Page 5 of 6
Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:56 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Greta wrote:vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
What are you talking about now? Do you even know what a 'straw man' is? Are you saying testosterone doesn't increase muscle mass and strength? I couldn't see the point of the article. I could understand it being newsworthy is she had won against male wrestlers.
No, just that you keep ranting and it's not the point, which is that when we consider nature and humanity's extended nature, we classify according to commonsense but it's only an approximation of a more complex reality. The issue for those in between is that, unlike many continua, the gender spectrum is largely pretty polarised, even more so than sexuality, so they are a tiny minority.
Pardon?
Are we not going slowly enough for you?
Would you prefer the world to be in black and white?
Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:50 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
Hobbes' Choice wrote:vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Greta wrote:
No, just that you keep ranting and it's not the point, which is that when we consider nature and humanity's extended nature, we classify according to commonsense but it's only an approximation of a more complex reality. The issue for those in between is that, unlike many continua, the gender spectrum is largely pretty polarised, even more so than sexuality, so they are a tiny minority.
Pardon?
Are we not going slowly enough for you?
Would you prefer the world to be in black and white?
I suppose two 'dyslexics' would understand each other.
Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:58 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Hobbes' Choice wrote:vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Pardon?
Are we not going slowly enough for you?
Would you prefer the world to be in black and white?
I suppose two 'dyslexics' would understand each other.
Have you STILL got your period?
I only ask because you SO what to be treated as a woman.
Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 8:04 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
Hobbes' Choice wrote:vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Are we not going slowly enough for you?
Would you prefer the world to be in black and white?
I suppose two 'dyslexics' would understand each other.
Have you STILL got your period?
I only ask because you SO what to be treated as a woman.
Lame jokes don't offend me. You see, there are grown up people around who don't get 'offended' by everything that the PC thought-police think others should be offended by. And stop moaning about Trump. He's your baby.
Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 8:05 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Hobbes' Choice wrote:vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
I suppose two 'dyslexics' would understand each other.
Have you STILL got your period?
I only ask because you SO what to be treated as a woman.
Lame jokes don't offend me. You see, there are grown up people around who don't get 'offended' by everything that the PC thought-police think others should be offended by.
Run along and tell your Nursey that the big boys have been naughty!
Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 8:35 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
Hobbes' Choice wrote:vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Have you STILL got your period?
I only ask because you SO what to be treated as a woman.
Lame jokes don't offend me. You see, there are grown up people around who don't get 'offended' by everything that the PC thought-police think others should be offended by.
Run along and tell your Nursey that the big boys have been naughty!
You are so smug and sure of your 'righteousness' that you don't even deign to argue (or that's the impression you want to give. You really have no argument). What makes you such a superior human being (along with your ilk) that you can dictate what everyone else can say or do?
Your movement needs to make these two photos its poster. 'A picture is worth...'

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:10 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Hobbes' Choice wrote:vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Lame jokes don't offend me. You see, there are grown up people around who don't get 'offended' by everything that the PC thought-police think others should be offended by.
Run along and tell your Nursey that the big boys have been naughty!
You are so smug and sure of your 'righteousness' that you don't even deign to argue (or that's the impression you want to give. You really have no argument). What makes you such a superior human being (along with your ilk) that you can dictate what everyone else can say or do?
Your movement needs to make these two photos its poster. 'A picture is worth...'

You're turning in to Bill, the picture posting idiot
Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:36 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
Hobbes' Choice wrote:vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Run along and tell your Nursey that the big boys have been naughty!
You are so smug and sure of your 'righteousness' that you don't even deign to argue (or that's the impression you want to give. You really have no argument). What makes you such a superior human being (along with your ilk) that you can dictate what everyone else can say or do?
Your movement needs to make these two photos its poster. 'A picture is worth...'

You're turning in to Bill, the picture posting idiot
I hardly ever post photos. Only when it's appropriate you racist hypocrite.
Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:01 pm
by thedoc
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
I suppose two 'dyslexics' would understand each other.
How's that working out for you?
Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:15 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
I hardly ever post photos. Only when it's appropriate you racist hypocrite.
1. Hilary in a head scarf
2. Dead babies.
So the fuck what?
Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:18 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
Hobbes' Choice wrote:vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
I hardly ever post photos. Only when it's appropriate you racist hypocrite.
1. Hilary in a head scarf
2. Dead babies.
So the fuck what?
Are you just pretending to be thick?
Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:21 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Hobbes' Choice wrote:vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
I hardly ever post photos. Only when it's appropriate you racist hypocrite.
1. Hilary in a head scarf
2. Dead babies.
So the fuck what?
Are you just pretending to be thick?
Two can play that game.

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:25 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
Hobbes' Choice wrote:vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Hobbes' Choice wrote:
1. Hilary in a head scarf
2. Dead babies.
So the fuck what?
Are you just pretending to be thick?
Two can play that game.

I feel embarrassed
for you.

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:27 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
I feel embarrassed
for you.

You're the one taking a crap!!!
Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:30 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
Hobbes' Choice wrote:vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
I feel embarrassed
for you.

You're the one taking a crap!!!
Funny, it looks just like you.