Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 8:28 pm
.


For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/

Too late.Lacewing wrote:.
Actually I liked the interruption, It was much more interesting than your futile attempt at answering the question, would you like to try again? and this time do a better job.bobevenson wrote:a) First of all, you are butting into a private conversation. Doc asked a question and I answered it. I believe that makes you the inordinately stupid person.
b) Secondly, it confirms the idiocy of your posts in general.
thedoc wrote:Actually I liked the interruption, It was much more interesting than your futile attempt at answering the question, would you like to try again? and this time do a better job.bobevenson wrote:a) First of all, you are butting into a private conversation. Doc asked a question and I answered it. I believe that makes you the inordinately stupid person.
b) Secondly, it confirms the idiocy of your posts in general.
Then I'm in good company, thanks.bobevenson wrote:thedoc wrote:Actually I liked the interruption, It was much more interesting than your futile attempt at answering the question, would you like to try again? and this time do a better job.bobevenson wrote: a) First of all, you are butting into a private conversation. Doc asked a question and I answered it. I believe that makes you the inordinately stupid person.
b) Secondly, it confirms the idiocy of your posts in general.
Well, Doc, the spokesman for the Spiritual Counterfeits Project didn't think my explanation of 666 was a futile attempt. I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt, but you're coming across as stupid as Lacewing.
Jesus Christ, it's the wanker with unwashable stupidity.bobevenson wrote:Jesus Christ, it's the Bobbsey Twins!
That puts me in good company, thanks.bobevenson wrote:Whoops, make that the Three Mouseketeers!
Are you describing yourself again? See what you get for not being able to wash off the stupidity.bobevenson wrote:You got that right, numbnuts.
The spokesman for the Spiritual Counterfeits Project was being patronizing to you so that you wouldn't bother him again.bobevenson wrote: Well, Doc, the spokesman for the Spiritual Counterfeits Project didn't think my explanation of 666 was a futile attempt. I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt,
But what is it he claims to do besides shooting off his mouth? He gives all the credit to his "Divine Guidance." So far he hasn't produced a shred of evidence that would hold up in a court of law.thedoc wrote:PhilX, actually it's a lot more fun to challenge Bob to do what he claims that he can, and then laugh at his posts, than to play his own game with him.