Philosophy Now Forum

Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 11:45 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 7:05 am

Age wrote: ↑Sat Feb 26, 2022 11:08 pm

LOL DIVERSION, AGAIN.

WHY is NO one helping and supporting you?

IF absolutely ANY reader here KNOWS what "atla" wanted PROOF of, then will you PLEASE INFORM the rest of us?

Awwwwww how special and important you are

No one is reading your "conversations", genius.

Talk about a Truly SELF-CONTRADICTING CLAIM here.

I now wonder if one would HAVE TO BE a True, so-called, "genius" to just be ABLE TO SEE and RECOGNIZE the CONTRADICTION here?

Let us KNOW if ANY one can NOT SEE the CONTRADICTION here. But I doubt VERY MUCH there is ANY one who could NOT CLEARLY SEE the CONTRADICTION here.

It's not a self-contradiction, only autists wouldn't understand the implicit implication that it means "no one is reading this except you and me".

Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 10:52 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 7:05 am

Age wrote: ↑Sat Feb 26, 2022 11:08 pm

LOL DIVERSION, AGAIN.

WHY is NO one helping and supporting you?

IF absolutely ANY reader here KNOWS what "atla" wanted PROOF of, then will you PLEASE INFORM the rest of us?

Awwwwww how special and important you are

No one is reading your "conversations", genius. Even if for some reason 1-2 people read it, they usually can't be bothered to waste time correcting your lies, it's futile.

So, to you, In one second, and one sentence, "NO one is reading", but then, all of sudden, in the next second and sentence, there may be, "for some reason 1-2 people reading this discussion here, in this forum", correct?

And, let us NOT FORGET you ALSO CLAIMED; "Future readers will look back at this historical moment, ...". So, will these so-called "future readers" just be 1 or 2 of?

By the way, and as you have OBVIOUSLY MISUNDERSTOOD, ONCE AGAIN, I just want ANY one to INFORM us of what 'it' is, EXACTLY, that 'you' want PROOF of.

If NO one ELSE can TELL us what 'you' WANT PROOF for "atla", and 'you' will NOT TELL us, then us will NEVER KNOW.

By the way, what I asked for, from you "atla", in my CLARIFYING questions, posed to you, we are ALSO STILL WAITING FOR.

But if you just want to CONTINUE DEFLECTING, then PLEASE CONTINUE ON as you ARE.

Getting bored again, didn't read it

Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 11:41 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 7:12 am

Age wrote: ↑Sat Feb 26, 2022 11:14 pm

LOL ANOTHER ATTEMPT



I asked you CLARIFYING questions about what you SAID and CLAIMED here. IF you provide Honest CLARIFYING ANSWERS, then this WILL DISPROVE your CLAIMS, and this is WHY you KEEP DEFLECTING here.

Also, your, now, CLAIM that you did NOT make ANY CLAIMS that require PROOF just SHOWS and REVEALS the 'lengths' you will 'try to' go to to DEFLECT AWAY from your ACTUAL DISHONESTY here.

If ANY one wants the "other" to provide PROOF for their CLAIMS, THEN THOSE CLAIMS REQUIRE PROOF.

If there was such a 'thing' as a CLAIM that does NOT REQUIRE PROOF, then ANY one could SAY ANY 'thing'.

Now you HAVE MADE CLAIMS HERE, and, they DO REQUIRE PROOF. UNDERSTOOD?

Or, are you going to 'try to' be DISHONEST, AGAIN?

I made the "claim" that we can't prove a negative, which some people disagree with, but is otherwise a standard in intelligent conversation.

LOL

If I was INTERESTED in that CLAIM, then I would have QUERIED you about it.

But what I WAS Truly INTERESTED IN was the ACTUAL QUESTIONS I posed to you for CLARIFICATION, which you OBVIOUSLY REFUSE to answer and ARE CONTINUALLY TRYING TO DEFLECT AWAY from.

Atla wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 7:12 am Of course you know nothing about this. You wouldn't understand that we can't prove that the flying spaghetti monster doesn't exist.

LOL Talk about TRYING TO DEFLECT AWAY from the ACTUAL ISSUE here as MUCH as possible.

Atla wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 7:12 am No sign of a flying spaghetti monster, no sign of reality having an intention.

We KNOW what you have CLAIMED here.

You just have NOT YET informed us of who EXACTLY is NOT SEEING "ANY sign of reality, itself, having absolutely ANY intention AT ALL" CLAIM. Is it just 'you', "atla" or are there "others" AS WELL?

And, if it is 'you' AND "others", then who, EXACTLY, are the "others"?

The ACTUAL TWO CLARIFYING questions I posed to you, in regards to YOUR ACTUAL CLAIM; "because reality doesn't seem to have any intention, reality probably isn't trying to know itself, WERE;

'because Reality does NOT seem to have ANY intention, TO YOU, then does this MEAN that Reality, Itself, does NOT have ANY intention?

As for 'Reality' PROBABLY NOT trying to know Itself, what are you basing this ASSUMPTION on, EXACTLY?

Atla wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 7:12 am That's why you have to prove it to us that reality indeed has an intention.

For me to PROVE some 'thing', to someone, then I FIRST NEED to KNOW some 'things', from them. That is WHY you HAVE TO answer and CLARIFY my CLARIFYING questions I asked you.

As I continually STATE and SAY, when one is Truly OPEN and Honest, then they can FIND and SEE thee ACTUAL Truth of 'things', almost instantaneously, and VERY SIMPLY and VERY EASILY, by the way.

SO, what this MEANS IS when, and IF, 'you' EVER become Truly Honest and OPEN, and seriously Want to CHANGE, then 'you' WILL START SEEING, UNDERSTANDING, and KNOWING what thee ACTUAL Truth of 'things' IS, for and by "your" OWN 'self'.

Oh, and by the way, when 'you' learn HOW-TO answer the question, 'Who am 'I'?' properly and correctly, then 'you' will be ABLE to SEE the PROOF that 'Reality', Itself, HAD the intention to 'come-to' KNOW thy Self.

The PROOF for 'this' is IN the True, Right, AND Correct answer to the question, 'Who am 'I'?'

Have 'you' been ABLE TO answer this question, correctly YET?

If no, then WHY NOT?

Same here

Atla wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:24 pm

Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 11:45 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 7:05 am
Awwwwww how special and important you are

No one is reading your "conversations", genius.

Talk about a Truly SELF-CONTRADICTING CLAIM here.

I now wonder if one would HAVE TO BE a True, so-called, "genius" to just be ABLE TO SEE and RECOGNIZE the CONTRADICTION here?

Let us KNOW if ANY one can NOT SEE the CONTRADICTION here. But I doubt VERY MUCH there is ANY one who could NOT CLEARLY SEE the CONTRADICTION here.

It's not a self-contradiction, only autists wouldn't understand the implicit implication that it means "no one is reading this except you and me".

Why do you not just say what you mean, instead of saying what you do NOT mean?

So, from now on when you say, "No one", what you ACTUALLY MEAN is some 'thing' different, correct?

And, how often do you say what you do NOT ACTUALLY mean?

No wonder these human beings, back in those days, had NOT YET seen, obtained, and understood what thee ACTUAL IS. They did, after all, continually say what was NOT true, and in doing so were, they were unconsciously BLINDING themselves to thee ACTUAL Truth, Itself. As is PROVED True here, once again, and throughout this forum.

By the way, if you KNOW that 'I am autisticv, which you MUST as you continually say, 'I am autist', then why do you NOT write in a way that I could understand you, especially considering the Fact that you are writing and replying to 'me'.

Atla wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:25 pm

Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 10:52 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 7:05 am
Awwwwww how special and important you are

No one is reading your "conversations", genius. Even if for some reason 1-2 people read it, they usually can't be bothered to waste time correcting your lies, it's futile.

So, to you, In one second, and one sentence, "NO one is reading", but then, all of sudden, in the next second and sentence, there may be, "for some reason 1-2 people reading this discussion here, in this forum", correct?

And, let us NOT FORGET you ALSO CLAIMED; "Future readers will look back at this historical moment, ...". So, will these so-called "future readers" just be 1 or 2 of?

By the way, and as you have OBVIOUSLY MISUNDERSTOOD, ONCE AGAIN, I just want ANY one to INFORM us of what 'it' is, EXACTLY, that 'you' want PROOF of.

If NO one ELSE can TELL us what 'you' WANT PROOF for "atla", and 'you' will NOT TELL us, then us will NEVER KNOW.

By the way, what I asked for, from you "atla", in my CLARIFYING questions, posed to you, we are ALSO STILL WAITING FOR.

But if you just want to CONTINUE DEFLECTING, then PLEASE CONTINUE ON as you ARE.

Getting bored again, didn't read it

Just so you are INFORMED I PROVED, once again, that you are a Truly WEAK and INCOMPETENT individual.

You COMPLAIN and WHINGE that I have not provided some 'thing', which you WANT, but you are such an INCAPABLE individual you can NOT even INFORM us readers what 'it' is that you actually WANT.

I also SHOWED and PROVED that what I have SAID and CLAIMED, which you INSIST could NEVER be True, is, in fact, IRREFUTABLY True, Right, AND Correct.

So, if you read, or do NOT read, I have PROVED that what I have said and claimed is True and what you have said and claimed is False, Wrong, and/or Incorrect.

Age wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 4:08 am Why do you not just say what you mean, instead of saying what you do NOT mean?

I did say what I mean, you just have an inability to percieve cues, implications, and understand how humans communicate, what they say. This is often part of autism. Except most other autistics realize this after a while, you didn't because you're also a narcissistic idiot. Instead you came up with a theory that all the others on the planet don't know what they are saying,

So, from now on when you say, "No one", what you ACTUALLY MEAN is some 'thing' different, correct?

And, how often do you say what you do NOT ACTUALLY mean?

No wonder these human beings, back in those days, had NOT YET seen, obtained, and understood what thee ACTUAL IS. They did, after all, continually say what was NOT true, and in doing so were, they were unconsciously BLINDING themselves to thee ACTUAL Truth, Itself. As is PROVED True here, once again, and throughout this forum.

By the way, if you KNOW that 'I am autisticv, which you MUST as you continually say, 'I am autist', then why do you NOT write in a way that I could understand you, especially considering the Fact that you are writing and replying to 'me'.

didn't read

Age wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 4:21 am

Atla wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:25 pm

Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 10:52 pm

So, to you, In one second, and one sentence, "NO one is reading", but then, all of sudden, in the next second and sentence, there may be, "for some reason 1-2 people reading this discussion here, in this forum", correct?

And, let us NOT FORGET you ALSO CLAIMED; "Future readers will look back at this historical moment, ...". So, will these so-called "future readers" just be 1 or 2 of?

By the way, and as you have OBVIOUSLY MISUNDERSTOOD, ONCE AGAIN, I just want ANY one to INFORM us of what 'it' is, EXACTLY, that 'you' want PROOF of.

If NO one ELSE can TELL us what 'you' WANT PROOF for "atla", and 'you' will NOT TELL us, then us will NEVER KNOW.

By the way, what I asked for, from you "atla", in my CLARIFYING questions, posed to you, we are ALSO STILL WAITING FOR.

But if you just want to CONTINUE DEFLECTING, then PLEASE CONTINUE ON as you ARE.

Getting bored again, didn't read it

Just so you are INFORMED I PROVED, once again, that you are a Truly WEAK and INCOMPETENT individual.

You COMPLAIN and WHINGE that I have not provided some 'thing', which you WANT, but you are such an INCAPABLE individual you can NOT even INFORM us readers what 'it' is that you actually WANT.

I also SHOWED and PROVED that what I have SAID and CLAIMED, which you INSIST could NEVER be True, is, in fact, IRREFUTABLY True, Right, AND Correct.

So, if you read, or do NOT read, I have PROVED that what I have said and claimed is True and what you have said and claimed is False, Wrong, and/or Incorrect.

skip

Atla wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:54 am

Age wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 4:08 am Why do you not just say what you mean, instead of saying what you do NOT mean?

I did say what I mean, you just have an inability to percieve cues, implications, and understand how humans communicate, what they say.

LOL If you SAY and BELIEVE so.

Atla wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:54 am This is often part of autism. Except most other autistics realize this after a while, you didn't because you're also a narcissistic idiot.

Will you provide ANY evidence or proof that 'I' am a NARCISSISTIC IDIOT?

If no, then WHY NOT?

Atla wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:54 am Instead you came up with a theory that all the others on the planet don't know what they are saying,

LOL What can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that because you ACTUALLY SAY what you do NOT mean, you think or BELIEVE "others" do this AS WELL.

I have NEVER even thought, let alone SAID that ALL the "others" on the planet do NOT know what they are saying. And, to ASSUME or even just think that that is what I am SAYING and MEANING, especially when I have NEVER SAID 'this' is a PRIME EXAMPLE of MISCONSTRUING what was ACTUALLY SAID and MEANT.

So, talk about absolutely CONFUSION from TWISTING and DISTORTING here.

You are SO CONFUSED and LOST that you ACTUALLY BELIEVE that you can SAY absolutely ANY thing, but MEAN absolutely ANY thing ELSE, and "others" WILL KNOW what you ACTUALLY MEANT. And, because you are SO CONFUSED and LOST here that you have INTERPRETED this to MEAN that what I ACTUALLY SAY and MEAN, MEANS some OTHER thing ELSE. Talk about absolute and TOTAL ABSURDITY.

You SAY, "No one is reading your "conversations", genius.", but you ACTUALLY MEAN, "Some people read our, or these, conversations". (Or if you REALLY DID MEAN "your conversations", then did you REALLY MEAN NO one or SOME people read "my conversations"?)

Also EVERY thing I have SAID and WRITTEN in this forum can be CLEARLY SEEN, and in it there is absolutely NOTHING WHATSOEVER about ANY one, let alone EVERY one else, "NOT knowing what they are saying". Let alone MEANING this ABSOLUTELY ANYWHERE.

So, AGAIN, here is a PRIME EXAMPLE of one who writes and SAYS 'one thing', but MEANS ANOTHER 'thing', AND expects "others" to KNOW what it MEANS, which causes that one to EXPECT what "another" is MEANING, when they are OBVIOUSLY and CLEARLY NOT 'meaning' 'that' AT ALL.

Which is ALL a VERY TWISTED and DISTORTED way of LOOKING AT and SEEING 'things'.

I suggest just SAY what you MEAN, and, MEAN what you SAY, ONLY.

That way makes 'things' MUCH MORE SIMPLE and EASY, REALLY.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 1:15 pm LOL If you SAY and BELIEVE so.

I have no beliefs either, if we use your meaning for the word. Yet another thing you failed to comprehend every single time.

Atla wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:54 am This is often part of autism. Except most other autistics realize this after a while, you didn't because you're also a narcissistic idiot.

Will you provide ANY evidence or proof that 'I' am a NARCISSISTIC IDIOT?

If no, then WHY NOT?

Atla wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:54 am Instead you came up with a theory that all the others on the planet don't know what they are saying,

LOL What can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that because you ACTUALLY SAY what you do NOT mean, you think or BELIEVE "others" do this AS WELL.

I have NEVER even thought, let alone SAID that ALL the "others" on the planet do NOT know what they are saying. And, to ASSUME or even just think that that is what I am SAYING and MEANING, especially when I have NEVER SAID 'this' is a PRIME EXAMPLE of MISCONSTRUING what was ACTUALLY SAID and MEANT.

So, talk about absolutely CONFUSION from TWISTING and DISTORTING here.

You are SO CONFUSED and LOST that you ACTUALLY BELIEVE that you can SAY absolutely ANY thing, but MEAN absolutely ANY thing ELSE, and "others" WILL KNOW what you ACTUALLY MEANT. And, because you are SO CONFUSED and LOST here that you have INTERPRETED this to MEAN that what I ACTUALLY SAY and MEAN, MEANS some OTHER thing ELSE. Talk about absolute and TOTAL ABSURDITY.

You SAY, "No one is reading your "conversations", genius.", but you ACTUALLY MEAN, "Some people read our, or these, conversations". (Or if you REALLY DID MEAN "your conversations", then did you REALLY MEAN NO one or SOME people read "my conversations"?)

Also EVERY thing I have SAID and WRITTEN in this forum can be CLEARLY SEEN, and in it there is absolutely NOTHING WHATSOEVER about ANY one, let alone EVERY one else, "NOT knowing what they are saying". Let alone MEANING this ABSOLUTELY ANYWHERE.

So, AGAIN, here is a PRIME EXAMPLE of one who writes and SAYS 'one thing', but MEANS ANOTHER 'thing', AND expects "others" to KNOW what it MEANS, which causes that one to EXPECT what "another" is MEANING, when they are OBVIOUSLY and CLEARLY NOT 'meaning' 'that' AT ALL.

Which is ALL a VERY TWISTED and DISTORTED way of LOOKING AT and SEEING 'things'.

I suggest just SAY what you MEAN, and, MEAN what you SAY, ONLY.

That way makes 'things' MUCH MORE SIMPLE and EASY, REALLY.

Skip, you poke a schizophrenic and she will produce a wall of text, even if no one reads it. Although you seem to have infinite free time so carry on.

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 4:46 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 1:15 pm LOL If you SAY and BELIEVE so.

I have no beliefs either, if we use your meaning for the word. Yet another thing you failed to comprehend every single time.

Did you NOT SEE the 'If' word here?

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 4:46 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:54 am This is often part of autism. Except most other autistics realize this after a while, you didn't because you're also a narcissistic idiot.

Will you provide ANY evidence or proof that 'I' am a NARCISSISTIC IDIOT?

If no, then WHY NOT?

Atla wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:54 am Instead you came up with a theory that all the others on the planet don't know what they are saying,

LOL What can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that because you ACTUALLY SAY what you do NOT mean, you think or BELIEVE "others" do this AS WELL.

I have NEVER even thought, let alone SAID that ALL the "others" on the planet do NOT know what they are saying. And, to ASSUME or even just think that that is what I am SAYING and MEANING, especially when I have NEVER SAID 'this' is a PRIME EXAMPLE of MISCONSTRUING what was ACTUALLY SAID and MEANT.

So, talk about absolutely CONFUSION from TWISTING and DISTORTING here.

You are SO CONFUSED and LOST that you ACTUALLY BELIEVE that you can SAY absolutely ANY thing, but MEAN absolutely ANY thing ELSE, and "others" WILL KNOW what you ACTUALLY MEANT. And, because you are SO CONFUSED and LOST here that you have INTERPRETED this to MEAN that what I ACTUALLY SAY and MEAN, MEANS some OTHER thing ELSE. Talk about absolute and TOTAL ABSURDITY.

You SAY, "No one is reading your "conversations", genius.", but you ACTUALLY MEAN, "Some people read our, or these, conversations". (Or if you REALLY DID MEAN "your conversations", then did you REALLY MEAN NO one or SOME people read "my conversations"?)

Also EVERY thing I have SAID and WRITTEN in this forum can be CLEARLY SEEN, and in it there is absolutely NOTHING WHATSOEVER about ANY one, let alone EVERY one else, "NOT knowing what they are saying". Let alone MEANING this ABSOLUTELY ANYWHERE.

So, AGAIN, here is a PRIME EXAMPLE of one who writes and SAYS 'one thing', but MEANS ANOTHER 'thing', AND expects "others" to KNOW what it MEANS, which causes that one to EXPECT what "another" is MEANING, when they are OBVIOUSLY and CLEARLY NOT 'meaning' 'that' AT ALL.

Which is ALL a VERY TWISTED and DISTORTED way of LOOKING AT and SEEING 'things'.

I suggest just SAY what you MEAN, and, MEAN what you SAY, ONLY.

That way makes 'things' MUCH MORE SIMPLE and EASY, REALLY.

Skip, you poke a schizophrenic and she will produce a wall of text, even if no one reads it. Although you seem to have infinite free time so carry on.

Well if you did read it, then what can be CLEARLY SEEN is EXACTLY HOW and WHY what you have said is False, Wrong, or Incorrect.

The readers have ALREADY SEEN this Fact.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 11:51 am Did you NOT SEE the 'If' word here?

I did, but in non-autistic speak "if you say and believe so" normally means that you do think that I believe. There's an implication in there that you can't perceive.

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 4:46 pm

Will you provide ANY evidence or proof that 'I' am a NARCISSISTIC IDIOT?

If no, then WHY NOT?



LOL What can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that because you ACTUALLY SAY what you do NOT mean, you think or BELIEVE "others" do this AS WELL.

I have NEVER even thought, let alone SAID that ALL the "others" on the planet do NOT know what they are saying. And, to ASSUME or even just think that that is what I am SAYING and MEANING, especially when I have NEVER SAID 'this' is a PRIME EXAMPLE of MISCONSTRUING what was ACTUALLY SAID and MEANT.

So, talk about absolutely CONFUSION from TWISTING and DISTORTING here.

You are SO CONFUSED and LOST that you ACTUALLY BELIEVE that you can SAY absolutely ANY thing, but MEAN absolutely ANY thing ELSE, and "others" WILL KNOW what you ACTUALLY MEANT. And, because you are SO CONFUSED and LOST here that you have INTERPRETED this to MEAN that what I ACTUALLY SAY and MEAN, MEANS some OTHER thing ELSE. Talk about absolute and TOTAL ABSURDITY.

You SAY, "No one is reading your "conversations", genius.", but you ACTUALLY MEAN, "Some people read our, or these, conversations". (Or if you REALLY DID MEAN "your conversations", then did you REALLY MEAN NO one or SOME people read "my conversations"?)

Also EVERY thing I have SAID and WRITTEN in this forum can be CLEARLY SEEN, and in it there is absolutely NOTHING WHATSOEVER about ANY one, let alone EVERY one else, "NOT knowing what they are saying". Let alone MEANING this ABSOLUTELY ANYWHERE.

So, AGAIN, here is a PRIME EXAMPLE of one who writes and SAYS 'one thing', but MEANS ANOTHER 'thing', AND expects "others" to KNOW what it MEANS, which causes that one to EXPECT what "another" is MEANING, when they are OBVIOUSLY and CLEARLY NOT 'meaning' 'that' AT ALL.

Which is ALL a VERY TWISTED and DISTORTED way of LOOKING AT and SEEING 'things'.

I suggest just SAY what you MEAN, and, MEAN what you SAY, ONLY.

That way makes 'things' MUCH MORE SIMPLE and EASY, REALLY.

Skip, you poke a schizophrenic and she will produce a wall of text, even if no one reads it. Although you seem to have infinite free time so carry on.

Well if you did read it,

I didn't

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 3:17 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 11:51 am Did you NOT SEE the 'If' word here?

I did,

As long as you SAW 'it', then that is the IMPORTANT part.

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 3:17 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 11:51 amWell if you did read it,

I didn't

Okay.

simplicity wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 7:04 pm With time, I find that I have less and less to say [in general]. I know why this is the case and often wonder why I contribute anything at all. Consider the following...

...many might agree that each and every moment is complete, just the way it is. What more needs to be added?

Is reality not enough for most folks who feel compelled to add an addendum to all that transpires?

Talk about the arrogance of a species that would hardly find itself in the top ten primates!

What can I add? Truth!

simplicity wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 7:04 pm With time, I find that I have less and less to say [in general]. I know why this is the case and often wonder why I contribute anything at all. Consider the following...

...many might agree that each and every moment is complete, just the way it is. What more needs to be added?

Is reality not enough for most folks who feel compelled to add an addendum to all that transpires?

Talk about the arrogance of a species that would hardly find itself in the top ten primates!

That's very "content" of you, simplicity,...



---enjoy your cud.
_______

seeds wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 11:50 pm

simplicity wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 7:04 pm With time, I find that I have less and less to say [in general]. I know why this is the case and often wonder why I contribute anything at all. Consider the following...

...many might agree that each and every moment is complete, just the way it is. What more needs to be added?

Is reality not enough for most folks who feel compelled to add an addendum to all that transpires?

Talk about the arrogance of a species that would hardly find itself in the top ten primates!

That's very "content" of you, simplicity,...



---enjoy your cud.
_______

That's very clever but instead of dazzling us with your wit, why not write something interesting that we can have a conversation about.

It seems as if you should be wondering about the same issue.