Philosophy Now Forum

Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 6:26 am That is my final point on the topic and I am giving it a pass.

Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 3:00 pm

Age wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 8:26 am

Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 1:26 pm

I've no interest in getting into an argument about what philosophy refers to.

If you SEE that when I just ask you a Truly OPEN CLARIFYING QUESTION, for CLARITY, is "getting into an argument", then you are FAR MORE DISILLUSIONED than I first observed and noticed.

Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 1:26 pm You do philosophy when you think and write in a philosophical way, using philosophical methodology.

Is it REALLY just to hard and/or complex for you to just inform us of the word 'philosophy' actually means or refers to, to you, EXACTLY?

Before I ask you what is 'a philosophical way', exactly, and does 'using philosophical methodology' mean or refer to, to you, I will WAIT to SEE what the word 'philosophy' even means or refers to, to you.

When I write "I've no interest in getting into an argument about what philosophy refers to" I'm not being dishonest. Either you're capable of learning something about how I feel, my preferences, etc. or not. But whether you're capable or not, it's not going to change my disposition that I've no interest in getting into an argument about what philosophy refers to.

Age wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 4:05 am

Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 3:00 pm

Age wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 8:26 am

If you SEE that when I just ask you a Truly OPEN CLARIFYING QUESTION, for CLARITY, is "getting into an argument", then you are FAR MORE DISILLUSIONED than I first observed and noticed.


Is it REALLY just to hard and/or complex for you to just inform us of the word 'philosophy' actually means or refers to, to you, EXACTLY?

Before I ask you what is 'a philosophical way', exactly, and does 'using philosophical methodology' mean or refer to, to you, I will WAIT to SEE what the word 'philosophy' even means or refers to, to you.

When I write "I've no interest in getting into an argument about what philosophy refers to" I'm not being dishonest. Either you're capable of learning something about how I feel, my preferences, etc. or not. But whether you're capable or not, it's not going to change my disposition that I've no interest in getting into an argument about what philosophy refers to.

But I just asked a VERY SIMPLE and VERY STRAIGHT FORWARD, Truly OPEN CLARIFYING QUESTION, to you, ONLY.

ANY ASSUMPTION or BELIEVE about "arguing" is ALL of your OWN making and imagination, ALONE.

If you are UNABLE to just CLARIFY what just one word means or refers to, to you, (and especially within a philosophy forum) then so be it. You are just INCAPABLE of doing that, and that is ALL. ANY talk of about "getting into arguments" has absolutely NOTHING whatsoever to do with me.

Maybe if you could get a retrofit.

Your OBVIOUSLY INABILITY to inform us of what the word 'philosophy' means or refers to here, to you, just SHOWS and REVEALS MORE about 'you' and your abilities and INABILITIES.

Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:33 pm

Age wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 4:05 am

Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 3:00 pm

When I write "I've no interest in getting into an argument about what philosophy refers to" I'm not being dishonest. Either you're capable of learning something about how I feel, my preferences, etc. or not. But whether you're capable or not, it's not going to change my disposition that I've no interest in getting into an argument about what philosophy refers to.

But I just asked a VERY SIMPLE and VERY STRAIGHT FORWARD, Truly OPEN CLARIFYING QUESTION, to you, ONLY.

ANY ASSUMPTION or BELIEVE about "arguing" is ALL of your OWN making and imagination, ALONE.

If you are UNABLE to just CLARIFY what just one word means or refers to, to you, (and especially within a philosophy forum) then so be it. You are just INCAPABLE of doing that, and that is ALL. ANY talk of about "getting into arguments" has absolutely NOTHING whatsoever to do with me.

Maybe if you could get a retrofit.

Your OBVIOUSLY INABILITY to inform us of what the word 'philosophy' means or refers to here, to you, just SHOWS and REVEALS MORE about 'you' and your abilities and INABILITIES.

^^^
Hence why I'm not about to get into a discussion re what "philosophy" refers to with you.

Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:33 pm You'd need to possess a completely different personality for me to engage in that with you.

Age wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 9:46 am

Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:33 pm

Age wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 4:05 am

But I just asked a VERY SIMPLE and VERY STRAIGHT FORWARD, Truly OPEN CLARIFYING QUESTION, to you, ONLY.

ANY ASSUMPTION or BELIEVE about "arguing" is ALL of your OWN making and imagination, ALONE.

If you are UNABLE to just CLARIFY what just one word means or refers to, to you, (and especially within a philosophy forum) then so be it. You are just INCAPABLE of doing that, and that is ALL. ANY talk of about "getting into arguments" has absolutely NOTHING whatsoever to do with me.

Maybe if you could get a retrofit.

Your OBVIOUSLY INABILITY to inform us of what the word 'philosophy' means or refers to here, to you, just SHOWS and REVEALS MORE about 'you' and your abilities and INABILITIES.

^^^
Hence why I'm not about to get into a discussion re what "philosophy" refers to with you.

WHY would you ASSUME that there was EVER going to be a discussion about what the word 'philosophy' just refers to, to you?

OBVIOUSLY, there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in the WHOLE Universe that could be DISPUTED or REFUTED in relation to what the word 'philosophy' means or refers to, to you. Therefore, AGAIN, WHY would you ASSUME there was EVER going to be ANY discussion AT ALL about this?

Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:33 pm You'd need to possess a completely different personality for me to engage in that with you.

So, this person here can ONLY SEE words in front of them, but yet they CLAIM to be ABLE TO KNOW the personality behind those words.

Oh, and by the way, you have ALREADY been engaging with me, and STILL ARE.

Also, if you do NOT like to engage with someone who just asks you a CLARIFYING QUESTION for the purpose of BETTER UNDERSTANDING 'you', then so be it.

But, there is NO wonder WHY there are people like this one here who NEVER gets to FULLY UNDERSTAND and KNOW "another".

Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 12:35 pm

Age wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 9:46 am

Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:33 pm
^^^
Hence why I'm not about to get into a discussion re what "philosophy" refers to with you.

WHY would you ASSUME that there was EVER going to be a discussion about what the word 'philosophy' just refers to, to you?

OBVIOUSLY, there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in the WHOLE Universe that could be DISPUTED or REFUTED in relation to what the word 'philosophy' means or refers to, to you. Therefore, AGAIN, WHY would you ASSUME there was EVER going to be ANY discussion AT ALL about this?

Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:33 pm You'd need to possess a completely different personality for me to engage in that with you.

So, this person here can ONLY SEE words in front of them, but yet they CLAIM to be ABLE TO KNOW the personality behind those words.

Oh, and by the way, you have ALREADY been engaging with me, and STILL ARE.

Also, if you do NOT like to engage with someone who just asks you a CLARIFYING QUESTION for the purpose of BETTER UNDERSTANDING 'you', then so be it.

But, there is NO wonder WHY there are people like this one here who NEVER gets to FULLY UNDERSTAND and KNOW "another".

Doubling down on the negative personality quirks probably won't do the trick.