Page 5 of 8
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 4:33 pm
by Age
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 4:23 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 4:13 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 3:49 pm
I am asking you to define
the thing you claimed is missing.
But I NEVER claimed ANY thing is missing.
Well, we're done, then.
'you' "being done", ONCE AGAIN, is WHY putting people like 'you' in the 'religious spotlight' is just SO EASY and SIMPLE.
Providing the ACTUAL substantial and irrefutable evidence AND proof for the existence of God, as being REAL and True, is about one of the most SIMPLEST and EASIEST things to do. But, only to those who neither BELIEVE nor DISBELIEVE (in) God. which unfortunately is NONE of 'you', people, in this forum, in the days when this is being written.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 5:28 pm
by Immanuel Can
Age wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 4:33 pm
Providing the ACTUAL substantial and irrefutable evidence AND proof for the existence of God, as being REAL and True, is about one of the most SIMPLEST and EASIEST things to do.
Good. Define it. What will you accept as "substantial and irrefutable proof"?
You say it's "one of the (sic) most simplest and easiest things to do," so you should have no problem.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 5:54 pm
by Age
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 5:28 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 4:33 pm
Providing the ACTUAL substantial and irrefutable evidence AND proof for the existence of God, as being REAL and True, is about one of the most SIMPLEST and EASIEST things to do.
Good. Define it.
LOOK, you define it.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 5:28 pm
What will you accept as "substantial and irrefutable proof"?
Can you REALLY not read? I have ALREADY answered this question.
Also, what will you accept as 'substantial and irrefutable proof'?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 5:28 pm
You say it's "one of the (sic) most simplest and easiest things to do," so you should have no problem.
This is True, Right, and Correct. I have NO problem here AT ALL.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 6:03 pm
by Immanuel Can
Age wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 5:54 pm
LOOK, you define it.
Non-responsive. You can't.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:12 am
by Dontaskme
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 6:03 pm
Non-responsive. You can't.
Do not resuscitate.
Do not glorify the gore.
Do not flog dead horses.
Do let sleeping dogs lie.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 8:30 am
by Dontaskme
Age wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 4:13 pmThere is NO "your mind".
I'm in two minds about that.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:52 am
by Age
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 6:03 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 5:54 pm
LOOK, you define it.
Non-responsive. You can't.
LOL
You could NOT be MORE WRONG here.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:56 am
by Age
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 8:30 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 4:13 pmThere is NO "your mind".
I'm in two minds about that.
When, and if, you learn and understand how the Mind and the brain work, then you will also learn, and understand, who and what 'lucifer' and 'God' are.
Then 'you' will also KNOW what 'you' are asking to be explained here.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:56 am
by Age
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 6:03 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 5:54 pm
LOOK, you define it.
Non-responsive. You can't.
I have ALREADY defined it. As evidence and PROVEN above.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 10:10 am
by Dontaskme
Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 6:58 pm
And yet, for some reason he doesn't think you're a total waste of time. You know the reason.
It's not for you to call.
Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 6:58 pmIt's why you abuse that reason.
The reason is because he's a Christian, and turns the other cheek in favour of rationality.
It's not for you to call.
I happen to like Mannie Ho Ho
I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.
Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 6:58 pm Jerks often like to test that amazing and admirable philosophy of life.
I know, Jerking off is sooooo amazing, that's why I'm an addict for my Jerk. No need to be jealous that women can come multiple times in one night.
Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 6:58 pmYou're quite fortunate that he is a Christian, or he probably wouldn't give you time of day, and would give back as he gets ...
It's easy to idolize someone you don't know.
Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 6:58 pm
Glad to help.
No one is going to save you. Get up for Christs sake.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 10:11 am
by Dontaskme
Age wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:56 am
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 8:30 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 4:13 pmThere is NO "your mind".
I'm in two minds about that.
When, and if, you learn and understand how the Mind and the brain work, then you will also learn, and understand, who and what 'lucifer' and 'God' are.
Then 'you' will also KNOW what 'you' are asking to be explained here.
Thanks God.
I always knew I could count on you to explain things I cannot explain for myself.
Lucky I've got two minds, so I can alternate between the two.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 10:37 am
by Age
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 10:11 am
Age wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:56 am
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 8:30 am
I'm in two minds about that.
When, and if, you learn and understand how the Mind and the brain work, then you will also learn, and understand, who and what 'lucifer' and 'God' are.
Then 'you' will also KNOW what 'you' are asking to be explained here.
Thanks God.
I always knew I could count on you to explain things I cannot explain for myself.
If you were Truly interested in learning MORE, then you would just keep asking MORE clarifying questions.
Also, I can only explain to you what you BELIEVE is possible to learn and KNOW.
I, obviously, can NOT teach and explain to you 'that' what you BELIEVE you can NOT learn and know.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 10:11 am
Lucky I've got two minds, so I can alternate between the two.
Who and/or or what is this 'I', which supposedly has two "minds"? And, what EXACTLY are these 'mind' thingies?
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:48 pm
by Immanuel Can
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:12 am
Do let sleeping dogs lie.
I am well advised. I will take your recommendation.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:52 pm
by Walker
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Apr 02, 2021 1:46 pm
Walker wrote: ↑Fri Apr 02, 2021 8:26 am
Could you explain?
On the surface, it appears to be the hubris of martyrdom.
Do I seem like I'm in for the hair shirt and self-flagellation...
No, it's not that. I like to give people a chance to tell me what they think, so long as there is some profit in going forward. Sometimes people get mad and say things they don't mean, or temporarily deflect and then return to sense. Being patient is fine. But you're right about this...that when it gets to the point that the dialogue becomes permanently uncivil or permanently disingenuous, you're best to cut your losses.
Dialogue is a bit of a wasteful process. Some of it will turn out useful, and some not so much. But that's okay.
There’s a difference between philosophical discussion, and some jackass ignorantly jerking you around for the sake of defiling Christianity, which I think is what has been directed towards you, btw.
This is the most inspiring video I’ve seen in a quite awhile. Everyone should see it, although it’s the stuff that gets censored … just as dislikes of Biden get erased from youtube.
The wrathful guardian says, “I don’t want to hear a word.”
https://amp.thepostmillennial.com/calga ... o-get-out/
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 3
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:19 pm
by Immanuel Can
Walker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:52 pm
There’s a difference between philosophical discussion, and some jackass ignorantly jerking you around for the sake of defiling Christianity, which I think is what has been directed towards you, btw.
I appreciate your caution. And, mindful, as you are, of the Biblical interdiction of the dispersal of nacreous spheroids in porcine precincts,
I sometimes forgo the dubious pleasure of further conversation...but I prefer to leave that assessment to the final moment, rather than jumping to conclusions about that too early.
In other words, I like to give people a maximal chance. But I will keep your caution in mind.