Page 5 of 5
Re: Paradoxes of Material Implication
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:18 pm
by Logik
Speakpigeon wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 7:39 pm
Proof by empirical fact. Good science.
So not only are you logically challenged, you are empirically challenged too?
Science/empiricism doesn't prove anything
Science
tests hypotheses.
You can't test a lone hypothesis. You require at least a pair. What is your alternative hypothesis to "Human logic is right"?
Re: Paradoxes of Material Implication
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 9:28 pm
by wtf
Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:18 pmYou require at least a pair.
Are you saying that Speakpigeon hasn't got a pair?
Re: Paradoxes of Material Implication
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 11:52 pm
by Logik
wtf wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 9:28 pm
Are you saying that Speakpigeon hasn't got a pair?
Can't say. He has show us only one so far.
