Re: Do atheists freely choose Hell?
Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 2:34 am
Be an interesting act on So You Think You Can Dance. Not a day sooner!
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
You must change the timing belt at the recommended intervals!Obvious Leo wrote:I'm pleased to hear it, Skip. As I see it this leaves only the minor matter of the angels on the head of a pin as a question yet to be resolved. At this stage I am yet to commit to a firm position on this matter but you may rest assured that I am giving it my deepest consideration. I'll keep you posted on developments.Skip wrote:I never, ever do the big rocks! Or the cat in the box or the thumbnail of a giant.
Not sure that you believe that point. But it is absurd.ReliStuPhD wrote:2. The consequences of disbelief are clear (Hell)
attofishpi wrote:Not sure that you believe that point. But it is absurd.ReliStuPhD wrote:2. The consequences of disbelief are clear (Hell)
The answers to both points are in the original post.attofishpi wrote:Not sure that you believe that point. But it is absurd.ReliStuPhD wrote:2. The consequences of disbelief are clear (Hell)
How much oil are you losing? It'll never be zero, especially on a turbocharged engine. Miles per quart lost... Note that VW rather humorously states up to a quart per 1000 miles is "normal." Also, you can lose a fair amount out the exhaust without smoke, due to the catalytic converter.ReliStuPhD wrote:The answers to both points are in the original post.attofishpi wrote:Not sure that you believe that point. But it is absurd.ReliStuPhD wrote:2. The consequences of disbelief are clear (Hell)
Do they really?Melchior wrote:Note that VW rather humorously states up to a quart per 1000 miles is "normal."
How so? Do you seek only a partially good God?ReliStuPhD wrote:Well, that's sort of the question, though, isn't it? If, as the Christian holds, the atheist has received a clear indication but has actively dismissed it, is that a God with no moral sense. It's sort of like someone who moves to Oklahoma and, in building their house opts not to build a tornado shelter. Their neighbors warn them that it's important, but they look at the historical records and find that a tornado hasn't been through that area in over 300 years. What then happens when the tornado does come through and they don't have a shelter? That's not a perfect analogy by any means, but I think it helps capture the "I've deliberately chosen not to do X because I just think it's likely that Y will ever be an issue."Greatest I am wrote:Then that would show a vengeful God who lashes out without a just cause and shows that he has no moral sense.
So anyway, that's how it goes. As I've said, I'm not personally convinced, but I figured it was worth a go anyway.
This doesn't hold, but I can certainly understand your position. So while it's one I somewhat share, I know it's not inherently true.Greatest I am wrote:To one who seeks a good God, as we all should, that would disqualify him as a good God and thus he cannot exist.
You're confusing what I might be seeking with what I hold to be necessarily true. It is not necessarily true that a God who consigns people who disbelief to Hell as a result of their choice has no moral sense and is not good. That is simply your position (though I think it's a good one).Greatest I am wrote:How so? Do you seek only a partially good God?ReliStuPhD wrote:This doesn't hold, but I can certainly understand your position. So while it's one I somewhat share, I know it's not inherently true.Greatest I am wrote:To one who seeks a good God, as we all should, that would disqualify him as a good God and thus he cannot exist.
But remember, the point of this post is to argue the topic as if the Christian is right. That is, is their point correct if they're right about God. You've already agreed it would be, so in that respect, the OK example applies (but only for the sake of argument).Greatest I am wrote:Oklahoma is real and has real weather. What comes from the Gods of the religions is not fro a real God.
ReliStuPhD wrote:Do they really?Melchior wrote:Note that VW rather humorously states up to a quart per 1000 miles is "normal."
What a sad waste of a brain, to go through this nonsense.ReliStuPhD wrote:
1. God "clearly" reveals 'himself' to all humans, but does not compel belief
2. The consequences of disbelief are clear (Hell)
3. Atheists nevertheless freely choose not to believe.
4. Atheists freely choose Hell.
.
Rubbish.henry quirk wrote:"If Christians are right, and their God does exist, do atheists choose Hell by disbelieving?"
Yep.
Speaking of burning,henry quirk wrote:Missing the point, Hobbe's.
If Christians are right then I'm wrong, yes?
If Christian theology is right, then -- as an atheist -- I'm gonna burn, yes?
That is: if god exists, and if god is the Christian god, then all my assertions of 'no god, no heaven, no hell' mean diddly squat. God would judge me and sentence me and, as I'm an atheist, that means I burn.
‘If’, Hobbes…’if’.
Yes.henry quirk wrote:Missing the point, Hobbe.
If Christians are right then I'm wrong, yes?
If Christian theology is right, then -- as an atheist -- I'm gonna burn, yes?
That is: if god exists, and if god is the Christian god, then all my assertions of 'no god, no heaven, no hell' mean diddly squat. God would judge me and sentence me and, as I'm an atheist, that means I burn.
'If', Hobbe...'if'.