Fuuuuuuuck! You are so enlightened!
I thought it was just the sun shining out of your ass, but now I see that I was mistaken.
1 = 0 = infinity
Re: 1 = 0 = infinity
You can't even trash talk right, I saw you edit this comment like 5 times. Make up your mind
-
surreptitious57
- Posts: 4257
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 6:09 am
Re: 1 = 0 = infinity
A timeless Universe would be the same as a static one but that cannot be true of this one as it is in constant motion
Whereas in a timeless Universe there would be no motion or entropy for everything would literally be frozen in time
Whereas in a timeless Universe there would be no motion or entropy for everything would literally be frozen in time
Re: 1 = 0 = infinity
It really baffles me how people who only understand "time" in only one sense can waltz onto a philosophy forum.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 1:31 pm A timeless Universe would be the same as a static one but that cannot be true of this one as it is in constant motion
Whereas in a timeless Universe there would be no motion or entropy for everything would literally be frozen in time
Re: 1 = 0 = infinity
-
surreptitious57
- Posts: 4257
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 6:09 am
Re: 1 = 0 = infinity
The concept of timelessness is not one that can be easily understoodAtla wrote:
It really baffles me how people who only understand time in only one sense can waltz onto a philosophy forum
Just because you understand it does not mean everyone else can too
I have zero problem with it as a concept but just cannot see how it applies to empirical reality
The only things that are known not to experience time are massless particles and nothing else
Maybe I am a hundred years behind you in my thinking as you suggest but there is not much I can do about that if it is actually true
I do accept however that most scientific knowledge is provisional outside of falsification so maybe time is not what it appears to be
Re: 1 = 0 = infinity
Here, have a cookieSkepdick wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 3:21 pmIt's because the time-deity only talks to you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revelation
Re: 1 = 0 = infinity
Wavicles...but not waves...okay the western world is fucked, now I know why everyone hates philosophers...Atla wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 12:05 pmSo? Waves aren't forms. Besides the world isn't composed of waves but an infinite variety of wavicles.
My eyes see a continuous world btw.Again: in the illusory sense yes, but all that behaviour is also subject to fundamental timelessness. Come back when you understand.Geez my ass, dont ignore it. You said some not all, so time does exist.
We are all fucked.
Re: 1 = 0 = infinity
Time is the ratio of one static state to another. It is an approximation of one infinite movement (as no movement) through multiple states.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 1:31 pm A timeless Universe would be the same as a static one but that cannot be true of this one as it is in constant motion
Whereas in a timeless Universe there would be no motion or entropy for everything would literally be frozen in time
It would be equivalent to saying there is only one infinite line but we see it through multiple lines as ratios of the one line. Each line is still an line, and infinite, but it is an approximation of the one.
Last edited by Eodnhoj7 on Sun Aug 18, 2019 5:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 1 = 0 = infinity
Atla wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 12:17 pmLol that kind of vacuum is NOT a void, it's simply some kind of field we can't access directly/fully.
void "voids" itself effectively
And so does vacuum if you cannot access it. Void is only observed through multiple states, it is not a thing in itself but rather an observation of multiplicity.
Nothing projected is no longer nothing.
Ahh I can't take it anymore. In this thread you threw like 10-15 rather severe thinking errors at me, and 1 would already be too many.
I think I had my entertainment for now.