Philosophy Now Forum

thedoc wrote:

bobevenson wrote:

Arising_uk wrote:You've never actually said how 'Ouzo' defends one, apart from the useful task of inebriation

The defense that Ouzo provides against institutional false prophets is recognizing their ploys and artifices (see "The Ouzo Prophecy"). If you ever learned to play Ouzo, you wouldn't have to ask the question.

I believe that you once said that the game of Ouzo is a form of Lie'rs poker, so playing the game of Ouzo is teaching you to lie for your faith? That is very instructive. I prefer honesty, but then learning to recognize a lie is very useful, especially in reading Bob's posts.

Why don't you read "The Ouzo Prophecy" before talking such idiocy? Liar's poker is a watered-down version of Ouzo, like an attenuated virus that Satan inoculates people with to keep them from catching the real thing.

Says the Anti-Baptist, False Prophet for 'Satan' and the 'Beast'. One who promotes giving our world to 'them'.

Still, once more you turn a thread to your monomania.

Arising_uk wrote: Says the Anti-Baptist, False Prophet for 'Satan' and the 'Beast'. One who promotes giving our world to 'them'.

Still, once more you turn a thread to your monomania.

You just have an inferiority complex over not having the ability to understand the game of Ouzo or the philosophy it represents.

bobevenson wrote:You just have an inferiority complex over not having the ability to understand the game of Ouzo or the philosophy it represents.

Is that an agnostic philosophy bob?

bobevenson wrote:Theist, agnostic, atheist. As Bob the Baptist, I can tell you that the first and third are fools, and absolute fools at that.

bobevenson wrote:Anybody who isn't an agnostic is a fool.

bobevenson wrote:Don't feel bad, you still know how to play Ring Around the Rosie.

Feel bad bob, where on earth do you get that idea? I feel great.

When was the last time you left your house and actually interacted with people bob?

Oh! By the way,

bobevenson wrote:Theist, agnostic, atheist. As Bob the Baptist, I can tell you that the first and third are fools, and absolute fools at that.

bobevenson wrote:Anybody who isn't an agnostic is a fool.

So tell us oh 'prophet', are you an agnostic or an absolute fool?

Why don't you tell me your girl's name again so I can properly refer to you as a dumb ****, rhymes with runt.

bobevenson to Arising_uk wrote:The defense that Ouzo provides against institutional false prophets is recognizing their ploys and artifices...

Many people already recognize such things, Bob.

Can you offer/demonstrate (as you haven't yet) anything that ACTUALLY ENLIGHTENS anyone in any valuable way that they cannot already attain in many other ways? If not, how is your product/method of value to anyone except you, its intoxicated creator? Numbers and names and anagrams and your made-up credentials are the basis of your trip, but no valuable or meaningful END RESULT has been presented for other people. You've made some vague promise of salvation, as if anyone would believe that or think they need it. Why have you been unable to show anything enlightening that comes from it for anyone, Bob? Instead, you've demonstrated your own lack of transformation from it, and your inability to communicate anything enlightening. How is it that you are not a shining example of what it can do for a person?

bobevenson wrote:

thedoc wrote:

bobevenson wrote:The defense

I believe that you once said that the game of Ouzo is a form of Lie'rs poker, so playing the game of Ouzo is teaching you to lie for your faith? That is very instructive. I prefer honesty, but then learning to recognize a lie is very useful, especially in reading Bob's posts.

Why don't you read,

I did read it, and I've never seen so much BS in one place before.

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Don't feel bad, you still know how to play Ring Around the Rosie.

Feel bad bob, where on earth do you get that idea? I feel great.

When was the last time you left your house and actually interacted with people bob?

Oh! By the way,

bobevenson wrote:Theist, agnostic, atheist. As Bob the Baptist, I can tell you that the first and third are fools, and absolute fools at that.

bobevenson wrote:Anybody who isn't an agnostic is a fool.

So tell us oh 'prophet', are you an agnostic or an absolute fool?

Yes he is, absolutely.

thedoc wrote:

bobevenson wrote:

thedoc wrote: I believe that you once said that the game of Ouzo is a form of Lie'rs poker, so playing the game of Ouzo is teaching you to lie for your faith? That is very instructive. I prefer honesty, but then learning to recognize a lie is very useful, especially in reading Bob's posts.

Why don't you read,

I did read it, and I've never seen so much BS in one place before.

The shit is crammed in so tight that only a Troll with a big arse could have made that - so why feed it?

Hobbes' Choice wrote: The shit is crammed in so tight that only a Troll with a big arse could have made that - so why feed it?

This post,

"Re: Congratulations to American Scientists!
Postby thedoc » Mon Feb 15, 2016 7:50 pm
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Why are you people feeding this moronic racist Troll?
Amusement and boredom, what else is there?"

There seems to be a drought of philosophy on forums lately, so people amuse themselves with dross.

thedoc wrote:

Hobbes' Choice wrote: The shit is crammed in so tight that only a Troll with a big arse could have made that - so why feed it?

This post,

"Re: Congratulations to American Scientists!
Postby thedoc » Mon Feb 15, 2016 7:50 pm
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Why are you people feeding this moronic racist Troll?
Amusement and boredom, what else is there?"

There seems to be a drought of philosophy on forums lately, so people amuse themselves with dross.

Maybe the time spent on Troll feeding is the cause of the dearth. And do you not think that the trickle of newcomers seeing this bullshit would not see this Forum as worthwhile?
We do seem to get newbies, but they do not seem to stay. Wonder why?

Hobbes' Choice wrote:

thedoc wrote:

Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Why are you people feeding this moronic racist Troll?

Amusement and boredom, what else is there?"

There seems to be a drought of philosophy on forums lately, so people amuse themselves with dross.

Maybe the time spent on Troll feeding is the cause of the dearth. And do you not think that the trickle of newcomers seeing this bullshit would not see this Forum as worthwhile?
We do seem to get newbies, but they do not seem to stay. Wonder why?

Then why don't you set an example and post something worth reading, rather than so much hostility and vitriol.

Am I worng in saying that Muslims expect a society to live under Sharia, if the Muslim population attains 50% and above? Not trying to be inflammatory, but I believe this is the general expection. Can anyone answer this? I'll Google it myself in a bit.