The Philosophy Discussion Forum

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 1:55 am

Sir-Sister-of-Suck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 1:54 am To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Eodnhoj7. His rationale is extremely subtle, and without at least a solid grasp of theoretical philosophy most of his remarks will go over the typical reader's head.

Is that right.

Or is it sarcasm? There are some intelligent people on here but I hadn't included your or eodnklgk...amongst them.

Sir-Sister-of-Suck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:11 am

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 1:55 am

Sir-Sister-of-Suck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 1:54 am To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Eodnhoj7. His rationale is extremely subtle, and without at least a solid grasp of theoretical philosophy most of his remarks will go over the typical reader's head.

Is that right.

Yes. There’s also Eodnhoj7's heavy metaphysical outlook, which is deftly woven into his character- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Wittgenstein literature, for instance.

And yes, by the way, i DO have a Eodnhoj7 tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It’s for the ladies’ eyes only- but even then they have to demonstrate that they’re within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.

Or is it sarcasm? There are some intelligent people on here but I hadn't included your or eodnklgk...amongst them.

I always love it when someone tries to make a jab at someone's intelligence, and they end up making a grammatical error. Makes me feel like a kid in a candy factory with all that sweet material.

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:27 amIndeed. It's always

Sir-Sister-of-Suck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:42 am

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:27 amIndeed. It's always

Well, no, just when that person is either trying to boaster their own intelligence or talk about how dumb someone else is. It's just a little fluff frosting, a lil cherry on top with that slight bit of irony.

Sir-Sister-of-Suck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 1:54 am To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Eodnhoj7. His rationale is extremely subtle, and without at least a solid grasp of theoretical philosophy most of his remarks will go over the typical reader's head.

EchoesOfTheHorizon wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 6:42 am I understand him just fine, and I have a IQ of 4.

And try not to mock his schitzo aspect, that can't be controlled (as far as I'm aware, he never said anywhere I'm aware of he is refusing medications).
Haha, no meds...at least I know where to go if I want a high.

In regards to the "schizo", the simple truth is that "truth is complex". What may seem like random patterns, to people like you for instance, appear like a symphony of order to me. Order is not always what someone perceives, or in this case "wants", it to be. The universe is more vast and complex than what we percieve it to be and the standards we use to "judge" that order (in this modern world) do not work as well as they could.


Kinda pointless and hateful to mock someone endlessly over a trait they can't conform to another standard with. You can occasionally bring it up, like making a short person joke, but doing it constantly is just being a pointless and increasingly weak willed dick. Dicks should always be firm and have a strong point to them, so as to be effective,so don't lessen the value of a good dick, of else they will come off as weak and pathetic, and nobody will want them around. You won't be a dick them, rather, just another asshole. And nobody likes assholes.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:18 pm

Sir-Sister-of-Suck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 1:54 am To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Eodnhoj7. His rationale is extremely subtle, and without at least a solid grasp of theoretical philosophy most of his remarks will go over the typical reader's head.

Thank you for the compliment, in all frankness I am glad "someone" understands why I am attempting to say.

Sir-Sister-of-Suck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:42 am trying to boaster their own intelligence

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:50 pm

Sir-Sister-of-Suck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:42 am trying to boaster their own intelligence

You should probably check your own work if you are going to resort to grammatical pettiness.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 11:10 pm Back to topic everybody!

So women don't want to sleep with with once they encounter your personality, but that's their fault for not recognising your amazingness?