Age wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 10:21 pm
What I mean is exactly what I said; What are they disagreeing about?
For example I completely disagree with your written words, but I also have literally no understanding of what you are saying and meaning with and by those words, because surely some one of your calibre KNOWS that 'humanity' began thousands, if not millions, of years before what you said and wrote.
You said that wanting and EXPECTING "others" to just guess and assume what it is that 'you' are saying and meaning is how normal human communication works. Then you went on to say that the reason 'you', human beings, do disagree is EXACTLY because most of you do understand what the other one is saying.
Now, either I disagree with you because I do understand what it is that you are saying and meaning or I disagree because I do not understand what it is that you are saying and meaning. Because you will NOT clarify then the ONLY thing that I can off is the words that you HAVE, already, written. So, I disagree with you because obviously the "first age of humanity was NOT roughly around 12,000 years ago". This can very easily been proven to be true by the very fact of human made objects prior to that miniscule 12,000 years ago.
Are you sure of this?
How many people believe in God and how many people believe in Allah, and of all of them, how many of these people want to kill each other, just because they understand what the other one is thinking?
Also, what do you propose it is exactly that they thinking, which causes them to want to kill each other?
Do you think that they are aware that the "other" is thinking about the exact same thing?
But I do not believe any such thing. Why did you assume or believe such a thing as this?
Your wanting and expecting me to guess or assume what you are actually saying and meaning really does not work, well with me anyway. Considering the words that you use, and the actual definitions and meanings behind those words, then you ARE often so WRONG, like just now.
What people 'think' is of no real concern to me. What people 'know' however is another matter.
Why would people think or assume some thing like this, especially when it is so obviously wrong?
What would be better and more productive is to KNOW the actual and real Truth is instead.
Also, what exactly do you propose is this so "dangerous and delusional 'shit' ", which you assume that I am making up?
What 'belief' "before me" are you talking about, which usually led to more destruction, but there was never any evidence for anyway? I do NOT have belief so there is NO "belief before me".
If you want to be FULLY understood and accepted, then from the beginning you need to start with the truth, and then move on.
Starting off with your own beliefs and assumptions about what is true and right, but which obviously could be wrong and false, does not help you to be better understood, especially considering some of your beliefs and assumptions are clearly and obviously WRONG.
And then, when what is WRONG in what you write is pointed out you, you think and/or say that you want and expect "others" to just assume and guess what you are saying and meaning really is NEVER going to succeed.
Fair enough. Ignoring things is what completely closed and arrogant people tend to do.
