Philosophy Now Forum

Oops, too late.

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 10:29 pm

MagsJ wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 7:18 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Apr 16, 2025 8:05 pm I wonder who the genius is who clicked number two

Me.

That's even more absurd than being a bog standard creationist. So you acknowledge scientific fact except for humans. Everything evolves--except for humans. We just suddenly appeared, fully formed....when, exactly, and from where?

“So you acknowledge scientific fact except for humans. Everything evolves--except for humans. We just suddenly appeared, fully formed....”


I said no such thing.. thanks for your reply.

What many people do not realize is that because of mind, mankind also evolves, extends his own body his reach through technology, i.e., exo-evolution. Thus he is more rapidly adaptive than any other form of life on earth, exo-adaptive is only possible by the power of mind. It is how we go beyond our body. Thus those who claim not to believe in evolution, have to dismiss the fact of technology, even the computer they use.

So, if there is no evolution, why have we always been so hard at it?
So yes, there are two types of evolution. We are by design meant to master the intelligible. This is right in the Bible. Don't that piss people off.

For every action, there is an opposite and equal reaction.
Just think about it.
Exo-evolution is also known as guided evolution.

For every action there is an opposite and equal reaction, is the foundation of correct grammar, the equality is from the perceptible to the intelligible. If you cannot recognize the Universal Binary expressed in the definition of a thing, by which to formulate your understanding of grammar, you cannot even imagine that the only person in history who based grammar on that principle, was Plato, since then, no one has been intelligent enough to figure how how it is done, they cannot even understand Plato enough to follow his demonstrations.

It is the computer, which today, validates everything Plato taught about grammar.

MagsJ wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 5:02 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 10:29 pm

MagsJ wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 7:18 am
Me.

That's even more absurd than being a bog standard creationist. So you acknowledge scientific fact except for humans. Everything evolves--except for humans. We just suddenly appeared, fully formed....when, exactly, and from where?

“So you acknowledge scientific fact except for humans. Everything evolves--except for humans. We just suddenly appeared, fully formed....”


I said no such thing.. thanks for your reply.

Perhaps you should read the poll again.

Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 3:57 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:18 pm Undiluted insanity on full display. It's not a pretty sight

That ain't kind, old thing. Something i struggle with. Just foe them.

What do you mean 'old thing'? That 'ain't kind' either, old fool.

Is this what they call "Pole" dancing?

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 7:47 pm

MagsJ wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 5:02 pm I said no such thing.. thanks for your reply.

Perhaps you should read the poll again.

Perhaps you should respond to what I initially said, and not your interpretation of what you think I said..

..also, why do you come across like your perpetually angry?

MagsJ wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 8:09 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 7:47 pm

MagsJ wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 5:02 pm I said no such thing.. thanks for your reply.

Perhaps you should read the poll again.

Perhaps you should respond to what I initially said, and not your interpretation of what you think I said..

Pathetic attempt at a personal attack.

'Me'. Is that open to 'interpretation'?

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 8:11 pm

MagsJ wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 8:09 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 7:47 pm
Perhaps you should read the poll again.

Perhaps you should respond to what I initially said, and not your interpretation of what you think I said..

Pathetic attempt at a personal attack.

'Me'. Is that open to 'interpretation'?

Bore off, Assinine.

MagsJ wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 8:14 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 8:11 pm

MagsJ wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 8:09 pm
Perhaps you should respond to what I initially said, and not your interpretation of what you think I said..

Pathetic attempt at a personal attack.

'Me'. Is that open to 'interpretation'?

Bore off, Assinine.

Does that mean something?

.
Lol


Accelafine<->Asinine.. get it?

MagsJ wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 8:42 pm .
Lol


Accelafine<->Asinine.. get it?

Oh right. They both begin with 'A'. Hilarious. Never heard 'bore off' before. It's apparently something that extemely entertaining and interesting people like you say to 'dismiss' people like me as their inferiors.
Well that REALLY put me in my place didn't it....

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 9:20 pm

MagsJ wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 8:42 pm .
Lol


Accelafine<->Asinine.. get it?

Oh right. They both begin with 'A'. Hilarious. Never heard 'bore off' before. It's apparently something that extemely entertaining and interesting people like you say to 'dismiss' people like me as their inferiors.
Well that REALLY put me in my place didn't it....

..and you put words in my mouth, that I did not say.

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 7:49 pm

Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 3:57 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:18 pm Undiluted insanity on full display. It's not a pretty sight

That ain't kind, old thing. Something i struggle with. Just foe them.

What do you mean 'old thing'? That 'ain't kind' either, old fool.

I beg your pardon old thing, it's a term of endearment. But you're now a foe on a growing list. Bye. I don't do polemics. I don't do ad hominem.