Philosophy Now Forum

Bill Wiltrack wrote:I know you are not a troll but another active member accused you of being such somewhere else on this forum. I STOOD-UP FOR YOU but you gotta give me a little help here...just sayin...Good luck to you in your future posts.

Please, you know as well as I do that Arising (a.k.a. Kim Novak wannabe) is the biggest troll in the forum, never starts a thread and only throws rocks at people who do, and for you to stand up for him and say good luck in future posts says very little about your own questionable judgment.

bobevenson wrote:

Bill Wiltrack wrote:I know you are not a troll but another active member accused you of being such somewhere else on this forum. I STOOD-UP FOR YOU but you gotta give me a little help here...just sayin...Good luck to you in your future posts.

Please, you know as well as I do that Arising (a.k.a. Kim Novak wannabe) is the biggest troll in the forum, never starts a thread and only throws rocks at people who do, and for you to stand up for him and say good luck in future posts says very little about your own questionable judgment.

The blind leading the blind.

PhilX

.





.....................................I stand-up and support ALL active members here. That's what leaders do.







.

Bill Wiltrack wrote:.





.....................................I stand-up and support ALL active members here. That's what leaders do.







.

Who made you leader?

PhilX

bobevenson wrote:Who made you a troll?

You did as I'm your personal troll, troll.

PhilX

bobevenson wrote:OK, dum, dum.

Right on loser.

PhilX

Bill Wiltrack wrote:.Yeah, um...I know you are trying but we actually need to see more content from you.

You first.

If you are attempting to disagree with the philosophical premise of this thread you need to use critical thinking and at least some valid content. Like facts for instance.

Such as?

I know you are not a troll but another active member accused you of being such somewhere else on this forum. I STOOD-UP FOR YOU but you gotta give me a little help here...just sayin...

I'll think of you as billybob from now on.

Good luck to you in your future posts.[/size].

The irony is that you are clearly demonstrating that you cannot apply any critical thinking to your thoughts.

bobevenson wrote:

Bill Wiltrack wrote:I know you are not a troll but another active member accused you of being such somewhere else on this forum. I STOOD-UP FOR YOU but you gotta give me a little help here...just sayin...Good luck to you in your future posts.

Please, you know as well as I do that Arising (a.k.a. Kim Novak wannabe) is the biggest troll in the forum, never starts a thread and only throws rocks at people who do, and for you to stand up for him and say good luck in future posts says very little about your own questionable judgment.

Bill is the only real troll on here. I think his banning made him all bitter and twisted because he came back a gigantic troll. As for you: you are something else: a spam goblin.

bobevenson wrote:Please, you know as well as I do that Arising (a.k.a. Kim Novak wannabe) is the biggest troll in the forum, never starts a thread ...

You obviously have no idea what the definition of an interweeb troll is.

and only throws rocks at people who do, ...

Aw! Diddums can't cope with critique of his thoughts, there there boo boos.

The rocks are saved for the truly incorrigible and that'll be you bob.

and for you to stand up for him and say good luck in future posts says very little about your own questionable judgment.

He's taking the piss and playing to what he thinks is 'the audience' as he's a gnu.

That you think he's serious just points out to you being a Yank and taking pointless platitudes seriously. Have a nice day now.

Can't find any definition for 'gnu' that fits. He's definitely on one long piss-take though. Unusual for a yank--they are so damn literal.

Gnu(noun) - a budding guru, now-a-days most usually found upon the Interweeb seeking acolytes. Can be identified by their utterance of meaningless or contradictory aphorisms and vague and meaningless nonsense about a hidden 'Truth' or 'Reality' always just out of reach. Common traits, an inability to answer sentences with question marks, acute selective reading ability, massive belief confirmation bias, ad-hominen psycho-babble and a complete inability to walk their talk or even talk their walk. Be wary of such beasts. Preventative vaccination advised, i.e. a study of Philosophy, in particular a dose of critical philosophy and Logic as practiced in Philosophy now-a-days

Arising_uk wrote:Gnu(noun) - a budding guru, now-a-days most usually found upon the Interweeb seeking acolytes. Can be identified by their utterance of meaningless or contradictory aphorisms and vague and meaningless nonsense about a hidden 'Truth' or 'Reality' always just out of reach. Common traits, an inability to answer sentences with question marks, acute selective reading ability, massive belief confirmation bias, ad-hominen psycho-babble and a complete inability to walk their talk or even talk their walk. Be wary of such beasts. Preventative vaccination advised, i.e. a study of Philosophy, in particular a dose of critical philosophy and Logic as practiced in Philosophy now-a-days

Hmm, sounds like a useful word. Shame it's not more widely-known--it could come in handy when dealing with corporate types, 'life coaches', and others with the 'gift' of being able to babble endlessly but say nothing.

bobevenson wrote:OK, dum, dum.

This is proof that Bob is a prisoner of Satan from whom he has no escape. Satan has Bob trapped.

Bob needs exorcism to help him throw out Satan. Otherwise Bob may face permanent excommunication from this site as has already happened to him from other websites (e.g. PF).

PhilX