Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2023 4:27 pm
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
If you're actually interested in the degree to which what you call "sects" of Christianity differ, and more importantly, where they do not, you should perhaps take the time to read C.S. Lewis's famous book Mere Christianity. By "mere," Lewis doesn't mean "only," but rather "stripped down the the basic areas of agreement; devoid of peripherals". His book is very, very readable, understandable, yet profound. And I think you'll find it answers your question rather well.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 4:03 pmFair, enough, then all those sects of Christianity that practice some things differently from each other must be understanding "objective" laws and rules in their own personal "objective" ways that differ from each other.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 3:39 pmThat's because "religions" is a vague, secular, collective term for "things people can believe...other than Atheism." So naturally, there's great variety there.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 2:25 am Strange how laws and rules seem to fluctuate and change in religious societies as well.
Good grief. On behalf of DAM I apologize for such a stupid question.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 4:27 pm"Supreme Being" means, by definition, there's only one.
About what?
Oh yes for sure, nothing really knows all about it.
I am not among that 96%, but trying to see from the point of view of someone who is, I could go in various directions from there, but, knowing where I will inevitably end up, I may as well save time and head straight in your direction.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 4:09 pm
But they're only hints, of course. And they're broad things, like that which tends to flourishing, for example. The problems with them are twofold, at least: first, that they have to be deduced, and something's not always right with the deducer. The second is that even when they are correctly deduced, they tend to cover only very broad cases, leaving too many details to be worked out for us to generate a code of behaviour out of them. But what they do give us is a starting point: the realization that we live in an orderly, purposeful, teleological universe, and hence there is a God who has designed it. This "natural law" kind of knowledge is universal: all ancient cultures throughout history have had it. And even today, the vast majority of people (96% of the world's population, according to CIA Factbook) thinks it's at least possible, and more often likely, that there's a God.
I am assuming that the only account of God and what he has spoken of is in the Bible, is that correct? Maybe we could look at some sample moral issues and see what God has to say about them, but I would be entirely dependent on you to tell me what to look at, and how to understand it. What do you think?So there's another course: God, presuming He exists, would be capable of being more explicit with his instructions than what we have in nature, and could give us the criteria for judging among the gurus, and could impart to us standards that would allow us to judge when our own subjective feelings or consciences were leading us right or wrong. So the question, then, comes down to a simple one: has God spoken? If He has, where would it be, and how would we know it when we found the right source of moral information?
So you have the knowledge that a "like 7-8 year old" might have, and became an Atheist at the ripe old intellectual age of 8?Atla wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 4:56 pmI was a Christian until like age 7-8...
Which last statement?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 6:03 pmSo you have the knowledge that a "like 7-8 year old" might have, and became an Atheist at the ripe old intellectual age of 8?![]()
I wouldn't boast about that, were I you. But it explains a lot...particularly, your last statement.
Atla wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 4:56 pmAbout what?
I was a Christian until like age 7-8, you know that funny belief system where they pretend that they have a 'god' that's not Allah.
That you have no idea of the difference between God and Allah.Atla wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 6:16 pmWhich last statement?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 6:03 pmSo you have the knowledge that a "like 7-8 year old" might have, and became an Atheist at the ripe old intellectual age of 8?![]()
I wouldn't boast about that, were I you. But it explains a lot...particularly, your last statement.![]()
Oh but there is no difference, God = Allah. Did you even pay attention to the Qur'an?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 6:18 pmThat you have no idea of the difference between God and Allah.Atla wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 6:16 pmWhich last statement?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 6:03 pm
So you have the knowledge that a "like 7-8 year old" might have, and became an Atheist at the ripe old intellectual age of 8?![]()
I wouldn't boast about that, were I you. But it explains a lot...particularly, your last statement.![]()
I would have expected that even a Sunday School dropout would know at least that much. Apparently not.