For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Oh yeah that's right. I forget already (seniors moment). Thankssurreptitious57 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:52 am
I think that Science Fan has left the forum ken so he will not be participating in discussion here any more
That web site is funny, but really low quality AI slop. I suggest not using AI to do all your artwork if it places Nevada on the east coast of the USA in the location traditionally reserved for South Carolina, and what is that text supposed to be on the next pic? It seemingly says "FEDRL VI LWM". I would never use a pisspoor site like that to rent a lawyer, nor would anyone innocent.brittanyemorris wrote: ↑Sun Nov 23, 2025 2:42 am If the claim is abolition now, the burden is to show that (1) coercion and third-party exploitation can be deterred without criminal law, (2) information asymmetries and externalities (public nuisance, neighborhood effects) are better handled by civil/regulatory tools, and (3) outcomes (violence, STI rates, trafficking) improve relative to partial bans or targeted criminalization.
Two frames to test:
Millian liberty + harm principle: consensual adult exchange shouldn’t be criminalized; harms (coercion, trafficking, nuisance) are distinct wrongs already addressable by existing laws.
Vulnerability/commodification critique: even “consent” can be structurally constrained; decriminalization may entrench markets that systematically disadvantage the vulnerable.
A useful way forward is to compare models on falsifiable outcomes (violence against workers, access to justice, exploitation indicators) rather than slogans. Background overview of the main legal models and their trade-offs:
https: // bestlawyersinunitedstates . com /is-prostitution-legal/
When Ken was a regular human LOLken wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:55 amOh yeah that's right. I forget already (seniors moment). Thankssurreptitious57 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:52 am
I think that Science Fan has left the forum ken so he will not be participating in discussion here any more
It's either Age before his great ascension into ultimate enlightenment or Age wasn't really Ken. It looks too much like a normal person's post to be from Age.accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 12:32 amWhen Ken was a regular human LOLken wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:55 amOh yeah that's right. I forget already (seniors moment). Thankssurreptitious57 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:52 am
I think that Science Fan has left the forum ken so he will not be participating in discussion here any more
He changed after his ascension. It's definitly him though.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 3:53 amIt's either Age before his great ascension into ultimate enlightenment or Age wasn't really Ken. It looks too much like a normal person's post to be from Age.