BradburyPound wrote:Walker wrote:vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Do you think Americans even realise that Russia isn't a 'commie bastard' any more?
Are you trying to say that the Rooskies no longer live in a Godless nation, which a communist country would be by definition, and because of that Obama is beginning a military buildup, either offense or defensive?
Did you not notice that the Soviet system collapsed?
And that God has returned, as it did in WW2?
Surely the only "godless" system by definition is the American republic, and that failed miserably too.
Both failed and godly nations are, like their religion quite warlike.
Yep, sounds exactly like what you’re saying, BP. Therefore, we can conclude that even a preemptive summation shall not deter a screed.
Moving from the specific to the general, does such natural impetus from thought to voice have any geopolitical correlation? Say, like a preemptive defensive buildup in Europe, the need of which was caused by fecklessness? Which way are those weapons pointed?
And what about Ukraine, wheedled into surrendering their defensive capabilities for their own good, as espoused by then senator and arms-reduction expert, man about town, soon-to-be master-of-the-universe harbinger of faux hopey change, who was obligingly, bowingly, apologetically, supplicatingly, eager to share oversight power over the vast earth kingdom of wealth and energy with any brute force that could rise to the top of the killing pile.
And why would anyone give such wealth and opportunity for destruction to a nation-state headed up by religious fundamentalists who have vowed to do terrible things for whatever their own twisted reasons may be?
What kind of a maroon would attempt to overthrow a regime practicing genocide against its own people, by bolstering rebels against the regime thereby sending the regime under the smelly wing of a Godless country that crushes said people with the boot of genocide, while righteous and impotent politics are spoken as response in faux defense of life, thereby attempting to refute the ineptitude that caused much suffering, simply for the public record.
Such an inept mindset asserts, that if you can say it right, then it is true. And who knows, maybe the history books controlled by proactive special interests will side with some fake version of past reality to bolster the election cycles of future power struggles, perhaps even the next cycle given the brevity of cycles these days.
Perhaps memories unformed during inattentiveness to reality and attentiveness upon less significant aspects is the cause for the brevity of all repetitive cycles, even those perceived in nature, and inattentiveness is simply misplaced attention caused by ignorance of what is significant. For instance, western philosophers and U.S. History taught objectively to adult, yet still-impressionable minds of collegiate age are significant not because someone assigns that significance, but for the lasting though some would say temporal impact upon a reality that includes man and his ignorance.
