Re: Christianity
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:35 am
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Of course. I don't see how else the atoms in my brain and body would effect the will of my mind as they do.
There are psychological/social/historical/anthropological reasons why mumbo jumbo was and still is popular. We also know that modern science is imcomplete.
~ Another one bites the dust ~Harry Baird wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:40 am BigMike, since you're obviously not interested in a dispassionate examination of the evidence and arguments with which I've supplied you, it's time for me to disengage, at least for the moment.
There's no reason why the encyclopaedia of a society formed to study the phenomena in question should be summarily dismissed, especially by a pundit who thinks that the MDC has any relevance, but apparently you're quite comfortable displaying your bias to the world, and if that's your wont, then have at it...
Just before disengaging (for now), though, here's a response to your latest:
Of course. I don't see how else the atoms in my brain and body would effect the will of my mind as they do.
I'll be the judge of that.Harry Baird wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 6:28 amWell, it's also where you part company with the evidence then, hq.
I know some of it. I neither dismiss nor accept it.Maybe you just haven't encountered it in its strongest form before though, so that's completely understandable
I'll give it a look-see.but do check out the book I linked to above at least.
You have never seen the inside of your own brain or body to be able to tell yourself what you think you know.Harry Baird wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:40 am I don't see how else the atoms in my brain and body would effect the will of my mind as they do.
Hi, DAM. For the record, I think you're a lovely person with a heart of gold, but, philosophically, utterly irrational. Thus, I send the lovely person you are my best wishes, but I see no point in engaging with you as an incoherent would-be philosopher.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:48 amYou have never seen the inside of your own brain or body to be able to tell yourself what you think you know.Harry Baird wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:40 am I don't see how else the atoms in my brain and body would effect the will of my mind as they do.
Even when you look inside someone elses brain, via inspection through dissection...you will collapse the whole process of how the brain actually works. No human eye has ever seen an atom, or the inner workings of the brain.
Harry is clearly suffering a mental collapse. He has reached an impasse. It is time for him to plot a new course.Harry Baird wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:54 amHi, DAM. For the record, I think you're a lovely person with a heart of gold, but, philosophically, utterly irrational. Thus, I send the lovely person you are my best wishes, but I see no point in engaging with you as an incoherent would-be philosopher.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:48 amYou have never seen the inside of your own brain or body to be able to tell yourself what you think you know.Harry Baird wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:40 am I don't see how else the atoms in my brain and body would effect the will of my mind as they do.
Even when you look inside someone elses brain, via inspection through dissection...you will collapse the whole process of how the brain actually works. No human eye has ever seen an atom, or the inner workings of the brain.
How about this ...It's a good question, phyllo, and one that I don't have a good answer to. This physical reality is a curious place.phyllo wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:20 am
I wonder why we have physical bodies at all if they are not needed for interaction with physical reality.
Why eyes if we can see without them?
Ah, BigMike, we all enjoy a good case of projection, but are you sure you want to reveal it to the world?
The physical brain cannot support the "emergence" of a mind, so a mind is necessary over and above the physical brain (with which it interacts).
Interacts in what way?Harry Baird wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 12:19 pmThe physical brain cannot support the "emergence" of a mind, so a mind is necessary over and above the physical brain (with which it interacts).
So as to exchange information and directives, etc.phyllo wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 12:23 pmInteracts in what way?Harry Baird wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 12:19 pm The physical brain cannot support the "emergence" of a mind, so a mind is necessary over and above the physical brain (with which it interacts).
Right. And yet we find ourselves in this reality, in which we have bodily eyes, ears, and brains the senses of which are replicated (but even better) when out of body. You can deny it, or you can try to understand it. Do I completely understand it? No. But, for better or worse, this is the way it is.