, it's inferred from King David (who must have known he was a sinner in a previous life..lol) and from Paul in Romans who says all have sinned which also is ridiculous to accept he is including children, unless everyone that has been born are from a reincarnate previously sinful life AND Paul was aware of that![]()
I don't recall ever being taught about what sin is (and to be honest I am still not certain). I was taught the 10 commandments (in RC primary school) around about the age of 11-12 because I remember the teacher and class I was in. I think I assumed, and probably still do, that not adhering to the 10Cs were sin, and the other 'sins' are what we comprehend as morally reprehensible, such as rape. (Maybe Moses ran out of room on his tablet for that one, or God decided 'it goes without saying'!)Iwannaplato wrote: βSun Nov 12, 2023 11:38 amSo, at what age does one become capable of being judged a sinner.attofishpi wrote: βSun Nov 12, 2023 7:09 am Nowhere in the Bible does it clearly state that infants are sinners, it's inferred from King David (who must have known he was a sinner in a previous life..lol) and from Paul in Romans who says all have sinned which also is ridiculous to accept he is including children, unless everyone that has been born are from a reincarnate previously sinful life AND Paul was aware of that![]()
And perhaps parents should be slow to make children conscious of sin. Because at that point, when they get the idea of sin and how it is 'against God' they are often judged accountable. Get hit by a bus the next day and you're going down. But if you can postpone that teaching until they are really good at avoiding busses, you might reduce their chances of eternal damnation. Which seems like something a parent would like to prevent their child from experiencing. In fact, it's almost enough to get one's tubes tied, either set of tubes, in advance.
What do you mean by 'we have ourselves to look to'?Immanuel Can wrote: βSun Nov 12, 2023 5:47 am... maybe it's not something we particularly need to know, since we have ourselves to look to.
You think that secularists don't care about the welfare of babies?Immanuel Can wrote: βSun Nov 12, 2023 5:47 am I don't imagine the secular world, which aborts babies at a rate of millions per year, can much concern themselves with the welfare of babies, though.
]Sounds like a rather gentle version.attofishpi wrote: βSun Nov 12, 2023 11:49 am I don't recall ever being taught about what sin is (and to be honest I am still not certain). I was taught the 10 commandments (in RC primary school) around about the age of 11-12 because I remember the teacher and class I was in. I think I assumed, and probably still do, that not adhering to the 10Cs were sin, and the other 'sins' are what we comprehend as morally reprehensible, such as rape. (Maybe Moses ran out of room on his tablet for that one, or God decided 'it goes without saying'!)
Or kill babies, that is those born. Christian wars have always killed babies and pregnant mothers along with enemy men.Lacewing wrote: βSun Nov 12, 2023 12:15 pmWhat do you mean by 'we have ourselves to look to'?Immanuel Can wrote: βSun Nov 12, 2023 5:47 am... maybe it's not something we particularly need to know, since we have ourselves to look to.
You think that secularists don't care about the welfare of babies?Immanuel Can wrote: βSun Nov 12, 2023 5:47 am I don't imagine the secular world, which aborts babies at a rate of millions per year, can much concern themselves with the welfare of babies, though.
Do you think Christians don't have abortions?