Philosophy Now Forum

Anybody on the Religous-Left who does not now admit... Yes, Wizard and Alexis, you are right, I was wrong...THAT IS WRONG!!!

You expose yourselves and your ideology!

When you Demons come after our children...the Family, all that is Sacred in life, that's when these "cultural" battles turn over.

That's when the lines are crossed. And they are. And they have been for awhile now...

No amount of Hairball's backwalking deference and claptrap, Bri'ish stiff upper-lip ought deter you, Alexis!

Push him back over the cliff!!! Keep the pressure!

I think there migth be some meds you are supposed to take around now Wizzy.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 10:37 pm I think there migth be some meds you are supposed to take around now Wizzy.

So you support signs saying "It's Not Gonna Lick Itself" to children at drag-time story hours???

No surprise there, Scarecrow brain, I knew you defended this sick shit. I want to know where Hairball truly stands.

Scalper already admitted he sees "nothing wrong" with Leftist pedophilia.

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 10:26 pm You will attack and try to knock over, to invalidate or ridicule, what you only understand superficially and partially. What is this … mechanism?

I'm really just mocking you for being so pretentious.

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 10:26 pm
Notice the background: "It's Not Going To Lick Itself".

What is that phrase referring to? Dpants, Scalper, Hairball???

Is it an ice cream convention?

It's referring to a man's anus.

That's certainly more imaginative than my guess.

I enjoy Alexis' style: wordy, patient, complex, used to divert the expectations of the Religious-Left.

A formidable ally with a different approach to these matters. Obviously, I'm less patient, more forceful when it comes to imposing decisions...

We'll see where everybody stands by the time this is over.

Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 6:32 pm If I have misinterpreted the spirit of your comments about homosexuals, I apologise. Is it the case that I have misunderstood your attitude and intentions towards them?

There was no “spirit” in my comments. I said exactly what I thought was of common sense.

My real concern — the ethical questions and possibly the moral questions — revolve around concerns about what happens in a person and a culture when sexuality and sexual passion are uprooted from their •true• functional importance in the context of a productive marriage and family. So, more than criticism of a homosexual couple or an attempt to harm them, ultimately the issue is a different one.

I did write these ideas out in this or some other thread.

I see •the perversion of sexual function• as a powerful tool used for political purposes. Again, and simply put, my argument is Platonic. Uncontrolled, or misdirected, sexuality is destructive in a man’s body. And it carries over to the political body.

However, I have no power at all to interfere with what culture, generally, is doing with sexuality. From my vantage I observe.

Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 10:45 pmThat's certainly more imaginative than my guess.

More feigned innocence...I should have guessed as much.

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 10:47 pm I enjoy Alexis' style: wordy, patient, complex, used to divert the expectations of the Religious-Left.

A formidable ally with a different approach to these matters. Obviously, I'm less patient, more forceful when it comes to imposing decisions...

We'll see where everybody stands by the time this is over.

Division of labour confirmed. Alexis does the posturing and wears the big thinky hat to impress the idiots, you do the goose stepping. Everybody happy.

He still isn't going to give you yor reacharound.

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 10:48 pm my argument is Platonic.

Is it though? What would a Platonic argument be?

Alexis, notice that Hairball, at this point, must play the Fool and pretend, to be stupid, in order to defend his position...

These are what we're up against. Hairball knows he's in the wrong, but he can't admit it openly. He feels the need to defend his Ideology.

He feels a visceral attack.


But we all know his is an indefensible position!

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 10:32 pm When you Demons come after our children...the Family, all that is Sacred in life, that's when these "cultural" battles turn over.

And with this, in its essence, I agree.

It is those possessive and captivating currents that alarm many people today. They notice it, they notice an infiltration, and they see the power it has over children, but they do not quite understand how to battle it. Nor are they sure what they are facing.

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 10:47 pm I enjoy Alexis' style: wordy, patient, complex, used to divert the expectations of the Religious-Left.

A formidable ally with a different approach to these matters. Obviously, I'm less patient, more forceful when it comes to imposing decisions...

We'll see where everybody stands by the time this is over.

So you two are a team now?