Re: Heaven and hell are not just "illusory"
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2024 1:46 pm
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
I agree with Age's point that if there is a "multiverse" then the totality of all multiverses is, by definition, the universe. Even a dumb "hick" like me isn't as stupid as you are. What a joke. Spend all your life studying abstractions of math and you can't even see what's in front of your eyes.
Why the hell would you agree with Age's point. In a multiverse topic, by definition the totality of all multiverses is not the universe.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:23 pmI agree with Age's point that if there is a "multiverse" then the totality of all multiverses is, by definition, the universe. Even a dumb "hick" like me isn't as stupid as you are. What a joke. Spend all your life studying abstractions of math and you can't even see what's in front of your eyes.
Because the "multiverse" is a bunch of nonsensical sophistry. It's a joke theory. It can't even get its terminology straight.Atla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:27 pmWhy the hell would you agree with Age's point. In a multiverse topic, by definition the totality of all multiverses is not the universe.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:23 pmI agree with Age's point that if there is a "multiverse" then the totality of all multiverses is, by definition, the universe. Even a dumb "hick" like me isn't as stupid as you are. What a joke. Spend all your life studying abstractions of math and you can't even see what's in front of your eyes.
There's nothing wrong with the terminology, it's just not compatible with the old definition of universe.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:30 pmBecause the "multiverse" is a bunch of nonsensical sophistry. It's a joke of a theory. It can't even get its terminology straight.Atla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:27 pmWhy the hell would you agree with Age's point. In a multiverse topic, by definition the totality of all multiverses is not the universe.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:23 pm
I agree with Age's point that if there is a "multiverse" then the totality of all multiverses is, by definition, the universe. Even a dumb "hick" like me isn't as stupid as you are. What a joke. Spend all your life studying abstractions of math and you can't even see what's in front of your eyes.
There is no "old" definition of "universe". The universe has been much the same since the beginning of human civilization. The "multiverse" theory isn't even incorrect, it's nonsense. It's the equivalent of a pseudo-scientific cult.Atla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:35 pmThere's nothing wrong with the terminology, it's just not compatible with the old definition of universe.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:30 pmBecause the "multiverse" is a bunch of nonsensical sophistry. It's a joke of a theory. It can't even get its terminology straight.
Yes there is an "old" definition of "universe", at least when it comes to multiverse theories. Deal with it.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:37 pmThere is no "old" definition of "universe". The universe has been much the same since the beginning of human civilization. The "multiverse" theory isn't even incorrect, it's nonsense.Atla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:35 pmThere's nothing wrong with the terminology, it's just not compatible with the old definition of universe.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:30 pm
Because the "multiverse" is a bunch of nonsensical sophistry. It's a joke of a theory. It can't even get its terminology straight.
There's the universe and the universe is by definition everything. Multiverse nonsense is a stupid fad. They can't even prove there is a multiverse. What nonsense. If that's what you want to believe, knock yourself out. Let me know when you start levitating rocks and speaking in tongues.Atla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:39 pmYes there is an "old" definition of "universe", at least when it comes to multiverse theories. Deal with it.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:37 pmThere is no "old" definition of "universe". The universe has been much the same since the beginning of human civilization. The "multiverse" theory isn't even incorrect, it's nonsense.![]()
Of course it can't be proven, it's not something to "believe" in. Just fuck offGary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:46 pmThere's the universe and the universe is by definition everything. Multiverse nonsense is a stupid fad. They can't even prove there is a multiverse. What nonsense. If that's what you want to believe, knock yourself out. Let me know when you start levitating rocks and speaking in tongues.Atla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:39 pmYes there is an "old" definition of "universe", at least when it comes to multiverse theories. Deal with it.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:37 pm
There is no "old" definition of "universe". The universe has been much the same since the beginning of human civilization. The "multiverse" theory isn't even incorrect, it's nonsense.![]()
Not considering hypothetical extensions to the world we see, is the end of philosophy, but of course idiots like this one don't even understand this much
I'm sure you're not an idiot. You're probably very intelligent. You just need to get terminology straight. And it's not your fault. So don't be hard on yourself.Atla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:56 pmNot considering hypothetical extensions to the world we see, is the end of philosophy, but of course idiots like this one don't even understand this much
In multiverse topics, "universe" doesn't mean absolutely everything. Which part of this escapes your understanding?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:58 pmI'm sure you're not an idiot. You're probably very intelligent. You just need to get terminology straight. And it's not your fault. So don't be hard on yourself.
Then what do you call everything? Just "everything"?Atla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 5:00 pmIn multiverse topics, "universe" doesn't mean absolutely everything. Which part of this escapes your understanding?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:58 pmI'm sure you're not an idiot. You're probably very intelligent. You just need to get terminology straight. And it's not your fault. So don't be hard on yourself.
Usually, everything = multiverse.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 5:04 pmThen what do you call everything? Just "everything"?Atla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 5:00 pmIn multiverse topics, "universe" doesn't mean absolutely everything. Which part of this escapes your understanding?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:58 pm
I'm sure you're not an idiot. You're probably very intelligent. You just need to get terminology straight. And it's not your fault. So don't be hard on yourself.